Suppr超能文献

经皮骨锚式听力植入:在韩国临床上是否有用?

Percutaneous Bone-Anchored Hearing Implant: Is It Clinically Useful in Korean?

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Hearing Research Laboratory, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

J Korean Med Sci. 2022 Jun 13;37(23):e182. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2022.37.e182.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study is to investigate the clinical effectiveness of Ponto in Korea, a recently released percutaneous bone-anchored hearing implant.

METHODS

16 patients with single-sided deafness (SSD) and mixed or conductive hearing loss who underwent Ponto implantation from December 2018 to September 2020 were enrolled in the study. Puretone audiometry, the Korean version of the Hearing in Noise Test (K-HINT), sound localization test (SLT), and Pupillometry were performed pre- and three months post-operation. Standardized questionnaires, the Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly (HHIE) and Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ), were administered.

RESULTS

The mean age of subjects was 55.5 (range, 48-67) years. Four males and 12 females participated in the study. The mean puretone average was 73.17 dB hearing level (HL) before surgery and significantly improved to 36.72 dB HL three months after surgery. The mean word recognition score improved from 26.0% to 90.75% after implantation. In the case of K-HINT, there was a significant difference in summation (Z = -2.250, = 0.024) and head shadow effects (Z = -3.103, = 0.002). There was no significant difference in root mean square error degree (RMSE) and hemifield identification scores for SLT testing. Pupillometry was performed to measure listening effort and the results revealed that the degree of pupillary dilatation decreased under the condition of quiet, 0 dB signal to noise ratio (SNR) and 3 dB SNR. The total score for HHIE decreased significantly ( = -3.130, = 0.002) while the SSQ score increased significantly ( = -2.216, = 0.027).

CONCLUSIONS

The Ponto bone-anchored hearing system showed significant clinical benefit in Korean patients with conductive and mixed hearing loss and SSD.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在探讨韩国最新推出的经皮骨锚式听力植入体 Ponto 的临床疗效。

方法

本研究纳入了 2018 年 12 月至 2020 年 9 月期间接受 Ponto 植入术的 16 例单侧聋(SSD)和混合性或传导性听力损失患者。术前和术后 3 个月分别进行纯音测听、韩国版噪声下言语测听(K-HINT)、声源定位测试(SLT)和瞳孔测量。同时采用老年人听力障碍问卷(HHIE)和言语、空间和听觉质量量表(SSQ)进行标准化问卷调查。

结果

受试者的平均年龄为 55.5 岁(范围 48-67 岁),男性 4 例,女性 12 例。术前平均纯音平均听阈为 73.17dB 听力级(HL),术后 3 个月显著改善至 36.72dB HL。植入术后言语识别率从 26.0%提高至 90.75%。在 K-HINT 方面,和值(Z=-2.250, =0.024)和头部阴影效应(Z=-3.103, =0.002)有显著差异。SLT 测试的均方根误差(RMSE)和半视野识别评分无显著差异。进行瞳孔测量以评估听力努力程度,结果表明在安静、0dB 信噪比(SNR)和 3dB SNR 条件下,瞳孔扩张程度减小。HHIE 总分显著降低( =-3.130, =0.002),SSQ 评分显著升高( =-2.216, =0.027)。

结论

Ponto 骨锚式听力系统在韩国传导性和混合性听力损失及 SSD 患者中具有显著的临床获益。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15e7/9194490/4c2354b5470b/jkms-37-e182-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Percutaneous Bone-Anchored Hearing Implant: Is It Clinically Useful in Korean?
J Korean Med Sci. 2022 Jun 13;37(23):e182. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2022.37.e182.
3
A New Active Osseointegrated Implant System in Patients with Single-Sided Deafness.
Audiol Neurootol. 2022;27(1):83-92. doi: 10.1159/000515489. Epub 2021 Apr 26.
5
Safety and effectiveness of the Bonebridge transcutaneous active direct-drive bone-conduction hearing implant at 1-year device use.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 Apr;274(4):1835-1851. doi: 10.1007/s00405-016-4228-6. Epub 2016 Jul 30.
6
Outcomes after Application of Active Bone Conducting Implants.
Audiol Neurootol. 2019;24(4):197-205. doi: 10.1159/000502052. Epub 2019 Sep 9.
8
Audiologic and surgical outcomes of a novel, nonpercutaneous, bone conducting hearing implant.
Otol Neurotol. 2013 Jul;34(5):922-6. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31827e60bd.
10
Improvement of speech perception in quiet and in noise without decreasing localization abilities with the bone conduction device Bonebridge.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 May;274(5):2107-2115. doi: 10.1007/s00405-016-4434-2. Epub 2016 Dec 28.

引用本文的文献

2
[Intervention effects of bone conduction hearing aids in patients with single-sided deafness and asymmetric hearing loss].
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2023 Nov;37(11):927-933. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2023.11.014.

本文引用的文献

1
Audiological benefits and performance improvements of Baha® attract implantation in patients with unilateral hearing loss.
Cochlear Implants Int. 2021 Sep;22(5):270-282. doi: 10.1080/14670100.2021.1903713. Epub 2021 Mar 22.
2
National representative analysis of unilateral hearing loss and hearing aid usage in South Korea.
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 23;15(4):e0232112. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232112. eCollection 2020.
3
Efficacy of non-invasive treatment options for single-sided deafness: A prospective study of 20 patients.
Clin Otolaryngol. 2020 May;45(3):409-413. doi: 10.1111/coa.13504. Epub 2020 Feb 5.
5
Osseointegrated Auditory Devices: Bone-Anchored Hearing Aid and PONTO.
Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2019 Apr;52(2):243-251. doi: 10.1016/j.otc.2018.11.005. Epub 2019 Jan 5.
6
Baha Attract: Our Experience.
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Dec;69(4):544-548. doi: 10.1007/s12070-017-1192-4. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
7
A comparison study of complications and initial follow-up costs of transcutaneous and percutaneous bone conduction devices.
J Laryngol Otol. 2017 Aug;131(8):667-670. doi: 10.1017/S002221511700127X. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
8
Skin Necrosis After Implantation With the BAHA Attract: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.
Otol Neurotol. 2017 Mar;38(3):364-367. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001327.
9
Comparative outcomes of active and passive hearing devices by transcutaneous bone conduction.
Acta Otolaryngol. 2016 Jun;136(6):556-8. doi: 10.3109/00016489.2016.1143119. Epub 2016 Mar 16.
10
Transcutaneous Bone-anchored Hearing Aids Versus Percutaneous Ones: Multicenter Comparative Clinical Study.
Otol Neurotol. 2015 Jun;36(5):849-53. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000733.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验