Suppr超能文献

性偏好与行为:区分有性行为和无性行为个体的因素。

Paraphilic Interests Versus Behaviors: Factors that Distinguish Individuals Who Act on Paraphilic Interests From Individuals Who Refrain.

机构信息

University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, NB, Canada.

出版信息

Sex Abuse. 2023 Jun;35(4):403-427. doi: 10.1177/10790632221108949. Epub 2022 Jun 14.

Abstract

Little is known about distinct factors linked with acting on paraphilic interests or refraining from engaging in paraphilic behaviors. Participants from Canada and the United States ( = 744), aged 19-42 years ( = 29.2; = 3.18), were recruited through Amazon's Mechanical Turk. Participants completed questionnaires about their paraphilic interests and behaviors, as well as potential key factors linked to behavioral engagement (i.e., perceptions of consent, sexual excitation/inhibition, impulsivity, moral disengagement, empathy). Results indicated that higher moral disengagement and impulsivity, lower sexual control (i.e., high sexual excitation, low sexual inhibition), and maladaptive understandings of consent were best able to differentiate individuals who reported highly stigmatized (e.g., hebephilia, pedophilia, coprophilia) or Bondage and Dicipline, Dominance and Submission, Sadism and Masochism(BDSM)/Fetish paraphilic interests and engagement in the paraphilic behaviours associated with these interests relative to individuals who did not report such paraphilic interests or behaviors. Moreover, higher moral disengagement, impulsivity, and maladaptive perceptions of consent were best able to differentiate non-consensual paraphilic interests and behaviours (e.g., voyeurism, exhibitionism) compared to individuals who did not report these paraphilic interests or behaviours. These results provide future directions for the exploration of mechanisms that may contribute to engagement in paraphilic behaviors and may be targets for intervention aimed at preventing engagement in potentially harmful paraphilias.

摘要

人们对与实施恋物癖兴趣或避免参与恋物癖行为相关的独特因素知之甚少。来自加拿大和美国的参与者(=744 人),年龄在 19 至 42 岁之间(=29.2;=3.18),通过亚马逊的 Mechanical Turk 招募。参与者完成了关于他们的恋物癖兴趣和行为以及与行为参与相关的潜在关键因素的问卷(即,对同意的看法、性兴奋/抑制、冲动、道德脱离、同理心)。结果表明,更高的道德脱离和冲动、更低的性控制(即高性兴奋、低性抑制)以及对同意的适应不良理解,能够最好地区分报告高度污名化的个体(例如,恋童癖、恋童癖、恋粪癖)或绑缚和纪律、支配和服从、施虐和受虐(BDSM)/恋物癖兴趣,并与这些兴趣相关的参与这些兴趣的性行为相比,没有报告这些恋物癖兴趣或行为的个体。此外,与没有报告这些恋物癖兴趣或行为的个体相比,更高的道德脱离、冲动和适应不良的同意认知,能够更好地区分非自愿的恋物癖兴趣和行为(例如,窥阴癖、露阴癖)。这些结果为探索可能导致参与恋物癖行为的机制提供了未来的方向,并可能成为预防潜在有害恋物癖参与的干预目标。

相似文献

6
Concordance of Paraphilic Interests and Behaviors.性偏好兴趣与行为的一致性
J Sex Res. 2021 May;58(4):424-437. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2020.1830018. Epub 2020 Oct 28.

本文引用的文献

2
Concordance of Paraphilic Interests and Behaviors.性偏好兴趣与行为的一致性
J Sex Res. 2021 May;58(4):424-437. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2020.1830018. Epub 2020 Oct 28.
3
Moral Disengagement Strategies in Sex Offenders.性犯罪者的道德推脱策略
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2016 Dec 1;24(3):470-480. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2016.1252291. eCollection 2017.
5
Assessing Paraphilic Interests Among Women Who Sexually Offend.评估有性犯罪女性的恋物癖倾向。
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2019 Nov 18;21(12):121. doi: 10.1007/s11920-019-1112-2.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验