School of Health Systems and Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Private Bag X323, Arcadia, 0007 City of Tshwane, South Africa.
Department of Human Nutrition, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Private Bag X323, Arcadia, 0007 City of Tshwane, South Africa.
Prim Care Diabetes. 2022 Aug;16(4):509-514. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2022.05.012. Epub 2022 Jun 9.
To assess barriers to insulin therapy among people with type 2 diabetes after adapting the Insulin Treatment Appraisal Scale (ITAS) to the South African context.
A panel of experts reviewed the original ITAS for clarity and relevance to the South African context. The ITAS was administered to 253 adults with type 2 diabetes attending diabetes outpatient clinics in the Tshwane Metropolitan Municipality. Internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) was tested and construct validity was examined using exploratory factor analysis (EFA). PIR was appraised in insulin users and non-users.
The EFA revealed that the adapted ITAS had a two-factor structure, similar to the original scale, with acceptable internal consistency (α = 0.85). Insulin-using participants had significantly less negative attitudes to insulin therapy than non-users (40.7 ± 7.1 vs. 51.5 ± 11.2, p < 0.001). Compared to participants who used insulin, participants who did not use insulin were afraid of injecting themselves with a needle (71% vs. 11%, p < 0.001) and saw insulin treatment as a sign of worsening diabetes (63% vs. 29%, p < 0.001).
Consistent with previous studies, participants who were not using insulin had more negative beliefs and attitudes towards insulin treatment than those who were already using insulin. South African clinicians should use the ITAS to assess positive and negative perceptions regarding insulin therapy in both insulin-naïve and insulin-treated people, to evaluate interventions to reduce PIR and improve treatment outcomes.
改编胰岛素治疗评估量表(ITAS)以适应南非国情,评估 2 型糖尿病患者接受胰岛素治疗的障碍。
一组专家对原始 ITAS 进行了审查,以评估其在南非背景下的清晰度和相关性。在茨瓦内大都市自治市的糖尿病门诊诊所,对 253 名 2 型糖尿病成人患者进行了 ITAS 管理。测试了内部一致性(Cronbach's alpha),并通过探索性因素分析(EFA)检查了结构有效性。在胰岛素使用者和非使用者中评估了 PIR。
EFA 显示,改编后的 ITAS 具有类似于原始量表的两因素结构,具有可接受的内部一致性(α=0.85)。与非使用者相比,使用胰岛素的参与者对胰岛素治疗的负面态度明显较少(40.7±7.1 与 51.5±11.2,p<0.001)。与使用胰岛素的参与者相比,不使用胰岛素的参与者更害怕用针头给自己注射(71%与 11%,p<0.001),并认为胰岛素治疗是糖尿病恶化的标志(63%与 29%,p<0.001)。
与先前的研究一致,未使用胰岛素的参与者对胰岛素治疗的负面信念和态度比对已经使用胰岛素的参与者更多。南非临床医生应使用 ITAS 评估胰岛素治疗的正性和负性认知,以评估干预措施,减少 PIR 并改善治疗结果。