Departments of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology.
German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner-Site Rhine-Main, Mainz, Germany.
J Thorac Imaging. 2022 Sep 1;37(5):315-322. doi: 10.1097/RTI.0000000000000661. Epub 2022 Jun 14.
Photon-counting detector computed tomography (PCD-CT) has the potential to significantly improve CT imaging in many ways including, but not limited to, low-dose high-resolution CT (HRCT) of the lung. The aim of this study was to perform an intrapatient comparison of the radiation dose and image quality of PCD-CT compared with conventional energy-integrating detector CT (EID-CT).
A total of 32 consecutive patients with available PCD-CT and EID-CT HRCT scans were included in the final analysis. The CT dose index (CTDI vol ) was extracted from patient dose reports. Qualitative image analysis comprised the lung parenchyma and mediastinal structures and was assessed by 3 readers using a 5-point Likert scale. Quantitative image analysis included assessment of noise and signal-to-noise ratio in the lung parenchyma, trachea, aorta, muscle, and background.
The mean CTDI vol was 2.0 times higher in the conventional EID-CT scans (1.8±0.5 mGy) compared with PCD-CT (0.9±0.5 mGy, P <0.001). The overall image quality was rated significantly better by all 3 raters ( P <0.001) in the PCD-CT relative to the EID-CT. Quantitative analysis showed no significant differences in noise and signal-to-noise ratio in the lung parenchyma between PCD-CT and EID-CT.
Compared with conventional EID-CT scans, PCD-CT demonstrated similar or better objective and subjective image quality at significantly reduced dose levels in an intrapatient comparison. These results and their effect on clinical decision-making should be further investigated in prospective studies.
光子计数探测器 CT(PCD-CT)有望在许多方面显著改善 CT 成像,包括但不限于肺部低剂量高分辨率 CT(HRCT)。本研究旨在对 PCD-CT 与传统能量积分探测器 CT(EID-CT)的辐射剂量和图像质量进行患者内比较。
最终分析共纳入 32 例具有 PCD-CT 和 EID-CT HRCT 扫描的连续患者。从患者剂量报告中提取 CT 剂量指数(CTDI vol )。定性图像分析包括肺实质和纵隔结构,并由 3 位读者使用 5 分 Likert 量表进行评估。定量图像分析包括评估肺实质、气管、主动脉、肌肉和背景的噪声和信噪比。
与 PCD-CT(0.9±0.5 mGy,P <0.001)相比,常规 EID-CT 扫描的平均 CTDI vol 高 2 倍(1.8±0.5 mGy)。所有 3 位评估者均认为 PCD-CT 的总体图像质量明显更好(P <0.001)。定量分析显示,在肺实质中 PCD-CT 和 EID-CT 之间的噪声和信噪比没有显著差异。
与常规 EID-CT 扫描相比,在患者内比较中,PCD-CT 在显著降低的剂量水平下显示出相似或更好的客观和主观图像质量。这些结果及其对临床决策的影响应在前瞻性研究中进一步探讨。