Department of Periodontology, Nihon University School of Dentistry, Tokyo, Japan.
Private Practice, Yokohama, Japan.
Clin Adv Periodontics. 2023 Dec;13(4):209-216. doi: 10.1002/cap.10213. Epub 2022 Aug 26.
Despite tissue augmentation and management prior implantation, long-term observation can reveal a change in peri-implant phenotype with some lack of keratinized mucosa (KM). The treatment approach of peri-implant dehiscence in multiple implants is not clearly defined. This report describes the different periodontal surgical approaches undertaken to promote the gingival margin stability and to prevent the peri-implant mucosal inflammation over time.
A 64-year-old woman with peri-implant tissue dehiscence regarding implants placed 20 years ago in a calvarial bone grafted maxilla and mandible was treated. Right maxillary and mandible peri-implants soft tissue were treated with a large apically positioned partial-thickness flap (APPTF) combined to a free gingival graft (FGG) simultaneously. For the left maxillary, where a frenum was in tension associated with infection and pockets, a large APPTF followed by a FGG 4 months later were performed. The KM width (KMW) increased in three operated sites with a gain average of 2.2 mm. The plaque control record decreased from 68% to 21%. All the probing depths were lower than 3 mm. Bleeding on probing was significantly reduced. The gingival index (GI) went from 1.5 to 0.25.
In a multiple implants soft tissue dehiscence case, an APPTF associate to a FGG, delayed or not, seems to be a safety primary approach to improve the KMW and to stabilize the peri-implants soft tissue. Further, a connective tissue graft in a bilaminar approach could be an option to enhance soft tissue thickness and esthetic outcomes.
Why is this case new information? To the best of the authors' knowledge, there are very limited studies regarding multi-implant soft tissue dehiscence treatment. Relevant guidelines are not clearly defined. Despite peri-implant hard and soft tissue augmentation, after a long-term observation (20 years of function), we can observe a change in peri-implant soft tissue phenotype (PISTP) with periodontal complication. What are the keys to successful management of this case? Removal of peri-implant infection and tissue tension (frenum) by a large apically positioned partial-thickness flap (APPTF) before soft tissue augmentation procedure. In case of very thin peri-implant soft tissue, caution is needed to preserve the blood supply from the supra-periosteal plexus. Large APPTF and sufficient amount of keratinized mucosa (KM) should be grafted to compensate for the tissue shrinkage. What are the primary limitations to success in this case? High esthetic demand. A secondary bilaminar approach with a connective tissue graft (CTG) should be necessary to improve the esthetic outcomes. Patient compliance.
尽管在植入前进行了组织增强和管理,但长期观察可能会发现一些角化黏膜(KM)缺乏的种植体周围表型发生变化。多个种植体的种植体周围裂开的治疗方法尚不清楚。本报告描述了为促进牙龈边缘稳定性和随时间推移预防种植体周围黏膜炎症而采用的不同牙周手术方法。
一名 64 岁女性,20 年前在颅骨骨移植的上颌骨和下颌骨中植入了种植体,出现了种植体周围软组织裂开。右上颌和下颌的种植体软组织采用大的根尖向部分厚度皮瓣(APPTF)联合游离龈移植(FGG)同时治疗。对于左侧上颌,由于有一个悬雍垂张力大,伴有感染和牙周袋,4 个月后进行了大的 APPTF 联合 FGG。三个手术部位的角化黏膜宽度(KMW)增加,平均增加 2.2 毫米。菌斑控制记录从 68%下降到 21%。所有探诊深度均低于 3 毫米。探诊出血显著减少。牙龈指数(GI)从 1.5 降至 0.25。
在多个种植体软组织裂开的情况下,APPTF 联合 FGG,延迟或不延迟,似乎是改善 KMW 和稳定种植体周围软组织的安全首要方法。此外,双层结缔组织移植物是增加软组织厚度和美观效果的一种选择。
为什么这个病例是新信息?据作者所知,关于多种植体软组织裂开的治疗方法,相关研究非常有限。也没有明确的相关指南。尽管进行了种植体周围软硬组织增强,但在长期观察(20 年功能)后,我们可以观察到种植体周围软组织表型(PISTP)发生变化,出现牙周并发症。成功管理这个病例的关键是什么?在软组织增强程序之前,通过大的根尖向部分厚度皮瓣(APPTF)去除种植体周围的感染和组织张力(悬雍垂)。在种植体周围软组织非常薄的情况下,需要注意保护骨膜上丛的血液供应。应该移植大的 APPTF 和足够量的角化黏膜(KM),以补偿组织收缩。这个病例成功的主要限制是什么?高美观要求。需要采用双层结缔组织移植物(CTG)的二次方法来改善美观效果。患者依从性。