Suppr超能文献

光生物调节在减轻疼痛和产生牙科镇痛方面的有效性:一项系统综述。

Effectiveness of photobiomodulation in reducing pain and producing dental analgesia: a systematic review.

作者信息

Kulkarni Sachin, George Roy, Love Robert, Ranjitkar Sarbin

机构信息

School of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, Southport, Gold Coast, QLD, 4215, Australia.

Adelaide Dental School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.

出版信息

Lasers Med Sci. 2022 Sep;37(7):3011-3019. doi: 10.1007/s10103-022-03590-4. Epub 2022 Jun 14.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Photobiomodulation (PBM) is reported in many studies to produce dental analgesia without producing thermal damage to tissues. This systematic review aims to assess in vivo studies to support the statement that PBM can produce dental analgesia.

METHOD

A systematic search strategy was constructed, and PubMed, Scopus, and Embase databases were searched. Subsequently, inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied, reference lists were scanned, and hand searched to identify other suitable studies.

RESULTS

Five studies met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis was not undertaken due to the heterogenous nature of the studies and data. Positive analgesia outcome was obtained in four out of five studies, and one study with no significant results was criticized for poor reporting of laser parameters, small sample size (six).

CONCLUSION

In general, all studies were criticized for poor discussion of all covariates that could have modified the results, consequently resulting in poor quality of evidence, moderate risk of bias, and poor internal validity, as well as external validity. The systematic review also discussed the potential implications of all variables to be considered for future trials, including pulsing mode, contact modes, and tooth characteristics.

摘要

目的

许多研究报告称,光生物调节作用(PBM)可产生牙齿镇痛效果,且不会对组织造成热损伤。本系统评价旨在评估支持PBM可产生牙齿镇痛效果这一说法的体内研究。

方法

构建系统检索策略,检索了PubMed、Scopus和Embase数据库。随后,应用纳入和排除标准,浏览参考文献列表,并进行手工检索以识别其他合适的研究。

结果

五项研究符合纳入标准。由于研究和数据的异质性,未进行荟萃分析。五项研究中有四项获得了积极的镇痛结果,一项无显著结果的研究因激光参数报告不佳、样本量小(六例)而受到批评。

结论

总体而言,所有研究都因对所有可能改变结果的协变量讨论不足而受到批评,从而导致证据质量差、偏倚风险中等、内部效度差以及外部效度差。该系统评价还讨论了未来试验中所有需考虑变量的潜在影响,包括脉冲模式、接触模式和牙齿特征。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验