Suppr超能文献

旋前-外旋型踝关节损伤中是否应稳定下胫腓联合?一项回顾性队列比较研究。

Should Diastatic Syndesmosis be Stabilized in Advanced Pronation-External Rotation Ankle Injuries? A Retrospective Cohort Comparison.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan, China.

出版信息

Orthop Surg. 2022 Jul;14(7):1447-1456. doi: 10.1111/os.13331. Epub 2022 Jun 13.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

With or without screw stabilization for diastatic syndesmosis in advanced pronation-external rotation (PE) ankle injuries has not yet been well-determined. Both techniques were retrospectively compared to investigate the superiority of either of the two.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was carried out. From January 1, 2008, to December 31, 2017, 81 consecutive adult patients (average, 42 years; range, 18-78 years; 44 men and 37 women) with advanced PE ankle injuries (stage 3 or 4 PE type) were treated. After malleolar fractures were internally stabilized with screws and plates, the syndesmotic stability was rechecked by external rotation and hook tests. The necessity of cortical screw insertion to stabilize diastatic syndesmosis was decided by the individual orthopaedic surgeon. Postoperatively, a short leg splint was used for 6 weeks. The syndesmotic screw was removed based on the surgeon's policy. The removal of internal fixation for malleolar fractures was required after 1 year. The outcomes of both approaches were compared clinically, and ankle function was compared using the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score. For statistical comparison, the chi-square test was used for categorical data and the Mann-Whitney U test was used for numerical data.

RESULTS

Seventy-one patients (average, 40 years; range, 18-78 years; 40 men and 31 women) were followed for at least 1 year (87.7%; average, 2 years; range, 1-11 years). Group 1 (with syndesmotic stabilization) had 22 patients and Group 2 (without syndesmotic stabilization), 49 patients. The union rate in Group 1 patients was 100% (22/22), and in Group 2 patients, 91.8% (45/49; p = 0.17). One deep wound infection occurred in Group 1 patients and two in Group 2 patients. Syndesmosis re-diastasis occurred in 13.6% (3/22) of Group 1 patients and 30.6% (15/49) of Group 2 patients (p = 0.13). One syndesmotic screw broke at 6 months. Satisfactory ankle function according to the AOFAS score was noted in 86.4% (19/22) of Group 1 patients and 65.3% (32/49) of Group 2 patients (p = 0.07).

CONCLUSION

Insertion of syndesmotic screws to promote ligament healing after internal fixation of malleolar fractures in advanced PE ankle injuries may be reasonable.

摘要

目的

在先进的旋前-外旋(PE)踝关节损伤中,使用或不使用螺钉稳定距腓联合的效果尚未得到很好的确定。本研究回顾性比较了这两种技术,以探讨哪种技术更具优势。

方法

本研究为回顾性队列研究。自 2008 年 1 月 1 日至 2017 年 12 月 31 日,81 例连续的成人(平均年龄 42 岁;范围 18-78 岁;44 名男性,37 名女性)接受了先进的 PE 踝关节损伤(PE 型 3 或 4 期)的治疗。在使用螺钉和钢板对内踝骨折进行固定后,通过外旋和钩试验再次检查距腓联合的稳定性。是否需要皮质螺钉插入以稳定距腓联合由骨科医生决定。术后使用短腿夹板固定 6 周。根据医生的方案取出距腓联合螺钉。1 年后需要取出内固定物。两种方法的临床结果进行了比较,采用美国矫形足踝协会(AOFAS)评分比较踝关节功能。对于统计学比较,分类数据采用卡方检验,数值数据采用 Mann-Whitney U 检验。

结果

71 例患者(平均年龄 40 岁;范围 18-78 岁;40 名男性,31 名女性)至少随访 1 年(87.7%;平均随访 2 年;范围 1-11 年)。第 1 组(有距腓联合稳定)有 22 例患者,第 2 组(无距腓联合稳定)有 49 例患者。第 1 组患者的愈合率为 100%(22/22),第 2 组患者的愈合率为 91.8%(45/49;p=0.17)。第 1 组有 1 例深部伤口感染,第 2 组有 2 例深部伤口感染。第 1 组有 13.6%(3/22)的患者发生距腓联合再分离,第 2 组有 30.6%(15/49)的患者发生距腓联合再分离(p=0.13)。第 1 组有 1 枚距腓联合螺钉在 6 个月时断裂。第 1 组有 86.4%(19/22)的患者和第 2 组有 65.3%(32/49)的患者的踝关节功能根据 AOFAS 评分评定为满意(p=0.07)。

结论

在先进的 PE 踝关节损伤中,在固定内踝骨折后插入距腓联合螺钉以促进韧带愈合可能是合理的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d92d/9251295/19facf5e8bf1/OS-14-1447-g004.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验