Suppr超能文献

严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)中和性体液IgA反应出现得更早,但程度较轻,且与IgG反应相比消退得更快。

SARS-CoV-2-neutralizing humoral IgA response occurs earlier but modest and diminishes faster compared to IgG response.

作者信息

Takamatsu Yuki, Omata Kazumi, Shimizu Yosuke, Kinoshita-Iwamoto Noriko, Terada Mari, Suzuki Tetsuya, Morioka Shinichiro, Uemura Yukari, Ohmagari Norio, Maeda Kenji, Mitsuya Hiroaki

机构信息

Department of Refractory Viral Infections, National Center for Global Health and Medicine Research Institute.

Center for Clinical Sciences, National Center for Global Health and Medicine.

出版信息

bioRxiv. 2022 Jun 9:2022.06.09.495422. doi: 10.1101/2022.06.09.495422.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

Secretory immunoglobulin A (IgA) plays a crucial role in the mucosal immunity for preventing the invasion of the exogenous antigens, however, little has been understood about the neutralizing activity of serum IgA. Here, to examine the role of IgA antibodies against COVID-19 illnesses, we determined the neutralizing activity of serum/plasma IgG and IgA purified from previously SARS-CoV-2-infected and COVID-19 mRNA-vaccine-receiving individuals. We found that serum/plasma IgA possesses substantial but rather modest neutralizing activity against SARS-CoV-2 compared to IgG with no significant correlation with the disease severity. Neutralizing IgA and IgG antibodies achieved the greatest activity at approximately 25 and 35 days after symptom onset, respectively. However, neutralizing IgA activity quickly diminished and went down below the detection limit approximately 70 days after onset, while substantial IgG activity was observed till 200 days after onset. The total neutralizing activity in sera/plasmas of those with COVID-19 largely correlated with that in purified-IgG and purified-IgA and levels of anti-SARS-CoV-2-S1-binding IgG and anti-SARS-CoV-2-S1-binding IgA. In individuals who were previously infected with SARS-CoV-2 but had no detectable neutralizing IgA activity, a single dose of BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 elicited potent serum/plasma neutralizing IgA activity but the second dose did not further strengthen the neutralization antibody response. The present data show that the systemic immune stimulation with natural infection and COVID-19 mRNA-vaccines elicit both SARS-CoV-2-specific neutralizing IgG and IgA response in serum, but the IgA response is modest and diminishes faster compared to IgG response.

AUTHOR SUMMARY

Immunoglobulin A (IgA) is the most abundant type of antibody in the body mostly located on mucosal surfaces as a dimeric secretory IgA. Such secretory IgA plays an important role in preventing the adherence and invasions of foreign objects by its neutralizing activity, while monomeric serum IgA is thought to relate to the phagocytic immune system activation. Here, we report that individuals with the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) developed both systemic neutralizing IgG and IgA active against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Although the neutralizing IgA response was quick and reached the highest activity 25 days post-symptom-onset, compared to 35 days for IgG response, neutralizing IgA activity was modest and diminished faster than neutralizing IgG response. In individuals, who recovered from COVID-19 but had no detectable neutralizing IgA activity, a single dose of COVID-19 mRNA-vaccine elicited potent neutralizing IgA activity but the second dose did not further strengthen the antibody response. Our study provides novel insights into the role and the kinetics of serum IgA against the viral pathogen both in naturally-infected and COVID-19 mRNA-vaccine-receiving COVID-19-convalescent individuals.

摘要

未标记

分泌型免疫球蛋白A(IgA)在黏膜免疫中发挥关键作用,可防止外源性抗原的侵入,然而,人们对血清IgA的中和活性了解甚少。在此,为了研究IgA抗体在新冠疾病中的作用,我们测定了从先前感染过严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)和接种过新冠mRNA疫苗的个体中纯化的血清/血浆IgG和IgA的中和活性。我们发现,与IgG相比,血清/血浆IgA对SARS-CoV-2具有显著但相对适度的中和活性,且与疾病严重程度无显著相关性。中和性IgA和IgG抗体分别在症状出现后约25天和35天达到最大活性。然而,中和性IgA活性迅速下降,在发病后约70天降至检测限以下,而大量的IgG活性在发病后200天仍可观察到。新冠患者血清/血浆中的总中和活性与纯化IgG和纯化IgA中的中和活性以及抗SARS-CoV-2-S1结合IgG和抗SARS-CoV-2-S1结合IgA的水平密切相关。在先前感染过SARS-CoV-2但未检测到中和性IgA活性的个体中,单剂量的BNT162b2或mRNA-1273可引发有效的血清/血浆中和性IgA活性,但第二剂并未进一步增强中和抗体反应。目前的数据表明,自然感染和新冠mRNA疫苗引起的全身免疫刺激可在血清中引发针对SARS-CoV-2的特异性中和IgG和IgA反应,但IgA反应相对适度,且与IgG反应相比下降更快。

作者总结

免疫球蛋白A(IgA)是体内最丰富的抗体类型,主要以二聚体分泌型IgA的形式存在于黏膜表面。这种分泌型IgA通过其中和活性在防止异物的黏附和侵入方面发挥重要作用,而单体血清IgA被认为与吞噬免疫系统的激活有关。在此,我们报告新冠疾病(COVID-19)患者产生了针对严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)的全身中和性IgG和IgA。尽管中和性IgA反应迅速,在症状出现后25天达到最高活性,而IgG反应为35天,但中和性IgA活性相对适度,且比中和性IgG反应下降得更快。在从新冠中康复但未检测到中和性IgA活性的个体中,单剂量的新冠mRNA疫苗可引发有效的中和性IgA活性,但第二剂并未进一步增强抗体反应。我们的研究为血清IgA在自然感染和接种新冠mRNA疫苗的新冠康复个体中针对病毒病原体的作用和动力学提供了新的见解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/746c/9196114/ab2ac208bb7b/nihpp-2022.06.09.495422v1-f0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验