Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; Department of Cardiology, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Am J Cardiol. 2022 Aug 15;177:90-99. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2022.04.060. Epub 2022 Jun 9.
Reduced left ventricular (LV) systolic function is associated with worse prognosis in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) treated with transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). We aimed to examine the changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) after TAVI among patients with varying baseline LVEF. Moreover, variables associated with lack of LVEF improvement were identified and the association with long-term outcomes was investigated. A total of 560 patients (age 80 ± 7 years, 53% men) with severe AS who underwent transfemoral TAVI between 2007 and 2019 were selected. LVEF was assessed from transthoracic echocardiography at baseline (before TAVI) and at 6 and 12 months after TAVI. Patients were stratified according to baseline LVEF: (1) LVEF ≥50%, (2) LVEF 40% to 49%, and (3) LVEF <40%. The clinical end point was ≥5% LVEF improvement. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Patients with baseline LVEF<40% showed greater increase in LVEF than those with baseline LVEF 40% to 49% and LVEF ≥50% (from 33% ± 6% to 43% ± 10%, p <0.001; from 45% ± 3% to 52% ± 8%, p <0.001; and from 58% ± 5% to 59% ± 7%, p = 0.012, respectively, p for interaction <0.001). Coronary artery disease (odds ratio [OR] 1.80 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.06 to 3.06], p = 0.031), myocardial infarction (OR 2.07 [95% CI 1.19 to 3.61], p = 0.010), and permanent pacemaker (OR: 1.93 [95% CI 1.25 to 3.00], p = 0.003) were independently associated with the lack of ≥5% LVEF improvement. During a median follow-up of 3.8 (interquartile range 2.6 to 5.2) years, 176 patients died (31%). Patients with ≥5% LVEF improvement had similar outcomes compared with those with <5% LVEF improvement (log-rank p = 0.89). In conclusion, patients with severe AS and baseline LVEF <40% had the greatest improvement in LVEF at 1-year follow-up after TAVI. Coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, and permanent pacemaker were associated with lack of LVEF improvement. However, LVEF improvement at 12 months was not associated with long-term outcomes.
左心室(LV)收缩功能降低与接受经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)治疗的严重主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)患者的预后较差相关。我们旨在研究不同基线左心室射血分数(LVEF)的患者在 TAVI 后的 LVEF 变化。此外,确定与 LVEF 改善不足相关的变量,并研究其与长期结果的关系。
选择了 2007 年至 2019 年间接受经股 TAVI 的 560 名(年龄 80 ± 7 岁,53%为男性)严重 AS 患者。基线(TAVI 前)和 TAVI 后 6 个月和 12 个月时使用经胸超声心动图评估 LVEF。根据基线 LVEF 将患者分层:(1)LVEF ≥50%,(2)LVEF 40%至 49%,和(3)LVEF <40%。临床终点为≥5%的 LVEF 改善。主要结局为全因死亡率。
基线 LVEF <40%的患者比基线 LVEF 40%至 49%和 LVEF ≥50%的患者的 LVEF 增加更大(从 33%±6%增加到 43%±10%,p<0.001;从 45%±3%增加到 52%±8%,p<0.001;和从 58%±5%增加到 59%±7%,p=0.012,p 交互作用<0.001)。冠状动脉疾病(比值比 [OR] 1.80 [95%置信区间(CI)1.06 至 3.06],p=0.031)、心肌梗死(OR 2.07 [95%CI 1.19 至 3.61],p=0.010)和永久性起搏器(OR:1.93 [95%CI 1.25 至 3.00],p=0.003)与≥5%的 LVEF 改善不足独立相关。在中位数为 3.8 年(四分位距 2.6 至 5.2)的随访期间,有 176 名患者死亡(31%)。与 LVEF 改善<5%的患者相比,LVEF 改善≥5%的患者具有相似的结局(对数秩 p=0.89)。
总之,基线 LVEF <40%的严重 AS 患者在 TAVI 后 1 年随访时 LVEF 改善最大。冠状动脉疾病、心肌梗死和永久性起搏器与 LVEF 改善不足相关。然而,12 个月时的 LVEF 改善与长期结局无关。