Department of Cardiology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Miyagi, Japan.
Thromb Haemost. 2022 Sep;122(9):1584-1593. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1744543. Epub 2022 Jun 13.
Rivaroxaban monotherapy was noninferior to combination therapy (rivaroxaban plus antiplatelet therapy) in efficacy but superior in safety in the Atrial Fibrillation and Ischemic Events with Rivaroxaban in Patients with Stable Coronary Artery Disease (AFIRE) trial. Among 2,215 patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and stable coronary artery disease (CAD), 1,378 had baseline creatinine clearance (CrCl) ≥50 mL/min and received 10 (underdose) or 15 mg/d (standard-dose) rivaroxaban. We aimed to assess the effects of rivaroxaban underdose on clinical outcomes.
We assessed efficacy endpoint (a composite of stroke, systemic embolism, myocardial infarction, unstable angina requiring revascularization, and death from any cause) and major bleeding in the subgroup of patients with preserved renal function in the AFIRE trial.
Age ≥75 years, female sex, lower CrCl, heart failure, and percutaneous coronary intervention history were associated with the underdose prescription. The underdose group had a similar incidence of the efficacy endpoint (3.62 vs. 3.51% per patient-year; = 0.871) and significantly lower incidence of major bleeding (0.82 vs. 2.17% per patient-year; = 0.022) than the standard-dose group. In patients receiving monotherapy, the incidences of efficacy endpoint and major bleeding were similar between the groups, whereas in those receiving combination therapy, the incidence of major bleeding was significantly lower in the underdose group than that in the standard-dose group.
In patients with AF, stable CAD, and preserved renal function, rivaroxaban underdose was associated with similar rates of thrombotic events but a lower incidence of hemorrhagic events than the standard dose.
AFIRE UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (https://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/), number UMIN000016612, and ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02642419.
在房颤和缺血事件与利伐沙班在稳定型冠状动脉疾病患者(AFIRE)试验中,利伐沙班单药治疗在疗效上不劣于联合治疗(利伐沙班加抗血小板治疗),但在安全性方面更优。在 2215 名患有房颤(AF)和稳定型冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的患者中,有 1378 名患者的基线肌酐清除率(CrCl)≥50ml/min,接受 10 (剂量不足)或 15mg/d(标准剂量)利伐沙班。我们旨在评估利伐沙班剂量不足对临床结局的影响。
我们评估了 AFIRE 试验中肾功能正常亚组的疗效终点(中风、全身性栓塞、心肌梗死、不稳定型心绞痛需要血运重建和任何原因导致的死亡的复合)和大出血。
年龄≥75 岁、女性、较低的 CrCl、心力衰竭和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗史与处方剂量不足有关。剂量不足组的疗效终点发生率相似(3.62 与 3.51%/患者年;=0.871),大出血发生率显著低于标准剂量组(0.82 与 2.17%/患者年;=0.022)。在接受单药治疗的患者中,两组的疗效终点和大出血发生率相似,而在接受联合治疗的患者中,剂量不足组的大出血发生率明显低于标准剂量组。
在患有 AF、稳定型 CAD 和保留肾功能的患者中,利伐沙班剂量不足与血栓形成事件的发生率相似,但出血事件的发生率低于标准剂量。
AFIRE UMIN 临床试验注册处(https://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/),注册号 UMIN000016612,和 ClinicalTrials.gov,注册号 NCT02642419。