Bjurbom Markus, Olsson Christian, Geirsson Arnar, Gudbjartsson Tomas, Gunn Jarmo, Hansson Emma C, Hjortdal Vibeke, Jeppsson Anders, Mennander Ari, Ede Jacob, Zindovic Igor, Ahlsson Anders, Wickbom Anders, Dalén Magnus
Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2023 Mar;115(3):591-598. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2022.05.033. Epub 2022 Jun 8.
Emergency surgery for acute type A aortic dissection in patients with previous cardiac surgery is controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the association between previous cardiac surgery and outcomes after surgery for acute type A aortic dissection, to appreciate whether emergency surgery can be offered with acceptable risks.
All patients operated on for acute type A aortic dissection between 2005 and 2014 from the Nordic Consortium for Acute Type A Aortic Dissection database were eligible. Patients with previous cardiac surgery were compared with patients without previous cardiac surgery. Univariable and multivariable statistical analyses were performed to identify predictors of 30-day mortality and early major adverse events (a secondary composite endpoint comprising 30-day mortality, perioperative stroke, postoperative cardiac arrest, or de novo dialysis).
In all, 1159 patients were included, 40 (3.5%) with previous cardiac surgery. Patients with previous cardiac surgery had higher 30-day mortality (30% vs 17.8%, P = .049), worse medium-term survival (51.7% vs 71.2% at 5 years, log rank P = .020), and higher unadjusted prevalence of major adverse events (52.5% vs 35.7%, P = .030). In multivariable analysis, previous cardiac surgery was not associated with 30-day mortality (odds ratio 0.78; 95% CI, 0.30-2.07; P = .624) or major adverse events (odds ratio 1.07; 95% CI, 0.45-2.55, P = .879).
Major adverse events after surgery for acute type A aortic dissection were more frequent in patients with previous cardiac surgery. Previous cardiac surgery itself was not an independent predictor for adverse events, although the small sample size precludes definite conclusions. Previous cardiac surgery should not deter from emergency surgery.
曾接受心脏手术的患者因急性A型主动脉夹层而行急诊手术存在争议。本研究旨在评估既往心脏手术与急性A型主动脉夹层手术后结局之间的关联,以判断急诊手术是否能在可接受的风险下进行。
纳入北欧急性A型主动脉夹层联盟数据库2005年至2014年间所有接受急性A型主动脉夹层手术的患者。将曾接受心脏手术的患者与未接受过心脏手术的患者进行比较。进行单变量和多变量统计分析,以确定30天死亡率和早期主要不良事件(一个次要复合终点,包括30天死亡率、围手术期卒中、术后心脏骤停或新发透析)的预测因素。
共纳入1159例患者,其中40例(3.5%)曾接受心脏手术。曾接受心脏手术的患者30天死亡率更高(30%对17.8%,P = 0.049),中期生存率更差(5年时为51.7%对71.2%,对数秩检验P = 0.。020),主要不良事件的未调整患病率更高(52.5%对35.7%,P = 0.030)。在多变量分析中,既往心脏手术与30天死亡率(比值比0.78;95%可信区间,0.30 - 2.07;P = 0.624)或主要不良事件(比值比1.07;95%可信区间,0.45 - 2.55,P = 0.879)无关。
曾接受心脏手术的患者急性A型主动脉夹层手术后主要不良事件更常见。既往心脏手术本身并非不良事件的独立预测因素,尽管样本量小无法得出明确结论。既往心脏手术不应成为急诊手术的阻碍。