Department of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, Delhi.
Department of Pulmonary Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India.
J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol. 2023 Jul 1;30(3):232-237. doi: 10.1097/LBR.0000000000000869.
Ensuring adequate patient comfort is crucial during bronchoscopy. Although lidocaine spray is recommended for topical pharyngeal anesthesia, the optimum dose of sprays is unclear. We compared 5 versus 10 sprays of 10% lidocaine for topical anesthesia during bronchoscopy.
In this investigator-initiated, prospective, multicenter, randomized clinical trial, subjects were randomized to receive 5 (group A) or 10 sprays (group B) of 10% lidocaine. The primary objective was to compare the operator-rated overall procedure satisfaction between the groups.
Two hundred eighty-four subjects were randomized (143 group A and 141 group B). The operator-rated overall procedure satisfaction, VAS [mean (SD)] was similar between the groups [group A, 74.1 (19.9) and group B, 74.3 (18.5), P =0.93]. The VAS scores of patient-rated cough [group A, 32.5 (22.9) and group B, 32.3 (22.2), P =0.93], and operator-rated cough [group A, 29.8 (22.3) and group B, 26.9 (21.5), P =0.26] were also similar. The time to reach vocal cords, overall procedure duration, mean doses of sedatives, the proportion of subjects willing to return for a repeat procedure (if required), and complications were not significantly different. Subjects in group A received significantly less cumulative lidocaine (mg) [group A, 293.9 (11.6) and group B, 343.5 (10.6), P <0.001].
During bronchoscopy, topical anesthesia with 5 sprays of 10% lidocaine is preferred as it is associated with a similar operator-rated overall procedure satisfaction at a lower cumulative lidocaine dose compared with 10 sprays.
在支气管镜检查过程中,确保患者充分舒适至关重要。虽然推荐使用利多卡因喷雾进行局部咽部麻醉,但喷雾的最佳剂量尚不清楚。我们比较了支气管镜检查中使用 5 喷和 10 喷 10%利多卡因进行局部麻醉的效果。
在这项由研究者发起的、前瞻性的、多中心、随机临床试验中,受试者被随机分为接受 5 喷(A 组)或 10 喷(B 组)10%利多卡因。主要目的是比较两组之间操作者评估的整体手术满意度。
共随机分配了 284 名受试者(A 组 143 名,B 组 141 名)。两组之间操作者评估的整体手术满意度(VAS)相似[组 A,74.1(19.9);组 B,74.3(18.5),P=0.93]。患者评估的咳嗽(组 A,32.5(22.9);组 B,32.3(22.2),P=0.93)和操作者评估的咳嗽(组 A,29.8(22.3);组 B,26.9(21.5),P=0.26)的 VAS 评分也相似。到达声带的时间、整个手术过程的持续时间、镇静剂的平均剂量、愿意再次接受重复手术(如果需要)的受试者比例以及并发症没有显著差异。A 组接受的累积利多卡因(mg)明显较少[组 A,293.9(11.6);组 B,343.5(10.6),P<0.001]。
与 10 喷相比,支气管镜检查时使用 5 喷 10%利多卡因进行局部麻醉可获得相似的操作者评估的整体手术满意度,且累积利多卡因剂量较低。