The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence.
Department of Surgery, Division of Ophthalmology, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022;38(5):503-506. doi: 10.1097/IOP.0000000000002228. Epub 2022 Jun 14.
This perspective explores the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 510(k) program, occasionally referred to as premarket notification, which facilitates faster marketing of Class II medical devices, such as orbital implants by demonstrating "substantial equivalence" to previously approved devices. This allows for FDA clearance, rather than FDA approval of orbital implants via comparison to currently marketed implants rather than clinically proven safety standards.
Utilizing the FDA's publicly available 510(k) Premarket Notification database, we conducted a thorough search of FDA-cleared orbital implants dating back to the inception of the 510(k) process in 1976.
We found that 29 orbital implants received 510(k) FDA clearance between 1987 and 2022. Four of the 29 implants were recalled. Only 9 of 29 implants had available data on their predicate or comparison devices; of these 9, 3 implants received clearance based on devices that were subsequently recalled.
This investigation into premarket approval of orbital implants identifies a shortcoming in the FDA 510(k) approval process. Long-term implant-associated morbidity is difficult to predict during premarket analysis but is further complicated for 510(k) cleared implants since devices approved based on substantial equivalence to recalled devices may not be automatically recalled. Clinicians should be aware of the approval process for the devices they select, and review of the 510(k) process, especially as it applies to substantial equivalence to devices subsequently recalled is warranted.
本观点探讨了食品和药物管理局(FDA)的 510(k) 计划,该计划有时也称为上市前通知,通过证明与先前批准的设备具有“实质性等同”,促进了 II 类医疗器械(例如眼眶植入物)更快地推向市场。这允许 FDA 放行,而不是通过与目前市场上的植入物而不是经过临床验证的安全标准进行比较来批准眼眶植入物。
我们利用 FDA 公开的 510(k) 上市前通知数据库,对 1976 年 510(k) 程序启动以来获得 FDA 批准的眼眶植入物进行了全面搜索。
我们发现,1987 年至 2022 年期间,有 29 种眼眶植入物获得了 510(k) FDA 批准。其中 4 种被召回。在这 29 种植入物中,只有 9 种有关于其前身或比较设备的数据;在这 9 种中,有 3 种植入物是基于随后被召回的设备获得批准的。
本研究对眼眶植入物的上市前批准进行了调查,发现 FDA 510(k) 批准程序存在缺陷。在上市前分析中,很难预测长期植入物相关的发病率,但对于获得 510(k) 批准的植入物来说,情况更加复杂,因为基于与被召回设备具有实质性等同的设备获得批准的设备可能不会自动召回。临床医生应该了解他们选择的设备的批准程序,并对 510(k) 程序进行审查,特别是对于适用于与随后被召回的设备具有实质性等同的设备的程序。