Graduate Program in Ecology of Continental Aquatic Environments (PEA), Department of Biology (DBI), Center of Biological Sciences (CCB), State University of Maringá (UEM), Maringá, Brazil.
Graduate Program in Aquaculture and Sustainable Development, Department of Zootechnics, Federal University of Paraná, Palotina, Brazil.
Environ Manage. 2022 Aug;70(2):307-318. doi: 10.1007/s00267-022-01671-2. Epub 2022 Jun 13.
The objectives of this study were to compare four risk assessment protocols for non-native species in neotropical regions and to assess the potential application of these tools for the management of invasive species and conservation of the ichthyofauna in Brazil. The protocols Fish Invasiveness Screening Kit (FISK), Aquatic Species Invasiveness Screening Kit (AS-ISK), European Non-Native Species in Aquaculture Risk Assessment Scheme (ENSARS) and Fish Invasiveness Screening Test (FIST) were applied for the species Oreochromis niloticus, Coptodon rendalli, Poecilia reticulata and Apteronotus aff. albifrons, whose sources of introduction are aquaculture and fishkeeping. The species were classified as low, medium or high risk of invasion. The scores of the species O. niloticus, C. rendalli and P. reticulata classified them as high risk of invasion in all protocols, whereas A. aff. albifrons had medium risk in the protocols FISK and AS-ISK and low risk in the FIST. Although the results were similar for species whose impacts are widely described, less studied species may have their classification compromised by the lack of evidences in the literature. Despite the difficulties for practical application, the use of these tools may be encouraged, considering the potential threats of other invasive species emerging in Brazil. The comparison between the methods showed that the use of AS-ISK, combined with ENSARS in cases of introductions by aquaculture, provides important answers about ecological impacts on natural environments and about the stages of the aquaculture production chain that should be better inspected.
本研究的目的是比较四种用于新热带地区非本地物种的风险评估方案,并评估这些工具在入侵物种管理和保护巴西鱼类区系方面的潜在应用。该方案应用于鱼类入侵筛查工具(FISK)、水生物种入侵筛查工具(AS-ISK)、欧洲水产养殖外来物种风险评估方案(ENSARS)和鱼类入侵筛查测试(FIST),用于评估 O. niloticus、C. rendalli、P. reticulata 和 Apteronotus aff. albifrons 这四个物种。这些物种的引入来源是水产养殖和鱼类养殖。根据风险评估方案,这四个物种被归类为低、中或高入侵风险。在所有的风险评估方案中,O. niloticus、C. rendalli 和 P. reticulata 这三个物种的得分都被归类为高入侵风险,而 A. aff. albifrons 在 FISK 和 AS-ISK 方案中被归类为中风险,在 FIST 方案中则被归类为低风险。尽管对于影响广泛描述的物种,结果相似,但由于文献中缺乏证据,研究较少的物种的分类可能会受到影响。尽管在实际应用中存在困难,但考虑到巴西新出现的其他入侵物种的潜在威胁,仍鼓励使用这些工具。方法之间的比较表明,使用 AS-ISK 并结合 ENSARS 用于水产养殖引入的情况,可以提供关于对自然环境的生态影响以及水产养殖生产链中应更好检查的阶段的重要答案。