• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于 SARS-CoV-2 检测的液滴数字 PCR 灵敏度评估。

Sensitivity assessment of droplet digital PCR for SARS-CoV-2 detection.

机构信息

Epidemiology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori 'Fondazione G. Pascale', I‑80131 Naples, Italy.

Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, Section of Microbiology, University of Catania, I‑95123 Catania, Italy.

出版信息

Int J Mol Med. 2020 Sep;46(3):957-964. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2020.4673. Epub 2020 Jul 13.

DOI:10.3892/ijmm.2020.4673
PMID:32705153
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7388836/
Abstract

Reverse transcription‑quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT‑qPCR) is the gold standard method for the diagnosis of COVID‑19 infection. Due to pre‑analytical and technical limitations, samples with low viral load are often misdiagnosed as false‑negative samples. Therefore, it is important to evaluate other strategies able to overcome the limits of RT‑qPCR. Blinded swab samples from two individuals diagnosed positive and negative for COVID‑19 were analyzed by droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) and RT‑qPCR in order to assess the sensitivity of both methods. Intercalation chemistries and a World Health Organization (WHO)/Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)‑approved probe for the SARS‑CoV‑2 N gene were used. SYBR‑Green RT‑qPCR is not able to diagnose as positive samples with low viral load, while, TaqMan Probe RT‑qPCR gave positive signals at very late Ct values. On the contrary, ddPCR showed higher sensitivity rate compared to RT‑qPCR and both EvaGreen and probe ddPCR were able to recognize the sample with low viral load as positive even at 10‑fold diluted concentration. In conclusion, ddPCR shows higher sensitivity and specificity compared to RT‑qPCR for the diagnosis of COVID‑19 infection in false‑negative samples with low viral load. Therefore, ddPCR is strongly recommended in clinical practice for the diagnosis of COVID‑19 and the follow‑up of positive patients until complete remission.

摘要

逆转录-定量聚合酶链反应 (RT-qPCR) 是诊断 COVID-19 感染的金标准方法。由于分析前和技术限制,病毒载量低的样本常被误诊为假阴性样本。因此,评估其他能够克服 RT-qPCR 局限性的策略很重要。为了评估两种方法的灵敏度,对经临床诊断为 COVID-19 阳性和阴性的两个人的盲拭子样本进行了数字液滴 PCR (ddPCR) 和 RT-qPCR 分析。使用了嵌入化学法和世界卫生组织 (WHO)/疾病控制与预防中心 (CDC) 批准的 SARS-CoV-2 N 基因探针。SYBR-Green RT-qPCR 无法诊断病毒载量低的阳性样本,而 TaqMan 探针 RT-qPCR 在 Ct 值很晚时才给出阳性信号。相反,ddPCR 与 RT-qPCR 相比显示出更高的灵敏度,EvaGreen 和探针 ddPCR 均能够识别低病毒载量的样本为阳性,即使在 10 倍稀释浓度下也是如此。总之,ddPCR 显示出比 RT-qPCR 更高的灵敏度和特异性,可用于诊断病毒载量低的假阴性 COVID-19 感染样本。因此,ddPCR 强烈推荐用于 COVID-19 的诊断和阳性患者的随访,直至完全缓解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d25/7388836/1daf4df33b77/IJMM-46-03-0957-g03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d25/7388836/896d56102ddb/IJMM-46-03-0957-g00.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d25/7388836/738d29843be1/IJMM-46-03-0957-g01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d25/7388836/50a53b79967b/IJMM-46-03-0957-g02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d25/7388836/1daf4df33b77/IJMM-46-03-0957-g03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d25/7388836/896d56102ddb/IJMM-46-03-0957-g00.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d25/7388836/738d29843be1/IJMM-46-03-0957-g01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d25/7388836/50a53b79967b/IJMM-46-03-0957-g02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d25/7388836/1daf4df33b77/IJMM-46-03-0957-g03.jpg

相似文献

1
Sensitivity assessment of droplet digital PCR for SARS-CoV-2 detection.用于 SARS-CoV-2 检测的液滴数字 PCR 灵敏度评估。
Int J Mol Med. 2020 Sep;46(3):957-964. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2020.4673. Epub 2020 Jul 13.
2
Limits of Detection of 6 Approved RT-PCR Kits for the Novel SARS-Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2).6种获批的新型严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)试剂盒的检测限
Clin Chem. 2020 Jul 1;66(7):977-979. doi: 10.1093/clinchem/hvaa099.
3
Evaluation of seven commercial SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection kits based on real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in China.中国七种基于实时聚合酶链反应(PCR)的商用严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)RNA检测试剂盒的评估。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2020 Jul 13;58(9):e149-e153. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2020-0271. Print 2020 Aug 27.
4
Automated SARS-COV-2 RNA extraction from patient nasopharyngeal samples using a modified DNA extraction kit for high throughput testing.使用改良的DNA提取试剂盒从患者鼻咽样本中自动提取SARS-CoV-2 RNA,用于高通量检测。
Ann Saudi Med. 2020 Sep-Oct;40(5):373-381. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2020.373. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
5
Detection and quantification of SARS-CoV-2 by droplet digital PCR in real-time PCR negative nasopharyngeal swabs from suspected COVID-19 patients.实时荧光定量 PCR 阴性的疑似 COVID-19 患者鼻咽拭子中通过液滴数字 PCR 检测和定量 SARS-CoV-2。
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 8;15(9):e0236311. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236311. eCollection 2020.
6
ddPCR: a more accurate tool for SARS-CoV-2 detection in low viral load specimens.ddPCR:一种更精确的检测低病毒载量样本中 SARS-CoV-2 的工具。
Emerg Microbes Infect. 2020 Dec;9(1):1259-1268. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2020.1772678.
7
Novel One-Step Single-Tube Nested Quantitative Real-Time PCR Assay for Highly Sensitive Detection of SARS-CoV-2.新型一步单管巢式实时定量 PCR 检测法,用于高灵敏度检测 SARS-CoV-2。
Anal Chem. 2020 Jul 7;92(13):9399-9404. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.0c01884. Epub 2020 Jun 15.
8
SARS-CoV-2 and RT-PCR in asymptomatic patients: Results of a cohort of workers at El Dorado International Airport in Bogotá, 2020.无症状患者中的严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)与逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR):2020年波哥大埃尔多拉多国际机场一组工作人员的结果
Biomedica. 2020 Oct 30;40(Supl. 2):166-172. doi: 10.7705/biomedica.5802.
9
Dynamic change process of target genes by RT-PCR testing of SARS-Cov-2 during the course of a Coronavirus Disease 2019 patient.SARS-CoV-2 目标基因的动态变化过程通过新冠肺炎患者病程中的 RT-PCR 检测。
Clin Chim Acta. 2020 Jul;506:172-175. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2020.03.032. Epub 2020 Mar 27.
10
The genetic sequence, origin, and diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2.SARS-CoV-2 的基因序列、起源和诊断。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2020 Sep;39(9):1629-1635. doi: 10.1007/s10096-020-03899-4. Epub 2020 Apr 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Digital PCR outperforms quantitative real-time PCR for the detection and quantification of major periodontal pathobionts.在主要牙周病原菌的检测和定量方面,数字PCR优于定量实时PCR。
J Oral Microbiol. 2025 Jul 23;17(1):2537439. doi: 10.1080/20002297.2025.2537439. eCollection 2025.
2
Droplet Digital PCR or Real-Time PCR as a Method for Quantifying SARS-CoV-2 RNA in Plasma-Is There a Difference?采用数字液滴PCR或实时PCR定量血浆中SARS-CoV-2 RNA的方法——有差异吗?
Viruses. 2025 May 28;17(6):772. doi: 10.3390/v17060772.
3
Rapid and Sensitive Digital Droplet PCR Assays for Detecting HPV16 DNA in Liquid Biopsies.

本文引用的文献

1
COVID-19-A Novel Zoonotic Disease: A Review of the Disease, the Virus, and Public Health Measures.COVID-19 新型人畜共患病:疾病、病毒和公共卫生措施综述。
Asia Pac J Public Health. 2020 May;32(4):145-153. doi: 10.1177/1010539520931326. Epub 2020 May 30.
2
Assay Techniques and Test Development for COVID-19 Diagnosis.用于新冠病毒诊断的检测技术与测试开发
ACS Cent Sci. 2020 May 27;6(5):591-605. doi: 10.1021/acscentsci.0c00501. Epub 2020 Apr 30.
3
Towards effective COVID‑19 vaccines: Updates, perspectives and challenges (Review).
用于检测液体活检中HPV16 DNA的快速灵敏数字液滴PCR检测方法
J Med Virol. 2025 Jan;97(1):e70146. doi: 10.1002/jmv.70146.
4
Advances in Virus Biorecognition and Detection Techniques for the Surveillance and Prevention of Infectious Diseases.用于传染病监测与预防的病毒生物识别及检测技术进展
Biosensors (Basel). 2025 Mar 20;15(3):198. doi: 10.3390/bios15030198.
5
Surfaces environmental monitoring of SARS-CoV-2: Loop mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) and droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) in comparison with standard Reverse-Transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) techniques.严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)的表面环境监测:环介导等温扩增(LAMP)和液滴数字PCR(ddPCR)与标准逆转录定量聚合酶链反应(RT-qPCR)技术的比较
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 3;20(2):e0317228. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317228. eCollection 2025.
6
Development and Validation of One-Step Reverse Transcription-Droplet Digital PCR for Plum Pox Virus Detection and Quantification from Plant Purified RNA and Crude Extract.用于从植物纯化RNA和粗提物中检测和定量李痘病毒的一步法逆转录-液滴数字PCR的开发与验证
Plants (Basel). 2024 Nov 22;13(23):3276. doi: 10.3390/plants13233276.
7
COVID-19: An overview on possible transmission ways, sampling matrices and diagnosis.新型冠状病毒肺炎:关于可能的传播途径、采样基质和诊断的概述
Bioimpacts. 2024;14(6):29968. doi: 10.34172/bi.2024.29968. Epub 2024 Mar 12.
8
Extracellular RNAs from Whole Urine to Distinguish Prostate Cancer from Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.全尿外泌体 RNA 区分前列腺癌与前列腺增生。
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Sep 19;25(18):10079. doi: 10.3390/ijms251810079.
9
Robust Double Emulsions for Multicolor Fluorescence-Activated Cell Sorting.用于多色荧光激活细胞分选的稳健双乳液。
Anal Chem. 2024 Sep 17;96(37):14809-14818. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.4c02363. Epub 2024 Sep 4.
10
Quadruplex Droplet Digital PCR Assay for Screening and Quantification of SARS-CoV-2.用于 SARS-CoV-2 筛查和定量的四重液滴数字 PCR 分析。
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Jul 26;25(15):8157. doi: 10.3390/ijms25158157.
迈向有效的 COVID-19 疫苗:更新、观点和挑战(综述)。
Int J Mol Med. 2020 Jul;46(1):3-16. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2020.4596. Epub 2020 May 6.
4
COVID-19 outbreak: Migration, effects on society, global environment and prevention.新冠疫情爆发:移民、对社会的影响、全球环境和预防。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Aug 1;728:138882. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138882. Epub 2020 Apr 22.
5
Modulation of microRNA expression levels after naturally occurring asbestiform fibers exposure as a diagnostic biomarker of mesothelial neoplastic transformation.自然存在的石棉纤维暴露后 microRNA 表达水平的调节作为间皮瘤肿瘤转化的诊断生物标志物。
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2020 Jul 15;198:110640. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.110640. Epub 2020 Apr 21.
6
COVID‑19 in Northern Italy: An integrative overview of factors possibly influencing the sharp increase of the outbreak (Review).意大利北部的 COVID-19 疫情:可能影响疫情急剧爆发的因素综合概述(综述)。
Mol Med Rep. 2020 Jul;22(1):20-32. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2020.11079. Epub 2020 Apr 16.
7
Real-time RT-PCR in COVID-19 detection: issues affecting the results.实时逆转录聚合酶链反应在新冠病毒检测中的应用:影响结果的因素
Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2020 May;20(5):453-454. doi: 10.1080/14737159.2020.1757437. Epub 2020 Apr 22.
8
Limits of Detection of 6 Approved RT-PCR Kits for the Novel SARS-Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2).6种获批的新型严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)试剂盒的检测限
Clin Chem. 2020 Jul 1;66(7):977-979. doi: 10.1093/clinchem/hvaa099.
9
False negative of RT-PCR and prolonged nucleic acid conversion in COVID-19: Rather than recurrence.2019冠状病毒病中逆转录聚合酶链反应的假阴性及核酸转换延长:而非复发
J Med Virol. 2020 Oct;92(10):1755-1756. doi: 10.1002/jmv.25855. Epub 2020 Jul 11.
10
Laboratory Diagnosis of COVID-19: Current Issues and Challenges.新型冠状病毒肺炎的实验室诊断:当前的问题和挑战。
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 May 26;58(6). doi: 10.1128/JCM.00512-20.