The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Heersink School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2022 Oct;32(10):1114-1120. doi: 10.1089/lap.2022.0102. Epub 2022 Jun 14.
Many studies focus on comparing outcomes of the open method for inguinal hernia repair (IHR) and the laparoscopic method. However, few studies compare different laparoscopic techniques. With over a dozen different techniques described in the literature for laparoscopic IHR, significant opportunities exist to study the efficacy of each technique. We investigated outcomes of a subcutaneous endoscopically assisted transfixion ligation (SEATL) technique and a percutaneous internal ring suturing (PIRS). After receiving institutional review board approval, we completed a retrospective chart review of IHR performed at our pediatric tertiary care center between September 2015 and May 2020. We included all patients under the age of 18 years. We separated laparoscopic repairs from total repairs. Laparoscopic repairs were further divided into their respective techniques. Factors involving patient demographics, operative details, and postoperative complications were statistically analyzed using SPSS. There was a total of 131 IHRs performed with SEATL and 124 IHRs performed with PIRS. Median operative time (minutes) differed significantly ( = .001) with SEATL at 49 (28-66) and PIRS at 55 (37-76)] minutes. Significantly more incarcerated hernias were repaired with PIRS ( = 13) than with SEATL ( = 3, = .006). SEATL had a higher number of postoperative complications; the most significant were granulomas ( = 3, = .09) and recurrent hernias ( = 12, < .001). SEATL had a significantly higher number of postoperative complications. This may be a result of multiple factors including but not limited to the absence of electrocautery, a shorter median operative time, and utilization of absorbable suture. Modifications have been made to this technique to reduce risk of postoperative complications.
许多研究都集中在比较开放式腹股沟疝修补术(IHR)和腹腔镜方法的结果上。然而,很少有研究比较不同的腹腔镜技术。在文献中已经描述了十几种不同的腹腔镜 IHR 技术,因此有很大的机会研究每种技术的疗效。我们调查了皮下内镜辅助贯穿结扎术(SEATL)和经皮内环缝合术(PIRS)的结果。 在获得机构审查委员会的批准后,我们对 2015 年 9 月至 2020 年 5 月在我们的儿科三级护理中心进行的 IHR 进行了回顾性图表审查。我们纳入了所有年龄在 18 岁以下的患者。我们将腹腔镜修复与全修复分开。腹腔镜修复进一步分为各自的技术。使用 SPSS 对涉及患者人口统计学、手术细节和术后并发症的因素进行了统计学分析。 共有 131 例 SEATL 行腹腔镜疝修补术和 124 例 PIRS 行腹腔镜疝修补术。手术时间(分钟)中位数差异显著(=.001),SEATL 为 49(28-66),PIRS 为 55(37-76)。使用 PIRS 修复的嵌顿疝明显多于 SEATL(= 13)(= 3,=.006)。SEATL 的术后并发症发生率更高;最显著的是肉芽肿(= 3,=.09)和复发性疝(= 12,<.001)。 SEATL 的术后并发症发生率明显更高。这可能是多种因素造成的,包括但不限于缺乏电灼、手术时间中位数较短以及使用可吸收缝线。已经对该技术进行了修改,以降低术后并发症的风险。