数字 PCR 在确定 Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 检测试剂盒 E 基因阴性和 N2 基因阳性结果的可靠性中的应用。
Application of digital PCR to determine the reliability of Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 assay with envelope (E) gene negative and nucleocapsid (N2) gene positive results.
机构信息
Department of Microbiology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong.
Department of Microbiology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong.
出版信息
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2022 Aug;103(4):115726. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2022.115726. Epub 2022 May 20.
Abstract
This study used digital polymerase chain reaction (dPCR) to determine whether envelope (E) gene-negative and nucleocapsid (N2) gene-positive (E-N+) results obtained with the Cepheid Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 assay are reliable. Using droplet digital PCR results as a reference, 18 of 22 E-N+ samples with a low viral load (81.8%) were identified as true positives.
摘要
本研究使用数字聚合酶链反应（dPCR）来确定使用 Cepheid Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 检测试剂盒获得的包膜（E）基因阴性和核衣壳（N2）基因阳性（E-N+）结果是否可靠。以液滴数字 PCR 结果为参考，22 份低病毒载量的 E-N+样本中有 18 份（81.8%）被确认为真正的阳性。
相似文献
1
Application of digital PCR to determine the reliability of Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 assay with envelope (E) gene negative and nucleocapsid (N2) gene positive results.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2022 Aug;103(4):115726. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2022.115726. Epub 2022 May 20.
2
A needle in the haystack? Assessing the significance of envelope (E) gene-negative, nucleocapsid (N2) gene-positive SARS-CoV-2 detection by the Cepheid Xpert Xpress SARS-COV-2 assay.
J Clin Virol. 2020 Dec;133:104683. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104683. Epub 2020 Oct 29.
3
Clinical Evaluation of BioFire COVID-19 Test, BioFire Respiratory Panel 2.1, and Cepheid Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 Assays for Sample-to-Answer Detection of SARS-CoV-2.
Genes (Basel). 2023 Jan 16;14(1):233. doi: 10.3390/genes14010233.
4
Sample pooling on the Cepheid Xpert® Xpress SARS-CoV-2 assay.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2021 Feb;99(2):115238. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2020.115238. Epub 2020 Oct 15.
5
Multi-center evaluation of cepheid xpert® xpress SARS-CoV-2 point-of-care test during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.
J Clin Virol. 2020 Jul;128:104426. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104426. Epub 2020 May 11.
6
Diagnostic accuracy of the Cepheid Xpert Xpress and the Abbott ID NOW assay for rapid detection of SARS-CoV-2: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
J Med Virol. 2021 Jul;93(7):4523-4531. doi: 10.1002/jmv.26994. Epub 2021 May 3.
7
Presumptive positive with the Cepheid Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 assay due to N mutations in the Delta variant.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2022 Jul;103(3):115699. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2022.115699. Epub 2022 Apr 21.
8
When rare becomes common: N2 gene-positive, E gene-negative SARS-CoV-2 PCR results between 2021 and 2022.
J Clin Virol Plus. 2023 Jun;3(2):100152. doi: 10.1016/j.jcvp.2023.100152. Epub 2023 May 12.
9
Harmonization of SARS-CoV-2 reverse transcription quantitative PCR tests to the first WHO international standard for SARS-CoV-2 RNA.
J Clin Virol. 2022 Sep;154:105242. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2022.105242. Epub 2022 Jul 16.
10
Comparison of Positive/Inconclusive Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 with the Standard M nCoV Real-Time Detection.
Clin Lab. 2023 Oct 1;69(10). doi: 10.7754/Clin.Lab.2023.230546.
引用本文的文献
1
Technical evaluation of a novel digital PCR platform for detecting mutations in NSCLC archived plasma specimens.
J Liq Biopsy. 2023 Dec 19;3:100133. doi: 10.1016/j.jlb.2023.100133. eCollection 2024 Mar.
2
Multiplex digital profiling of DNA methylation heterogeneity for sensitive and cost-effective cancer detection in low-volume liquid biopsies.
Sci Adv. 2024 Nov 22;10(47):eadp1704. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adp1704.
3
When rare becomes common: N2 gene-positive, E gene-negative SARS-CoV-2 PCR results between 2021 and 2022.
J Clin Virol Plus. 2023 Jun;3(2):100152. doi: 10.1016/j.jcvp.2023.100152. Epub 2023 May 12.
4
Rapid Evaluation of the Xpert Xpress CoV-2 and Xpert Xpress CoV-2/Flu/RSV Tests.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Dec 22;13(1):34. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13010034.
本文引用的文献
1
Analytical and Clinical Performance of Droplet Digital PCR in the Detection and Quantification of SARS-CoV-2.
Mol Diagn Ther. 2021 Sep;25(5):617-628. doi: 10.1007/s40291-021-00547-1. Epub 2021 Jul 28.
2
Digital droplet PCR accurately quantifies SARS-CoV-2 viral load from crude lysate without nucleic acid purification.
Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 12;11(1):780. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-80715-1.
3
Highly accurate and sensitive diagnostic detection of SARS-CoV-2 by digital PCR.
Talanta. 2021 Mar 1;224:121726. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2020.121726. Epub 2020 Oct 27.
4
Rapid adaptation and continuous performance evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 envelope gene (E-gene) real-time RT-PCR assays to support the hospital surge in test demand.
J Med Virol. 2021 Mar;93(3):1824-1827. doi: 10.1002/jmv.26660. Epub 2020 Nov 22.
5
A needle in the haystack? Assessing the significance of envelope (E) gene-negative, nucleocapsid (N2) gene-positive SARS-CoV-2 detection by the Cepheid Xpert Xpress SARS-COV-2 assay.
J Clin Virol. 2020 Dec;133:104683. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104683. Epub 2020 Oct 29.
6
Detection of SARS-COV N2 Gene: Very low amounts of viral RNA or false positive?
J Clin Virol. 2020 Dec;133:104660. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104660. Epub 2020 Oct 14.
7
Detection and quantification of SARS-CoV-2 by droplet digital PCR in real-time PCR negative nasopharyngeal swabs from suspected COVID-19 patients.
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 8;15(9):e0236311. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236311. eCollection 2020.
8
Evaluation on testing of deep throat saliva and lower respiratory tract specimens with Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 assay.
J Clin Virol. 2020 Oct;131:104593. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104593. Epub 2020 Aug 16.
9
Sensitivity assessment of droplet digital PCR for SARS-CoV-2 detection.
Int J Mol Med. 2020 Sep;46(3):957-964. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2020.4673. Epub 2020 Jul 13.
10
ddPCR: a more accurate tool for SARS-CoV-2 detection in low viral load specimens.
Emerg Microbes Infect. 2020 Dec;9(1):1259-1268. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2020.1772678.
Zotero 插件