• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Projected Impact of the Medicare Part D Senior Savings Model on Diabetes-Related Health and Economic Outcomes Among Insulin Users Covered by Medicare.医疗保险处方药老年人储蓄模式对医疗保险覆盖的胰岛素使用者糖尿病相关健康和经济结果的预期影响。
Diabetes Care. 2022 Aug 1;45(8):1814-1821. doi: 10.2337/dc21-2601.
2
Consequences of forgoing prescription drug subsidies among low-income Medicare beneficiaries with diabetes.放弃处方药物补贴对患有糖尿病的低收入医疗保险受益人的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2022 Oct;57(5):1136-1144. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13990. Epub 2022 Apr 27.
3
Sociodemographic and spending characteristics of Medicare beneficiaries taking prescription drugs subject to price negotiations.接受受价格谈判约束的处方药的医疗保险受益人在社会人口统计学和支出特征方面的情况。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2024 Mar 1;30(3):269-278. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2023.23153. Epub 2023 Dec 23.
4
Falling into the doughnut hole: drug spending among beneficiaries with end-stage renal disease under Medicare Part D plans.陷入“甜甜圈洞”:医疗保险D部分计划下终末期肾病受益人的药品支出
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006 Sep;17(9):2546-53. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2005121385. Epub 2006 Jul 19.
5
Analysis of Proposed Medicare Part B to Part D Shift With Associated Changes in Total Spending and Patient Cost-Sharing for Prescription Drugs.分析拟议的医疗保险 B 部分到 D 部分的转变以及处方药总支出和患者自付费用的相关变化。
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Mar 1;179(3):374-380. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.6417.
6
Reducing out-of-pocket cost barriers to specialty drug use under Medicare Part D: addressing the problem of "too much too soon".在 Medicare Part D 下降低特殊药物使用的自付费用障碍:解决“太多太快”的问题。
Am J Manag Care. 2017 Mar;23(3 Suppl):S39-S45.
7
Out-of-Pocket Drug Costs for Medicare Beneficiaries With Cardiovascular Risk Factors Under the Inflation Reduction Act.《平价医疗法案下,心血管疾病风险因素的 Medicare 受益人自付药品费用》。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2023 Apr 18;81(15):1491-1501. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2023.02.002. Epub 2023 Feb 20.
8
Out-of-Pocket Spending and Financial Burden Among Medicare Beneficiaries With Cancer.癌症 Medicare 受益人的自付支出和经济负担。
JAMA Oncol. 2017 Jun 1;3(6):757-765. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.4865.
9
High Out-of-pocket Health Care Cost Burden Among Medicare Beneficiaries With Diabetes, 1999-2017.1999-2017 年,有糖尿病的联邦医疗保险受益人中个人自付医疗费用负担过重。
Diabetes Care. 2021 Aug;44(8):1797-1804. doi: 10.2337/dc20-2708. Epub 2021 Jun 28.
10
Impact of Medicare Part D for Medicare-age adults with arthritis: prescription use, prescription expenditures, and medical spending from 2005 to 2008.医疗保险 D 部分对关节炎 Medicare 年龄段成年人的影响:2005 年至 2008 年的处方使用、处方支出和医疗支出。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2012 Sep;64(9):1423-9. doi: 10.1002/acr.21696.

引用本文的文献

1
Capturing the Additional Cardiovascular Benefits of SGLT2 Inhibitors and GLP-1 Receptor Agonists Beyond the Control of Traditional Risk Factors in People With Diabetes.在糖尿病患者中,捕捉钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2(SGLT2)抑制剂和胰高血糖素样肽-1(GLP-1)受体激动剂在控制传统危险因素之外的额外心血管益处。
Value Health. 2025 May;28(5):762-768. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2025.01.015. Epub 2025 Feb 6.
2
Patient Out-of-Pocket Costs for Type 2 Diabetes Medications When Aging Into Medicare.当步入老年医保时,2 型糖尿病药物的患者自付费用。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jul 1;7(7):e2420724. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.20724.
3
5-Year simulation of diabetes-related complications in people treated with tirzepatide or semaglutide versus insulin glargine.替尔泊肽或司美格鲁肽对比甘精胰岛素治疗人群的糖尿病相关并发症 5 年模拟研究。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2024 Feb;26(2):463-472. doi: 10.1111/dom.15332. Epub 2023 Oct 22.
4
Economic Evaluation of the $35 Insulin Copay Cap Policy in Medicare and Its Implication for Future Interventions.医疗保险中35美元胰岛素自付费用上限政策的经济评估及其对未来干预措施的启示。
Diabetes Care. 2022 Nov 1;45(11):e161-e162. doi: 10.2337/dc22-1230.

本文引用的文献

1
Association of Out-of-Pocket Spending With Insulin Adherence in Medicare Part D.医疗保险处方药中外购支出与胰岛素依从性的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jan 4;4(1):e2033988. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.33988.
2
Impact of Quality Improvement (QI) Program on 5-Year Risk of Diabetes-Related Complications: A Simulation Study.质量改进(QI)计划对糖尿病相关并发症5年风险的影响:一项模拟研究。
Diabetes Care. 2020 Nov;43(11):2847-2852. doi: 10.2337/dc20-0465. Epub 2020 Sep 4.
3
Factors Contributing to the Rising National Cost of Glucose-Lowering Medicines for Diabetes During 2005-2007 and 2015-2017.2005-2007 年和 2015-2017 年期间导致糖尿病降血糖药物国家费用上升的因素。
Diabetes Care. 2020 Oct;43(10):2396-2402. doi: 10.2337/dc19-2273. Epub 2020 Jul 31.
4
Using the BRAVO Risk Engine to Predict Cardiovascular Outcomes in Clinical Trials With Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors.使用 BRAVO 风险引擎预测钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白 2 抑制剂临床试验中的心血管结局。
Diabetes Care. 2020 Jul;43(7):1530-1536. doi: 10.2337/dc20-0227. Epub 2020 Apr 28.
5
Impact of Higher Insulin Prices on Out-of-Pocket Costs in Medicare Part D.胰岛素价格上涨对医疗保险D部分自付费用的影响。
Diabetes Care. 2020 Apr;43(4):e50-e51. doi: 10.2337/dc19-1294. Epub 2020 Feb 10.
6
Addressing Regional Differences in Diabetes Progression: Global Calibration for Diabetes Simulation Model.解决糖尿病进展的区域差异:糖尿病模拟模型的全球校准。
Value Health. 2019 Dec;22(12):1402-1409. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2019.08.007. Epub 2019 Oct 11.
7
Influence of Diabetes Complications on HbA Treatment Goals Among Older U.S. Adults: A Cost-effectiveness Analysis.糖尿病并发症对美国老年成年人 HbA 治疗目标的影响:成本效益分析。
Diabetes Care. 2019 Nov;42(11):2136-2142. doi: 10.2337/dc19-0381. Epub 2019 Sep 17.
8
Estimating Quality of Life Decrements Due to Diabetes Complications in the United States: The Health Utility Index (HUI) Diabetes Complication Equation.估算美国糖尿病并发症导致的生活质量下降:健康效用指数(HUI)糖尿病并发症方程。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2019 Jul;37(7):921-929. doi: 10.1007/s40273-019-00775-8.
9
Cost-Related Insulin Underuse Among Patients With Diabetes.糖尿病患者相关胰岛素使用不足的成本问题。
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Jan 1;179(1):112-114. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.5008.
10
Erratum. Insulin Access and Affordability Working Group: Conclusions and Recommendations. Diabetes Care 2018;41;1299-1311.勘误。胰岛素可及性与可负担性工作组:结论与建议。《糖尿病护理》2018年;41卷;1299 - 1311页。
Diabetes Care. 2018 Aug;41(8):1831. doi: 10.2337/dc18-er08. Epub 2018 Jun 28.

医疗保险处方药老年人储蓄模式对医疗保险覆盖的胰岛素使用者糖尿病相关健康和经济结果的预期影响。

Projected Impact of the Medicare Part D Senior Savings Model on Diabetes-Related Health and Economic Outcomes Among Insulin Users Covered by Medicare.

机构信息

Center for Drug Evaluation and Safety, Department of Pharmaceutical Evaluation and Policy, University of Florida College of Pharmacy, Gainesville, FL.

Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY.

出版信息

Diabetes Care. 2022 Aug 1;45(8):1814-1821. doi: 10.2337/dc21-2601.

DOI:10.2337/dc21-2601
PMID:35700384
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9999033/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The Medicare Part D Senior Savings Model (SSM) took effect on 1 January 2021. In this study we estimated the number of beneficiaries who would benefit from SSM and the long-term health and economic consequences of implementing this new policy.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Data for Medicare beneficiaries with diabetes treated with insulin were extracted from the 2018 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. A validated diabetes microsimulation model estimated health and economic impacts of the new policy for the 5-year initial implementation period and a 20-year extended policy horizon. Costs were estimated from a health system perspective.

RESULTS

Of 4.2 million eligible Medicare beneficiaries, 1.6 million (38.3%) would benefit from the policy, and out-of-pocket (OOP) costs per year per beneficiary would decrease by 61% or $500 on average. Compared with non-White subgroups, the White population subgroups would have a higher proportion of SSM enrollees (29.6% vs. 43.7%) and a higher annual OOP cost reduction (reduction of $424 vs. $531). Among the SSM enrollees, one-third (605,125) were predicted to have improved insulin adherence due to lower cost sharing and improved health outcomes. In 5 years, the SSM would 1) avert 2,014 strokes, 935 heart attacks, 315 heart failure cases, and 344 end-stage renal disease cases; 2) gain 3,220 life-years and 3,381 quality-adjusted life-years (QALY); and 3) increase insulin cost and total medical cost by $3.5 billion and $2.8 billion. In 20 years, the number of avoided clinical outcomes, number of life-years and QALY gained, and the total and insulin cost would be larger.

CONCLUSIONS

The Medicare SSM may reduce the OOP costs for approximately one-third of the Medicare beneficiaries treated with insulin, improving health outcomes via increased insulin adherence. However, the SSM will also increase overall Medicare spending for insulin and overall medical costs, which may impact future premiums and benefits. Our findings can inform policy makers about the potential impact of the new Medicare SSM.

摘要

目的

医疗保险处方药老年人储蓄模式(SSM)于 2021 年 1 月 1 日生效。本研究旨在估算将从 SSM 中受益的受益人数以及实施这一新政策的长期健康和经济后果。

研究设计与方法

从 2018 年医疗支出面板调查中提取了接受胰岛素治疗的糖尿病医疗保险受益人的数据。经过验证的糖尿病微观模拟模型估计了新政策在最初 5 年实施期和 20 年扩展政策期间的健康和经济影响。从卫生系统的角度估算了成本。

结果

在符合条件的 420 万医疗保险受益人中,有 160 万人(38.3%)将从该政策中受益,每位受益人的年自付费用将平均降低 61%或 500 美元。与非白人亚组相比,白人人口亚组的 SSM 参保人数比例更高(29.6%比 43.7%),年自付费用降低幅度更大(减少 424 美元比 531 美元)。在 SSM 参保人中,有三分之一(605,125 人)预计由于分担成本降低和健康状况改善,胰岛素的依从性会提高。在 5 年内,SSM 将避免 2,014 例中风,935 例心脏病发作,315 例心力衰竭和 344 例终末期肾病;增加 3,220 个生命年和 3,381 个质量调整生命年(QALY);并增加胰岛素成本和总医疗费用 35 亿美元和 28 亿美元。在 20 年内,避免临床结果的数量,生命年和 QALY 的增加,以及胰岛素和总医疗费用的增加将更大。

结论

医疗保险 SSM 可能会降低约三分之一接受胰岛素治疗的医疗保险受益人的自付费用,通过提高胰岛素的依从性来改善健康结果。但是,SSM 也会增加胰岛素和总体医疗费用的医疗保险总支出,这可能会影响未来的保费和福利。我们的研究结果可以为决策者提供有关新的医疗保险 SSM 的潜在影响的信息。