Suppr超能文献

学术美容外科实践中的模式:人群差异与手术偏好。

Patterns in Academic Cosmetic Surgery Practice: Population Differences and Procedure Preferences.

机构信息

From the College of Medicine.

Division of Plastic Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC.

出版信息

Ann Plast Surg. 2022 Jun 1;88(5 Suppl 5):S490-S494. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000003159.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Although growth in cosmetic surgery remains constant in the private setting, academic cosmetic surgery practices are often underdeveloped. Our study aims to determine which patient populations access academic cosmetic surgery services.

METHODS

The 2018 Health Care Utilization Project Nationwide Ambulatory Surgery Sample database was used for data analysis. Encounters for the following American Society of Plastic Surgery top 5 procedures for 2020 were selected: blepharoplasty, breast augmentation, liposuction, rhinoplasty, and rhytidectomy. Patient encounter data were collected because it relates to median income, geographic location, and primary payer status.

RESULTS

The 2018 Nationwide Ambulatory Surgery Sample data set contained 44,078 encounters at academic surgical centers for the procedures listed previously. Low-income patients account for 13.7% of academic cosmetic surgery encounters compared with 37.9% for high-income patients. Breast augmentation rates are higher among low-income patients (20.5% vs 17.2%, P < 0.001), and high-income patients undergo rhytidectomy more frequently (5.7% vs 3.0%, P < 0.001). In the academic setting, patients from large metropolitan areas encompass the majority of cosmetic encounters (71.0%), and these patients are more likely to proceed with rhinoplasty, rhytidectomy, and liposuction procedures (P < 0.001). Patients from smaller metropolitan areas undergo blepharoplasty more frequently compared with those from larger metropolitan areas (56.4% vs 41.8%, P < 0.001). Self-pay and privately insured patients comprise the majority of academic cosmetic surgery encounters (40.8% and 29.9%, respectively). Eighty-eight percent of Medicare patients within this cohort underwent blepharoplasty, whereas self-pay patients accessed breast augmentation, liposuction, and rhytidectomy more often than other insured patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Income status, patient location, and primary payer status play an important role in academic cosmetic surgery access rates and procedure preferences. Academic cosmetic practices can use these insights to tailor their services to the populations they serve.

摘要

目的

尽管私人机构的整容手术业务持续增长,但学术性整容手术业务往往仍不够发达。我们的研究旨在确定哪些患者群体可以获得学术性整容手术服务。

方法

本研究使用了 2018 年全国门诊手术项目全国门诊手术样本数据库进行数据分析。选择了 2020 年美国整形外科学会排名前五的手术项目,包括眼睑成形术、隆胸术、抽脂术、隆鼻术和除皱术。收集患者就诊数据是因为它与中位数收入、地理位置和主要支付者状况有关。

结果

2018 年全国门诊手术样本数据集包含了学术外科中心进行上述手术的 44078 例就诊。低收入患者占学术性整容手术就诊的 13.7%,而高收入患者占 37.9%。低收入患者隆胸率较高(20.5%比 17.2%,P<0.001),高收入患者更频繁地接受除皱术(5.7%比 3.0%,P<0.001)。在学术环境中,来自大都市地区的患者占据了大多数整容手术就诊(71.0%),这些患者更有可能接受隆鼻术、除皱术和抽脂术(P<0.001)。来自较小都市地区的患者更频繁地接受眼睑成形术,而不是来自较大都市地区的患者(56.4%比 41.8%,P<0.001)。自付和私人保险患者构成了学术性整容手术就诊的主要部分(分别为 40.8%和 29.9%)。在这一队列中,88%的医疗保险患者接受了眼睑成形术,而自付患者比其他保险患者更频繁地接受隆胸术、抽脂术和除皱术。

结论

收入状况、患者所在地和主要支付者状况在获得学术性整容手术的机会和手术偏好方面发挥着重要作用。学术性整容实践可以利用这些见解,根据其所服务的人群来调整其服务。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验