Ormiston Heather E, Nygaard Malena A, Apgar Sophia
Department of Counseling and Educational Psychology, Indiana University Bloomington, 201 N. Rose Ave., Bloomington, IN 47405 USA.
School Ment Health. 2022;14(4):802-817. doi: 10.1007/s12310-022-09525-2. Epub 2022 Jun 4.
When teachers care for children with trauma histories, they are at risk of developing compassion fatigue (CF), or a reduced empathic capacity (Hupe and Stevenson in J Child Custody Res Issues Pract 16(4):364-386, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1080/15379418.2019.1663334). They may also develop secondary traumatic stress (STS), a secondary condition resulting from a person learning about details of a traumatic event experienced by someone in their care (Essary et al. in Kappa Delta Pi Record 56(3):116-121, 2020). While CF and STS have been studied widely in healthcare and mental health professionals (Baird and Kracen in Couns Psychol Q 19(2):181-188, 2006; Caringi et al. in Adv Sch Ment Health Promot 8(4):244-256, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1080/1754730X.2015.1080123; Cieslak et al. in Psychol Serv 11(1):75-86, 2014), STS and CF have been understudied in the teaching profession (Caringi et al., 2015; Christian-Brandt et al. in Child Abuse Neglect 110(3):104437, 2020; Hupe & Stevenson, 2019). As such, we sought to complete a systematic review of the literature to answer two questions: (1) To what extent are CF and STS being studied in teachers?; and (2) How have CF and STS been studied in teachers? Qualitative data analysis led to the emergence of four themes across all included studies: (1) conceptualization of CF and STS; (2) teachers are at risk of developing CF and STS; (3) varying approaches can mitigate the risk of CF and STS in teachers; and (4) there is limited research on CF and STS in teachers. Limitations and directions for future research and practice are described.
当教师照顾有创伤史的儿童时,他们有产生同情疲劳(CF)或共情能力下降的风险(休普和史蒂文森,《儿童监护权研究问题与实践》,2019年,第16卷第4期,第364 - 386页。https://doi.org/10.1080/15379418.2019.1663334)。他们也可能会产生继发性创伤应激(STS),这是一种由于个人了解到其照顾对象所经历的创伤事件细节而导致的继发性状况(埃萨里等人,《卡帕德尔塔派记录》,2020年,第56卷第3期,第116 - 121页)。虽然CF和STS在医疗保健和心理健康专业人员中已得到广泛研究(贝尔德和克拉森,《咨询心理学季刊》,2006年,第19卷第2期,第181 - 188页;卡里尼等人,《促进学校心理健康》,2015年,第8卷第4期,第244 - 256页。https://doi.org/10.1080/1754730X.2015.1080123;西斯拉等人,《心理服务》,2014年,第11卷第1期,第75 - 86页),但STS和CF在教师职业中却研究不足(卡里尼等人,2015年;克里斯蒂安 - 布兰特等人,《虐待儿童与忽视》,2020年,第110卷第3期,第104437页;休普和史蒂文森,2019年)。因此,我们试图完成一项文献系统综述,以回答两个问题:(1)在教师中对CF和STS的研究程度如何?;(2)在教师中如何研究CF和STS?定性数据分析导致在所有纳入研究中出现了四个主题:(1)CF和STS的概念化;(2)教师有产生CF和STS的风险;(3)不同方法可以降低教师产生CF和STS的风险;(4)对教师中CF和STS的研究有限。文中描述了局限性以及未来研究和实践的方向。