• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

改善性别肯定手术术语:一项多中心患者调查。

Improving Gender-Affirming Surgery Terminology: A Multicenter Patient Survey.

机构信息

From the Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN.

Section of Plastic Surgery, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI.

出版信息

Ann Plast Surg. 2022 Jun 1;88(5 Suppl 5):S478-S480. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000003122. Epub 2022 Feb 18.

DOI:10.1097/SAP.0000000000003122
PMID:35690942
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To promote patient safety and build trust, plastic surgeons must use patient-centered language when discussing gender-affirming surgery. However, the existing terminology has not been evaluated from a patient perspective. This study sought to understand how gender-affirming surgery patients from 3 US geographic regions perceive common terminology.

METHODS

An anonymous, 24-item electronic survey was distributed to gender-affirming surgery patients seen in Tennessee, Colorado, and California. After institutional review board exemption, the survey instrument was pretested and piloted with gender-affirming surgery patients. Internal consistency was assessed by computation of Cronbach α (0.87).

RESULTS

A total of 306 participants completed the survey: 68 from a Tennessee academic center (response rate, 56%), 131 from a California private practice (response rate, 8%), and 107 from a Colorado academic center (response rate, 53%). A greater proportion of respondents felt the terms "top surgery" and "bottom surgery" were appropriate (83% and 82%, respectively) relative to "chest surgery" and "genital surgery" (41% and 30%, respectively). More respondents favored the phrase "gender-affirming surgery" than "gender-confirming surgery" (86% vs 67%). Nearly half (43%) perceived the phrase "sex reassignment surgery" as inappropriate. Most respondents (80%) preferred their surgeon ask for their pronouns.

CONCLUSIONS

Optimizing communication is an actionable way for plastic surgeons to improve the healthcare experiences of gender-affirming surgery patients. "Top surgery" and "bottom surgery" are favored terms, and "gender-affirming surgery" is the preferred name for this discipline. Language preferences should be openly discussed with each patient to ensure professional communication.

摘要

背景

为了促进患者安全并建立信任,整形外科医生在讨论性别肯定手术时必须使用以患者为中心的语言。然而,现有的术语尚未从患者的角度进行评估。本研究旨在了解来自美国 3 个地理区域的性别肯定手术患者如何看待常见的术语。

方法

向在田纳西州、科罗拉多州和加利福尼亚州就诊的性别肯定手术患者分发了一份匿名的 24 项电子调查。在获得机构审查委员会豁免后,对调查工具进行了预测试,并在性别肯定手术患者中进行了试点。通过计算 Cronbach α(0.87)来评估内部一致性。

结果

共有 306 名参与者完成了调查:田纳西州学术中心 68 名(回应率为 56%),加利福尼亚州私人诊所 131 名(回应率为 8%),科罗拉多州学术中心 107 名(回应率为 53%)。与“胸部手术”和“生殖器手术”(分别为 41%和 30%)相比,更多的受访者认为“胸部手术”和“生殖器手术”更合适(分别为 83%和 82%)。与“性别确认手术”相比,更多的受访者更喜欢“性别肯定手术”(86%对 67%)。近一半(43%)的受访者认为“性别重置手术”一词不合适。大多数受访者(80%)希望他们的医生询问他们的代词。

结论

优化沟通是整形外科医生改善性别肯定手术患者医疗体验的一种可行方法。“胸部手术”和“生殖器手术”是首选术语,“性别肯定手术”是该学科的首选名称。应与每位患者公开讨论语言偏好,以确保专业沟通。

相似文献

1
Improving Gender-Affirming Surgery Terminology: A Multicenter Patient Survey.改善性别肯定手术术语:一项多中心患者调查。
Ann Plast Surg. 2022 Jun 1;88(5 Suppl 5):S478-S480. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000003122. Epub 2022 Feb 18.
2
Comprehensiveness of Online Information in Gender-Affirming Surgery: Current Trends and Future Directions in Academic Plastic Surgery.性别确认手术在线信息的全面性:整形外科学术领域的当前趋势与未来方向
J Sex Med. 2022 May;19(5):846-851. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2022.02.014. Epub 2022 Mar 11.
3
Barriers To Finding A Gender Affirming Surgeon.寻找性别肯定外科医生的障碍。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2020 Dec;44(6):2300-2307. doi: 10.1007/s00266-020-01883-z. Epub 2020 Jul 21.
4
Are We Teaching Evidence-Based and Inclusive Practices in Gender-Affirming Care? Perspectives From Plastic Surgery In-Service Examinations.我们是否在教授基于证据的包容性实践以进行性别肯定护理?来自整形外科学位后考试的观点。
J Grad Med Educ. 2023 Oct;15(5):587-591. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-22-00611.1.
5
Receipt of Gender-Affirming Surgeries Among Transgender and Gender Diverse Veterans. transgender 和 gender diverse veterans 中接受性别肯定手术的情况。
J Gen Intern Med. 2024 Nov;39(15):3042-3051. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-08917-1. Epub 2024 Jul 26.
6
The Current State of Gender-Affirming Surgery Training in Plastic Surgery Residency Programs as Reported by Residency Program Directors.整形外科研修项目主任报告的整形外科研修项目中性别肯定手术培训的现状。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020 Feb;145(2):567-574. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006426.
7
Patterns of Perioperative Hormone Therapy for Gender-Affirming Surgery.围手术期激素治疗用于性别肯定手术的模式。
Ann Plast Surg. 2024 Apr 1;92(4):442-446. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000003820. Epub 2024 Jan 25.
8
Shallow-depth vaginoplasty: preoperative goals, postoperative satisfaction, and why shallow-depth vaginoplasty should be offered as a standard feminizing genital gender-affirming surgery option.浅深度阴道成形术:术前目标、术后满意度,以及为何应将浅深度阴道成形术作为一种标准的女性化生殖器性别肯定手术选择提供。
J Sex Med. 2023 Oct 31;20(11):1333-1343. doi: 10.1093/jsxmed/qdad111.
9
Decision making in metoidioplasty and phalloplasty gender-affirming surgery: a mixed methods study.性别肯定手术中阴蒂成形术和阴茎成形术的决策:混合方法研究。
J Sex Med. 2023 Jun 28;20(7):1032-1043. doi: 10.1093/jsxmed/qdad063.
10
Enhancing Gender-Affirming Provider Communication to Increase Health Care Access and Utilization Among Transgender Men and Trans-Masculine Non-Binary Individuals.增强性别认同提供者的沟通,以增加跨性别男性和跨性别非二元个体的医疗保健机会和利用。
LGBT Health. 2020 Aug/Sep;7(6):292-304. doi: 10.1089/lgbt.2019.0294. Epub 2020 Jun 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Embodied Affirmation: Experiences with Gender-Affirming Top Surgery.具身肯定:性别肯定性胸部手术的经历
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2025 Jul 14. doi: 10.1007/s00266-025-05047-9.
2
A Comparative Analysis of Full and Partial Gender-Affirming Facial Surgeries Surgical Complications and Trends: Insights from a NSQIP Study.全性别确认面部手术与部分性别确认面部手术的手术并发症及趋势比较分析:来自国家外科质量改进计划(NSQIP)研究的见解
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2025 May 9. doi: 10.1007/s00266-025-04905-w.
3
Comparative Outcome Study of Gynecomastia Surgery and Gender-Affirming Mastectomy With 100% Nipple Preservation.
保留100%乳头的男性乳房肥大症手术与性别确认乳房切除术的比较结果研究
Ann Plast Surg. 2025 Jul 1;95(1):e1-e17. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000004308. Epub 2025 Feb 17.
4
Breast and cervical cancer in transgender men: literature review and a case report.transgender男性的乳腺癌和宫颈癌:文献综述及病例报告
Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2024 Aug 10;16:17588359241259466. doi: 10.1177/17588359241259466. eCollection 2024.
5
Are We Teaching Evidence-Based and Inclusive Practices in Gender-Affirming Care? Perspectives From Plastic Surgery In-Service Examinations.我们是否在教授基于证据的包容性实践以进行性别肯定护理?来自整形外科学位后考试的观点。
J Grad Med Educ. 2023 Oct;15(5):587-591. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-22-00611.1.
6
Exploring communication preferences of trans and gender diverse individuals-A qualitative study.探讨跨性别和性别多样化个体的沟通偏好——一项定性研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 23;18(8):e0284959. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284959. eCollection 2023.