Department of Medical Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
BMJ Open. 2022 Jun 13;12(6):e057098. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057098.
This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of different platinum adjuvant chemotherapy regimens for early-stage resected non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Systematic review with network meta-analysis of randomised trials.
PubMed, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science and Scopus Google Scholar were searched through 12 March 2021.
Eligible randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the postoperative platinum chemotherapy regimen with the observation-controlled group or comparing two platinum chemotherapy regimens head-to-head were included.
The primary outcome was the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy regimens including relapse-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), 2-year, 3-year, 5-year RFS rate and OS rate. The secondary outcome was the rate of grade 3-4 toxicity assessments. Cochrane Handbook (V.5) was used for the risk of bias assessment. Analyses were performed using R software V.4.3.1.
20 RCTs with a sample size of 5483 were enrolled in meta-analysis. The chemotherapy group had a significant RFS and OS advantage compared with the observation group (HR 0.67; 95% CI 0.56 to 0.81, p<0.0001; HR 0.80; 95% CI, 0.73 to 0.88, p<0.0001, respectively). Compared with the observation arm, only the 'cisplatin_vinorelbine' regimen had a significant RFS and OS advantage (HR 0.63; 95% CI 0.43 to 0.87; HR 0.74; 95% CI 0.63 to 0.87, respectively) while the remaining chemotherapy regimens had no significant difference of efficacy compared with the observation group. In terms of the safety of adjuvant chemotherapy, the incidence of haematological toxicities and nausea/vomiting was not significantly higher in the 'cisplatin_vinorelbine' arm than in other chemotherapy group.
This study summarised the adjuvant cytotoxicity chemotherapy regimens for patients with early-stage resected NSCLC. Our analysis may provide some guiding significance for the clinicians when determining the optimal chemotherapy regimen.
本研究旨在比较不同铂类辅助化疗方案治疗早期可切除非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的疗效和安全性。
系统评价和网络荟萃分析随机试验。
通过 2021 年 3 月 12 日检索 PubMed、EMBASE、The Cochrane Library、Web of Science 和 Scopus Google Scholar 等数据库。
纳入比较术后铂类化疗方案与观察组或直接比较两种铂类化疗方案的随机对照试验(RCT)。
主要结局是辅助化疗方案的疗效,包括无复发生存(RFS)、总生存(OS)、2 年、3 年、5 年 RFS 率和 OS 率。次要结局是 3-4 级毒性发生率。采用 Cochrane 手册(V.5)评估偏倚风险。采用 R 软件 V.4.3.1 进行分析。
纳入 20 项 RCT 共 5483 例患者。与观察组相比,化疗组的 RFS 和 OS 均有显著优势(HR 0.67;95%CI 0.56 至 0.81,p<0.0001;HR 0.80;95%CI,0.73 至 0.88,p<0.0001)。与观察组相比,只有“顺铂_长春瑞滨”方案在 RFS 和 OS 方面有显著优势(HR 0.63;95%CI 0.43 至 0.87;HR 0.74;95%CI 0.63 至 0.87),而其他化疗方案与观察组相比无显著疗效差异。在辅助化疗的安全性方面,“顺铂_长春瑞滨”组的血液学毒性和恶心/呕吐发生率并不明显高于其他化疗组。
本研究总结了早期可切除 NSCLC 患者的辅助细胞毒性化疗方案。我们的分析可能为临床医生确定最佳化疗方案提供一些指导意义。