• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国中西部不同水文气候条件下水力压裂的水资源足迹。

The water footprint of hydraulic fracturing under different hydroclimate conditions in the Central and Western United States.

机构信息

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, United States.

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, United States.

出版信息

Sci Total Environ. 2022 Sep 20;840:156651. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156651. Epub 2022 Jun 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156651
PMID:35700779
Abstract

The oil and gas (O&G) exploitation via hydraulic fracturing (HF) has augmented both energy production and water demand in the United States. Despite the geographical coincidence of U.S. shale plays with water-scarce areas, the water footprint of HF under drought conditions, as well as its impacts on local water allocation, have not been well understood. In this study, we investigated the water consumption by HF activities under different hydroclimate conditions in eleven O&G-producing states in the central and western U.S. from 2011 to 2020. Our results show that the water consumption under abnormally dry or drought climates accounted for 49.7 % (475.3 billion gallons or 1.8 billion m) of total water usage of HF, with 9 % (86.1 billion gallons or 325.9 million m) of water usage occurring under extreme or exceptional drought conditions. The water usage of HF under arid conditions can translate to high densities of water footprint at the local scale, equivalent to >10 % and 50 % of the annual water usage by the irrigation and domestic sectors in 6-29 irrigation-active counties and 11-51 counties (depending on the specific year), respectively. Such water stress imposed by O&G production, however, can be effectively mitigated by the reuse of flowback and produced water. Our findings, for the first time, quantify the water footprint of HF as a function of hydroclimate condition, providing evidence that the water consumption by HF intensifies local water competition and alters water supply threatened by climate variability. This renders wastewater reuse necessary to maintain water sustainability of O&G-producing regions in the context of both a rising O&G industry and a changing climate.

摘要

水力压裂(HF)开采石油和天然气(O&G)在美国既增加了能源产量,也增加了用水需求。尽管美国页岩气田与水资源匮乏地区在地理位置上重合,但在干旱条件下 HF 的水足迹以及对当地水资源分配的影响尚未得到充分了解。在这项研究中,我们调查了美国中部和西部地区 11 个 O&G 生产州在不同水文气候条件下 HF 活动的用水量,时间跨度为 2011 年至 2020 年。我们的研究结果表明,在异常干燥或干旱气候条件下,HF 的用水量占 HF 总用水量的 49.7%(4753 亿加仑或 18 亿立方米),其中 9%(861 亿加仑或 3259 万立方米)的用水量发生在极端或特殊干旱条件下。干旱条件下 HF 的用水量会导致当地水足迹密度很高,相当于 6-29 个灌溉活跃县和 11-51 个县(具体取决于特定年份)中灌溉和家庭部门年度用水量的 10%以上和 50%以上。然而,O&G 生产造成的这种用水压力可以通过回注水和产出水的再利用得到有效缓解。我们的研究结果首次量化了 HF 作为水文气候条件的函数的水足迹,为 HF 用水量加剧当地水资源竞争和改变气候变化威胁下的水资源供应提供了证据。这使得废水再利用成为 O&G 生产地区在 O&G 行业不断增长和气候变化的背景下保持水资源可持续性的必要条件。

相似文献

1
The water footprint of hydraulic fracturing under different hydroclimate conditions in the Central and Western United States.美国中西部不同水文气候条件下水力压裂的水资源足迹。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Sep 20;840:156651. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156651. Epub 2022 Jun 11.
2
Fit-for-purpose treatment goals for produced waters in shale oil and gas fields.适用于页岩油和天然气田采出水的专用处理目标。
Water Res. 2020 Apr 15;173:115467. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2020.115467. Epub 2020 Jan 6.
3
The water footprint of hydraulic fracturing for shale gas extraction in China.中国页岩气开采水力压裂的水足迹。
Sci Total Environ. 2024 Jan 10;907:168135. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168135. Epub 2023 Oct 27.
4
Water usage for natural gas production through hydraulic fracturing in the United States from 2008 to 2014.2008年至2014年美国通过水力压裂法进行天然气生产的用水量。
J Environ Manage. 2016 Apr 1;170:152-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.01.023. Epub 2016 Jan 27.
5
Water Use and Management in the Bakken Shale Oil Play in North Dakota.北达科他州巴肯页岩油开采中的用水及管理。
Environ Sci Technol. 2016 Mar 15;50(6):3275-82. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5b04079. Epub 2016 Mar 2.
6
Projecting the Water Footprint Associated with Shale Resource Production: Eagle Ford Shale Case Study.预测与页岩资源生产相关的水资源足迹:以鹰滩页岩为例。
Environ Sci Technol. 2017 Dec 19;51(24):14453-14461. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.7b03150. Epub 2017 Nov 30.
7
Chemical characterization in hydraulic fracturing flowback and produced water (HF-FPW) of shale gas in Sichuan of China.中国四川页岩气水力压裂返排和产出水中的化学特征。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Jul;27(21):26532-26542. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-08670-y. Epub 2020 May 5.
8
Effect of maturity and mineralogy on fluid-rock reactions in the Marcellus Shale.成熟度和矿物学对马塞勒斯页岩中流体-岩石反应的影响。
Environ Sci Process Impacts. 2019 May 22;21(5):845-855. doi: 10.1039/c8em00452h.
9
Water footprint of shale gas development in China in the carbon neutral era.碳中和时代中国页岩气开发的水足迹
J Environ Manage. 2023 Apr 1;331:117238. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117238. Epub 2023 Jan 19.
10
Will Water Issues Constrain Oil and Gas Production in the United States?美国的水资源问题会限制石油和天然气产量吗?
Environ Sci Technol. 2020 Mar 17;54(6):3510-3519. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.9b06390. Epub 2020 Mar 3.