• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

保乳手术(肿瘤整形术和胸壁穿支皮瓣部分乳房重建)与乳房切除术的引流比较研究。

A Comparative Study of Drain in Oncoplastic Breast Conserving Surgery (Therapeutic Mammaplasty and Chest Wall Perforator Flap Partial Breast Reconstruction) vs. Mastectomy.

机构信息

The University of Cambridge, The Old Schools, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

Cambridge University Hospitals, Breast Unit, Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Clin Breast Cancer. 2022 Aug;22(6):619-627. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2022.05.003. Epub 2022 May 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.clbc.2022.05.003
PMID:35688784
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Increasingly, breast surgery is same day or 23-hour day-case surgery. Discharge criteria need to ensure patient safety outside hospital. We explore some of the evolving day-case factors in oncoplastic breast surgery (OBS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Available data of BMI and drain usage of an OBS practice (Nov 2014-Oct 2019) were reviewed. These were correlated with length of stay (LoS) and complications. Statistical analysis was performed using R programming language; Pearson's correlation, χ test, and Welch's 2 sample t test.

RESULTS

Of 188 patients in the study, drain usage was highest following mastectomy (62%) followed by partial reconstruction and mammaplasty. Drain was associated with increased seroma rates in all three operations. Its use in the partial reconstruction group was associated with significantly longer mean LoS with drain vs. those without drain (0.93 vs. 0.45 day, P = .009). Drain was associated with nonsignificantly longer LoS in both mammaplasty (1.57 vs. 1.00 day, P = .0708) and mastectomy (1.08 vs. 0.927 day, P = .685) groups. The mean BMI across all patients was 27.5, lowest in partial reconstruction (25.31), highest in mammaplasty (31.79), and 27.1 in mastectomy.

CONCLUSION

Drain use did not correlate directly with occurrence of seroma. However, overall, it was associated increased LoS, being significant in the partial reconstruction group. The temporal trend over the dataset shows numerically less drain usage in the latter half of series across all procedures with decreasing LoS. Minimal drain use may allow more day-case OBS.

摘要

背景

越来越多的乳房手术是当天或 23 小时的日间手术。出院标准需要确保患者在医院外的安全。我们探讨了一些不断发展的日间手术因素在肿瘤整形乳房手术(OBS)中的作用。

材料和方法

回顾了 2014 年 11 月至 2019 年 10 月 OBS 实践中 BMI 和引流管使用的数据。这些数据与住院时间(LoS)和并发症相关。使用 R 编程语言进行统计分析;Pearson 相关,χ检验和 Welch 双样本 t 检验。

结果

在研究的 188 例患者中,引流管的使用在乳房切除术(62%)后最高,其次是部分重建和乳房成形术。在所有三种手术中,引流管的使用与血清肿发生率的增加有关。在部分重建组中,使用引流管与未使用引流管的患者相比,平均 LoS 明显延长(0.93 与 0.45 天,P=0.009)。引流管在乳房成形术(1.57 与 1.00 天,P=0.0708)和乳房切除术(1.08 与 0.927 天,P=0.685)组中与 LoS 延长无显著相关性。所有患者的平均 BMI 为 27.5,其中部分重建组最低(25.31),乳房成形术组最高(31.79),乳房切除术组为 27.1。

结论

引流管的使用与血清肿的发生没有直接相关。然而,总的来说,它与较长的 LoS 有关,在部分重建组中具有显著意义。在整个数据集的时间趋势中,在所有手术中,后半部分的引流管使用量呈下降趋势,LoS 也呈下降趋势。最小的引流管使用可能允许更多的日间 OBS。

相似文献

1
A Comparative Study of Drain in Oncoplastic Breast Conserving Surgery (Therapeutic Mammaplasty and Chest Wall Perforator Flap Partial Breast Reconstruction) vs. Mastectomy.保乳手术(肿瘤整形术和胸壁穿支皮瓣部分乳房重建)与乳房切除术的引流比较研究。
Clin Breast Cancer. 2022 Aug;22(6):619-627. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2022.05.003. Epub 2022 May 6.
2
Outcomes of Volume Replacement Oncoplastic Breast-Conserving Surgery Using Chest Wall Perforator Flaps: Comparison with Volume Displacement Oncoplastic Surgery and Total Breast Reconstruction.应用胸壁穿支皮瓣进行容积置换保乳整形术的疗效:与容积移位保乳整形术和全乳重建术的比较。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020 Jul;146(1):14-27. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006911.
3
Obese Women Experience Fewer Complications after Oncoplastic Breast Repair following Partial Mastectomy Than after Immediate Total Breast Reconstruction.与即刻全乳重建相比,肥胖女性保乳手术后行肿瘤整形乳房修复的并发症更少。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Mar;137(3):777-791. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000479939.69211.19.
4
Oncoplastic and reconstructive surgery of the breast.乳房肿瘤整形与重建外科。
Breast. 2013 Aug;22 Suppl 2:S100-5. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2013.07.019.
5
Systematic review of partial breast reconstruction with pedicled perforator artery flaps: Clinical, oncological and cosmetic outcomes.带蒂穿支动脉皮瓣乳房部分重建术的系统评价:临床、肿瘤学和美容学结果。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021 Aug;47(8):1883-1890. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.03.249. Epub 2021 Apr 13.
6
The drain game: abdominal drains for deep inferior epigastric perforator breast reconstruction.引流游戏:用于腹壁下动脉穿支皮瓣乳房再造术的腹部引流管。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2014 Jul;67(7):946-50. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2014.03.020. Epub 2014 Mar 26.
7
Outcomes of Volume Replacement Oncoplastic Breast-Conserving Surgery Using Chest Wall Perforator Flaps: Comparison with Volume Displacement Oncoplastic Surgery and Total Breast Reconstruction.采用胸壁穿支皮瓣的容量替代肿瘤整形保乳手术的疗效:与容量置换肿瘤整形手术及全乳重建的比较。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021 May 1;147(5):878e-879e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000007809.
8
Outcomes of Volume Replacement Oncoplastic Breast-Conserving Surgery Using Chest Wall Perforator Flaps: Comparison with Volume Displacement Oncoplastic Surgery and Total Breast Reconstruction.使用胸壁穿支皮瓣进行容量替代肿瘤整形保乳手术的结果:与容量置换肿瘤整形手术及全乳重建的比较。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021 Jun 1;147(6):1057e-1058e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000007917.
9
Reply: Outcomes of Volume Replacement Oncoplastic Breast-Conserving Surgery Using Chest Wall Perforator Flaps: Comparison with Volume Displacement Oncoplastic Surgery and Total Breast Reconstruction.回复:使用胸壁穿支皮瓣的容量替代肿瘤整形保乳手术的结果:与容量置换肿瘤整形手术及全乳重建的比较。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021 May 1;147(5):879e-880e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000007810.
10
Reply: Outcomes of Volume Replacement Oncoplastic Breast-Conserving Surgery Using Chest Wall Perforator Flaps: Comparison with Volume Displacement Oncoplastic Surgery and Total Breast Reconstruction.回复:采用胸壁穿支皮瓣进行容量替代肿瘤整形保乳手术的结果:与容量置换肿瘤整形手术及全乳重建的比较。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021 Jun 1;147(6):1058e-1059e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000007918.

引用本文的文献

1
Chest wall perforator flap reconstruction in breast conserving surgery: quality of life and limited complications in outpatient treatment.保乳手术中胸壁穿支皮瓣重建:门诊治疗的生活质量及有限并发症
World J Surg Oncol. 2025 Jan 23;23(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12957-024-03638-5.