Suppr超能文献

5 喷 vs. 10 喷 10% 利多卡因咽部喷雾用于纤维支气管镜检查的表面麻醉:一项多中心随机对照试验。

Five Versus 10 Pharyngeal Sprays of 10% Lignocaine for Topical Anesthesia During Flexible Bronchoscopy: A Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial.

机构信息

Department of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, Delhi.

Department of Pulmonary Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India.

出版信息

J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol. 2023 Jul 1;30(3):232-237. doi: 10.1097/LBR.0000000000000869.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Ensuring adequate patient comfort is crucial during bronchoscopy. Although lidocaine spray is recommended for topical pharyngeal anesthesia, the optimum dose of sprays is unclear. We compared 5 versus 10 sprays of 10% lidocaine for topical anesthesia during bronchoscopy.

METHODS

In this investigator-initiated, prospective, multicenter, randomized clinical trial, subjects were randomized to receive 5 (group A) or 10 sprays (group B) of 10% lidocaine. The primary objective was to compare the operator-rated overall procedure satisfaction between the groups.

RESULTS

Two hundred eighty-four subjects were randomized (143 group A and 141 group B). The operator-rated overall procedure satisfaction, VAS [mean (SD)] was similar between the groups [group A, 74.1 (19.9) and group B, 74.3 (18.5), P =0.93]. The VAS scores of patient-rated cough [group A, 32.5 (22.9) and group B, 32.3 (22.2), P =0.93], and operator-rated cough [group A, 29.8 (22.3) and group B, 26.9 (21.5), P =0.26] were also similar. The time to reach vocal cords, overall procedure duration, mean doses of sedatives, the proportion of subjects willing to return for a repeat procedure (if required), and complications were not significantly different. Subjects in group A received significantly less cumulative lidocaine (mg) [group A, 293.9 (11.6) and group B, 343.5 (10.6), P <0.001].

CONCLUSION

During bronchoscopy, topical anesthesia with 5 sprays of 10% lidocaine is preferred as it is associated with a similar operator-rated overall procedure satisfaction at a lower cumulative lidocaine dose compared with 10 sprays.

摘要

背景

在支气管镜检查过程中,确保患者充分舒适至关重要。虽然推荐使用利多卡因喷雾进行局部咽部麻醉,但喷雾的最佳剂量尚不清楚。我们比较了支气管镜检查中使用 5 喷和 10 喷 10%利多卡因进行局部麻醉的效果。

方法

在这项由研究者发起的、前瞻性的、多中心、随机临床试验中,受试者被随机分为接受 5 喷(A 组)或 10 喷(B 组)10%利多卡因。主要目的是比较两组之间操作者评估的整体手术满意度。

结果

共随机分配了 284 名受试者(A 组 143 名,B 组 141 名)。两组之间操作者评估的整体手术满意度(VAS)相似[组 A,74.1(19.9);组 B,74.3(18.5),P=0.93]。患者评估的咳嗽(组 A,32.5(22.9);组 B,32.3(22.2),P=0.93)和操作者评估的咳嗽(组 A,29.8(22.3);组 B,26.9(21.5),P=0.26)的 VAS 评分也相似。到达声带的时间、整个手术过程的持续时间、镇静剂的平均剂量、愿意再次接受重复手术(如果需要)的受试者比例以及并发症没有显著差异。A 组接受的累积利多卡因(mg)明显较少[组 A,293.9(11.6);组 B,343.5(10.6),P<0.001]。

结论

与 10 喷相比,支气管镜检查时使用 5 喷 10%利多卡因进行局部麻醉可获得相似的操作者评估的整体手术满意度,且累积利多卡因剂量较低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验