Department of Sociology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
J Homosex. 2023 Nov 10;70(13):3024-3050. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2022.2086749. Epub 2022 Jun 14.
While there has been considerable interest in debates about right wing ideas in LGBT movements-military service, marriage, nationalism, white supremacy-there has been comparatively little attention to self-proclaimed right wing LGBT organizations, what I call the "gay right." Social theory to date offers a fragmented set of theoretical tools to explain them, including homonationalism, post-gay identity, additive intersectionality, and systems justification theory. I propose a two axis framework to unify these theories and map wide ranging diversity within the gay right. This framework is based on both a review of existing theories, and also analysis of 38 gay right organizations in 14 countries. I illustrate the framework with an extended analysis of three gay-right organizations which share a context-the contemporary UK-but have very different politics.
虽然人们对 LGBT 运动中的右翼思想辩论(如兵役、婚姻、民族主义、白人至上)非常感兴趣,但对于自称右翼的 LGBT 组织,即我所称的“同性恋权利”,关注相对较少。迄今为止,社会理论提供了一系列零散的理论工具来解释它们,包括同性恋民族主义、后同性恋身份、附加交叉性和系统合理化理论。我提出了一个两轴框架来统一这些理论,并在同性恋权利内部映射广泛的多样性。该框架基于对现有理论的回顾,以及对 14 个国家的 38 个同性恋权利组织的分析。我通过对三个同性恋权利组织的扩展分析来说明该框架,这三个组织具有相同的背景——当代英国,但政治立场却大相径庭。