Nachshon I, Denno D
Cortex. 1987 Mar;23(1):45-58. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(87)80018-7.
Conflicting evidence exists concerning the possible role of birth stress in the etiology of left-sided lateral preferences. In order to clarify this issue, associations among lateral preferences of hand, eye, and foot and eight indices of prenatal and perinatal stress were examined in the present study on a sample of 987 boys and girls who participated in the Philadelphia Collaborative Perinatal Project. Controls were instituted for some of the methodological and measurement problems encountered in past birth stress and laterality research. Results showed that subjects with different lateral preferences did not differ significantly in their distributions of all but one birth stress items. Hence, there was no substantial evidence for a link between birth stress and left-sided preferences. Alternative hypotheses for the etiology of left-sidedness should therefore be explored.
关于出生压力在左侧偏好病因学中可能扮演的角色,存在相互矛盾的证据。为了阐明这个问题,在本研究中,对参与费城围产期协作项目的987名男孩和女孩样本,检查了手、眼和脚的偏好以及产前和围产期压力的八个指标之间的关联。针对过去出生压力和偏侧性研究中遇到的一些方法学和测量问题进行了控制。结果显示,除一项出生压力项目外,不同偏好的受试者在所有其他出生压力项目的分布上没有显著差异。因此,没有实质性证据表明出生压力与左侧偏好之间存在联系。因此,应该探索左侧偏好病因学的替代假设。