Suppr超能文献

认知压迫、结构效度与科学严谨性:对吴等人(2022年)的评论

Epistemic Oppression, Construct Validity, and Scientific Rigor: Commentary on Woo et al. (2022).

作者信息

Gómez Jennifer M

机构信息

Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences (CASBS), Stanford University, and Center for Institutional Courage, Palo Alto, California.

出版信息

Perspect Psychol Sci. 2023 Jan;18(1):32-38. doi: 10.1177/17456916211072830. Epub 2022 Jun 10.

Abstract

In this commentary, I highlight flaws in the article by Woo and colleagues (this issue) that undermine its credibility and utility as rigorous science that contributes to the field. I do so by discussing (a) the concept of epistemic oppression regarding the glaring exclusion of multiple germane bodies of research and (b) the importance of including construct validity within a psychometric article regarding the Graduate Record Examination (GRE). I conclude with a plea to the authors that the matter of anti-Black violence and murder, which they reference, is one to be taken respectfully, seriously, and somberly.

摘要

在这篇评论中,我着重指出了吴(Woo)及其同事的文章(本期)中的缺陷,这些缺陷损害了其作为严谨科学对该领域有所贡献的可信度和实用性。我通过讨论以下两点来做到这一点:(a)关于明显排除多个相关研究主体的认知压迫概念;(b)在一篇关于研究生入学考试(GRE)的心理测量学文章中纳入结构效度的重要性。最后,我恳请作者们,他们所提及的反黑人暴力和谋杀问题,应得到尊重、严肃和庄重的对待。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验