• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在防潮不足的环境中,传统玻璃离子水门汀的实用性。

Usefulness of conventional glass ionomer cements in an environment of insufficient moisture exclusion.

机构信息

Clinics of Dentistry for Disabled, Tohoku University Hospital, Tohoku University.

Division of Dental Biomaterials, Tohoku University Graduate School of Dentistry.

出版信息

J Oral Sci. 2022 Jul 1;64(3):242-246. doi: 10.2334/josnusd.22-0012. Epub 2022 Jun 10.

DOI:10.2334/josnusd.22-0012
PMID:35691887
Abstract

PURPOSE

Moisture exclusion while treating dental caries can be challenging, and the glass ionomer cements (GICs) used for these procedures are susceptible to water. Few studies have examined the effects of the powder/liquid ratio (PLR) on the physical properties of GICs exposed to water. In this study, the hardness and thickness of the water-susceptible surface layer of three GICs were evaluated.

METHODS

Three conventional GICs were mixed in increasing PLRs, and hardness over time was measured under conditions of no water exposure, distilled water exposure, and saliva exposure. Furthermore, the thickness of the water-susceptible layer for each GIC was determined.

RESULTS

A water-susceptible layer of approximately 250 μm was evident for all GICs, and the thickness decreased with increasing PLR. GIC hardness increased with increasing PLR in conditions without water for all GIC types. Furthermore, the removal of the water-susceptible layer restored the physical properties of each GIC.

CONCLUSION

Overall, the results indicate that conventional GIC restoration with the removal of the water-susceptible surface layer is a feasible strategy for treating dental caries in individuals for whom exclusion of moisture can be difficult.

摘要

目的

在治疗龋齿时,防止水分进入是一项挑战,而用于这些治疗的玻璃离子水门汀(GIC)容易受到水分的影响。很少有研究探讨过粉液比(PLR)对暴露于水分的 GIC 物理性能的影响。本研究评估了三种 GIC 暴露于水分时的表面易感性硬度和厚度。

方法

将三种传统的 GIC 按比例混合,并在不暴露于水、蒸馏水和唾液的情况下,随时间测量硬度。此外,还确定了每种 GIC 的易感性水层的厚度。

结果

所有 GIC 都有大约 250μm 的易感性水层,厚度随 PLR 的增加而减少。在所有 GIC 类型中,在没有水的情况下,PLR 越高,GIC 硬度越高。此外,去除易感性水层可恢复每种 GIC 的物理性能。

结论

总的来说,结果表明,对于那些难以防止水分进入的患者,通过去除易感性表面层来进行传统 GIC 修复是一种可行的治疗龋齿的策略。

相似文献

1
Usefulness of conventional glass ionomer cements in an environment of insufficient moisture exclusion.在防潮不足的环境中,传统玻璃离子水门汀的实用性。
J Oral Sci. 2022 Jul 1;64(3):242-246. doi: 10.2334/josnusd.22-0012. Epub 2022 Jun 10.
2
Effect of G-Coat Plus on the mechanical properties of glass-ionomer cements.G-Coat Plus 对玻璃离子水门汀力学性能的影响。
Aust Dent J. 2013 Dec;58(4):448-53. doi: 10.1111/adj.12122.
3
An in vitro study on the maturation of conventional glass ionomer cements and their interface to dentin.体外研究传统玻璃离子水门汀的成熟及其与牙本质的界面。
Acta Biomater. 2013 Dec;9(12):9529-37. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.08.010. Epub 2013 Aug 13.
4
Effect of one-year water storage on the surface microhardness of resin-modified versus conventional glass-ionomer cements.一年水储存对树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀与传统玻璃离子水门汀表面显微硬度的影响。
Dent Mater. 2003 Jun;19(4):286-90. doi: 10.1016/s0109-5641(02)00042-8.
5
Mechanical properties and microstructures of glass-ionomer cements.玻璃离子水门汀的力学性能和微观结构。
Dent Mater. 2000 Mar;16(2):129-38. doi: 10.1016/s0109-5641(99)00093-7.
6
Effect of aging on mechanical and antibacterial properties of fluorinated graphene reinforced glass ionomer: In vitro study.氟石墨烯增强玻璃离子体老化对机械性能和抗菌性能的影响:体外研究。
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2023 Jun;142:105803. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2023.105803. Epub 2023 Apr 5.
7
A novel glass ionomer cement with silver zeolite for restorative dentistry.一种新型的玻璃离子水门汀,含银沸石,用于修复牙科。
J Dent. 2023 Jun;133:104524. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104524. Epub 2023 Apr 18.
8
Properties of a proline-containing glass ionomer dental cement.一种含有脯氨酸的玻璃离子体牙科水门汀的性能。
J Prosthet Dent. 2013 Nov;110(5):408-13. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.04.009. Epub 2013 Aug 30.
9
Comparative evaluation of the physical properties of a reinforced glass ionomer dental restorative material.增强型玻璃离子体齿科修复材料物理性能的比较评估。
J Prosthet Dent. 2019 Aug;122(2):154-159. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.03.012. Epub 2019 Jul 17.
10
Mineral loss on adjacent enamel glass ionomer cements restorations after cariogenic and erosive challenges.龋蚀和酸蚀挑战后邻面釉质玻璃离子水门汀修复体的矿物质丢失。
Arch Oral Biol. 2011 Oct;56(10):1014-9. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2011.03.005. Epub 2011 Apr 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Ultrasound Microscopy-Based Identification of Enamel and Restorative Materials: An Ex Vivo Acoustic Impedance Study.基于超声显微镜的牙釉质与修复材料识别:一项离体声阻抗研究
Int Dent J. 2025 Jun 30;75(5):100880. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2025.100880.
2
Mechanical Properties and Ion Release from Fibre-Reinforced Glass Ionomer Cement.纤维增强玻璃离子水门汀的力学性能与离子释放
Polymers (Basel). 2024 Feb 23;16(5):607. doi: 10.3390/polym16050607.
3
Do bioactive materials show greater retention rates in restoring permanent teeth than non-bioactive materials? A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
生物活性材料在永久性牙齿修复中的保留率是否高于非生物活性材料?一项随机对照试验的系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Clin Oral Investig. 2023 Dec 28;28(1):44. doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-05414-3.