• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

28、32 和 36-mm 股骨头与不同髋臼杯型号初次全髋关节置换术后翻修率与脱位的比较:188591 例初次全髋关节置换术分析。

A Comparison of Revision Rates and Dislocation After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty with 28, 32, and 36-mm Femoral Heads and Different Cup Sizes: An Analysis of 188,591 Primary Total Hip Arthroplasties.

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, the University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.

Traumaplasty Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2022 Aug 17;104(16):1462-1474. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.21.01101. Epub 2022 Jun 16.

DOI:10.2106/JBJS.21.01101
PMID:35703140
Abstract

This article was updated on August 17, 2022, because of previous errors, which were discovered after the preliminary version of the article was posted online. On page 1462, in the first sentence of the Abstract section entitled "Results," the phrase that had read "and 36-mm heads had fewer dislocations than 28-mm (HR = 0.33 [95% CI, 0.16 to 0.68]; p = 0.003), but more dislocations than 32-mm heads (HR for >2 weeks = 2.25 [95% CI, 1.13 to 4.49]; p = 0.021)" now reads "and 36-mm heads had fewer dislocations than 28-mm (HR = 0.33 [95% CI, 0.16 to 0.68]; p = 0.003) and 32-mm heads (HR for ≥2 weeks = 0.44 [95% CI, 0.22 to 0.88]; p = 0.021)." On page 1468, in the last sentence of the section entitled "Acetabular Components with a Diameter of <51 mm," the phrase that had read "and HR for ≥2 weeks = 2.25 [95% CI, 1.13 to 4.49; p = 0.021]) ( Fig. 3 )" now reads "and HR for ≥2 weeks = 0.44 [95% CI, 0.22 to 0.88; p = 0.021]) ( Fig. 3 )." Finally, on page 1466, in the upper right corner of Figure 3 , under "32mm vs 36mm," the second line that had read "2Wks+: HR=2.25 (1.13, 4.49), p=0.021" now reads "2Wks+: HR=0.44 (0.22, 0.88), p= 0.021."

摘要

本文于 2022 年 8 月 17 日更新,原因是先前的错误在文章初稿发布后被发现。第 1462 页,在题为“结果”的摘要部分的第一句话中,原本是“而 36mm 头的脱位少于 28mm(HR=0.33[95%CI,0.16 至 0.68];p=0.003),但比 32mm 头(>2 周的 HR=2.25[95%CI,1.13 至 4.49];p=0.021)多”,现在改为“而 36mm 头的脱位少于 28mm(HR=0.33[95%CI,0.16 至 0.68];p=0.003)和 32mm 头(≥2 周的 HR=0.44[95%CI,0.22 至 0.88];p=0.021)”。第 1468 页,在题为“直径<51mm 的髋臼组件”的最后一句话中,原本是“≥2 周的 HR=2.25[95%CI,1.13 至 4.49;p=0.021])(图 3)”,现在改为“≥2 周的 HR=0.44[95%CI,0.22 至 0.88;p=0.021])(图 3)”。最后,在第 1466 页,在图 3 的右上角,在“32mm 与 36mm”下,第二行原本是“2Wks+:HR=2.25(1.13,4.49),p=0.021”,现在改为“2Wks+:HR=0.44(0.22,0.88),p=0.021”。

相似文献

1
A Comparison of Revision Rates and Dislocation After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty with 28, 32, and 36-mm Femoral Heads and Different Cup Sizes: An Analysis of 188,591 Primary Total Hip Arthroplasties.28、32 和 36-mm 股骨头与不同髋臼杯型号初次全髋关节置换术后翻修率与脱位的比较:188591 例初次全髋关节置换术分析。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2022 Aug 17;104(16):1462-1474. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.21.01101. Epub 2022 Jun 16.
2
In Revision THA, Is the Re-revision Risk for Dislocation and Aseptic Causes Greater in Dual-mobility Constructs or Large Femoral Head Bearings? A Study from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.在翻修全髋关节置换术中,双动结构或大直径股骨头假体的再次翻修脱位和无菌性松动风险是否更高?来自澳大利亚矫形协会全国关节置换登记处的研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 Jun 1;480(6):1091-1101. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002085. Epub 2022 Jan 3.
3
A Comparison of Revision Rates for Dislocation and Aseptic Causes Between Dual Mobility and Large Femoral Head Bearings in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty With Subanalysis by Acetabular Component Size: An Analysis of 106,163 Primary Total Hip Arthroplasties.双动头与大直径股骨头假体在初次全髋关节置换中因脱位和无菌性原因翻修率的比较:髋臼假体大小亚组分析,106163 例初次全髋关节置换分析。
J Arthroplasty. 2021 Sep;36(9):3233-3240. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.05.008. Epub 2021 May 11.
4
Is the Survivorship of Birmingham Hip Resurfacing Better Than Selected Conventional Hip Arthroplasties in Men Younger Than 65 Years of Age? A Study from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.对于65岁以下男性,伯明翰髋关节表面置换术的生存率是否优于某些传统髋关节置换术?来自澳大利亚骨科协会国家关节置换登记处的一项研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Nov;478(11):2625-2636. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001453.
5
THA for a Fractured Femoral Neck: Comparing the Revision and Dislocation Rates of Standard-head, Large-head, Dual-mobility, and Constrained Liners.全髋关节置换治疗股骨颈骨折:比较标准头型、大头型、双动和限制性衬垫的翻修率和脱位率。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021 Jan 1;479(1):72-81. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001447.
6
Are Hooded, Crosslinked Polyethylene Liners Associated with a Reduced Risk of Revision After THA?带帽交联聚乙烯衬垫是否与 THA 翻修风险降低相关?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 Jun;477(6):1315-1321. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000710.
7
Is There a Difference in Revision Risk Between Metal and Ceramic Heads on Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene Liners?在高度交联聚乙烯衬垫上,金属股骨头和陶瓷股骨头的翻修风险是否存在差异?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 May;475(5):1349-1355. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4966-1.
8
Femoral head size and surgical approach affect dislocation and overall revision rates in total hip arthroplasty: up to 9-year follow-up data of 269,280 procedures in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register (LROI).股骨头大小和手术入路影响全髋关节置换术的脱位率和总体翻修率:荷兰关节置换登记处(LROI)269280例手术长达9年的随访数据。
Hip Int. 2023 Nov;33(6):1056-1062. doi: 10.1177/11207000231160223. Epub 2023 Mar 19.
9
What Is the Risk of THA Revision for ARMD in Patients with Non-metal-on-metal Bearings? A Study from the Australian National Joint Replacement Registry.非金属对金属假体的 ARMD 患者行全髋关节翻修术的风险如何?来自澳大利亚国家关节置换登记处的一项研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Jun;478(6):1244-1253. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001277.
10
No Increase in Survival for 36-mm versus 32-mm Femoral Heads in Metal-on-polyethylene THA: A Registry Study.36 毫米与 32 毫米股骨头在金属对聚乙烯全髋关节置换术中的生存率无差异:一项注册研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Dec;476(12):2367-2378. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000508.

引用本文的文献

1
Callus formation after total hip arthroplasty using a short tapered-wedge stem.使用短锥形楔形柄进行全髋关节置换术后的骨痂形成。
Skeletal Radiol. 2025 Mar;54(3):447-455. doi: 10.1007/s00256-024-04756-7. Epub 2024 Jul 25.
2
The True Dislocation Incidence following Elective Total Hip Replacement in Sweden: How Does It Relate to the Revision Rate?瑞典择期全髋关节置换术后真正的脱位发生率:它与翻修率有何关系?
J Clin Med. 2024 Jan 20;13(2):598. doi: 10.3390/jcm13020598.
3
Surgical Approaches in Total Hip Arthroplasty.全髋关节置换术的手术入路
J Orthop Sports Med. 2023;5(2):232-240. doi: 10.26502/josm.511500106. Epub 2023 May 15.