Department of General Practice, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Department of Medicine, Monash Health, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
BMJ Open. 2022 Jun 13;12(6):e061671. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061671.
We sought to understand the factors that influence a general practitioner's (GP's) experience of screening for primary aldosteronism (PA) in hypertensive patients.
A qualitative study, framed by phenomenology, using semistructured interviews that were audiorecorded, transcribed verbatim, entered into NVivo V.12.0 for coding and analysed for emerging themes.
Melbourne, Australia.
Eligible GPs had received education on PA as part of a previous study. We recruited a purposive sample of 16 GPs (6 females, 10 males) who varied in practice location, clinical experience and the number of patients screened for PA.
Although GPs had been educated about PA, they found it challenging to explain the condition to patients and were uncertain about how to screen patients who were already taking antihypertensive medications. Most viewed the screening process to be practical, inexpensive and, by and large, acceptable to their patients. However, they found it inconvenient to alter antihypertensive medications before screening to allow for easier interpretation of the aldosterone-renin ratio. They were also less enthused about screening patients whom they thought fitted a clinical picture of essential hypertension. Knowledge of the screening process, cost and convenience of performing the aldosterone-renin ratio, conceptualisation of risk related to PA, and a desire to improve clinical care were influencing factors that modified the GPs' screening experience.
Our findings suggest that knowledge gaps, practical limitations of the aldosterone-renin ratio, and errors in diagnostic reasoning were challenges of routine PA screening. Most of these practical barriers could be addressed by relatively simple educational and practice modifications to increase PA screening rates and optimise detection for the most common cause of secondary hypertension in primary care.
我们旨在了解影响全科医生(GP)在高血压患者中筛查原发性醛固酮增多症(PA)体验的因素。
一项定性研究,受现象学框架的限制,采用半结构化访谈,对访谈进行录音、逐字转录、输入 NVivo V.12.0 进行编码,并对新出现的主题进行分析。
澳大利亚墨尔本。
符合条件的全科医生之前参加过有关 PA 的教育项目。我们按照目的抽样法招募了 16 名全科医生(6 名女性,10 名男性),他们的实践地点、临床经验和筛查 PA 的患者人数各不相同。
尽管全科医生已经接受了关于 PA 的教育,但他们发现向患者解释这种疾病具有挑战性,并且对如何筛查已经服用抗高血压药物的患者感到不确定。大多数人认为筛查过程实用、经济实惠,并且在很大程度上可以被患者接受。然而,他们发现改变降压药物在筛查前以方便解释醛固酮-肾素比值不太方便。他们对那些他们认为符合原发性高血压临床特征的患者进行筛查的积极性也不高。对筛查过程的了解、进行醛固酮-肾素比值检测的成本和便利性、对与 PA 相关的风险的概念化,以及改善临床护理的愿望是影响全科医生筛查体验的因素。
我们的研究结果表明,知识差距、醛固酮-肾素比值的实际限制、以及诊断推理中的错误是常规 PA 筛查的挑战。通过相对简单的教育和实践修改,可以解决这些实际障碍中的大多数,以提高 PA 筛查率并优化初级保健中最常见的继发性高血压的检测。