Centre for Big Data Research in Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Institute for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Bond University, Gold Coast, Australia.
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 15;17(6):e0269482. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269482. eCollection 2022.
Since COVID-19 was first recognised, there has been ever-changing evidence and misinformation around effective use of medicines. Understanding how pandemics impact on medicine use can help policymakers act quickly to prevent harm. We quantified changes in dispensing of common medicines proposed for "re-purposing" due to their perceived benefits as therapeutic or preventive for COVID-19 in Australia.
We performed an interrupted time series analysis and cross-sectional study using nationwide dispensing claims data (January 2017-November 2020). We focused on six subsidized medicines proposed for re-purposing: hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin, ivermectin, colchicine, corticosteroids, and calcitriol (Vitamin D analog). We quantified changes in monthly dispensing and initiation trends during COVID-19 (March-November 2020) using autoregressive integrated moving average models and compared characteristics of initiators in 2020 and 2019.
In March 2020, we observed a 99% (95%CI: 96%-103%) increase in hydroxychloroquine dispensing (approximately 22% attributable to new users), and a 199% increase (95%CI: 184%-213%) in initiation, with an increase in prescribing by general practitioners (42% in 2020 vs 25% in 2019) rather than specialists. These increases subsided following regulatory restrictions on prescribing. There was a small but sustained increase in ivermectin dispensing over multiple months, with an 80% (95%CI 42%-118%) increase in initiation in May 2020 following its first identification as potentially disease-modifying in April. Other than increases in March related to stockpiling, we observed no change in the initiation of calcitriol or colchicine during COVID-19. Dispensing of corticosteroids and azithromycin was lower than expected from April through November 2020.
While most increases in dispensing observed early on during COVID-19 were temporary and appear to be related to stockpiling among existing users, we observed increases in the initiation of hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin and a shift in prescribing patterns which may be related to the media hype around these medicines. A quick response by regulators can help limit inappropriate repurposing to lessen the impact on medicine supply and patient harm.
自 COVID-19 首次被发现以来,有关有效使用药物的证据和错误信息一直在不断变化。了解大流行如何影响药物使用可以帮助决策者迅速采取行动,防止伤害。我们量化了由于 COVID-19 的治疗或预防作用而被提议重新使用的常见药物在澳大利亚的配药变化。
我们使用全国性的配药索赔数据(2017 年 1 月至 2020 年 11 月)进行了一项中断时间序列分析和横断面研究。我们专注于六种被提议重新使用的补贴药物:羟氯喹、阿奇霉素、伊维菌素、秋水仙碱、皮质类固醇和钙三醇(维生素 D 类似物)。我们使用自回归综合移动平均模型来量化 COVID-19 期间(2020 年 3 月至 11 月)每月配药和起始趋势的变化,并比较了 2020 年和 2019 年起始者的特征。
2020 年 3 月,我们观察到羟氯喹配药增加了 99%(95%CI:96%-103%)(约 22%归因于新用户),起始增加了 199%(95%CI:184%-213%),全科医生(2020 年 42%)的处方增加,而不是专家。在监管部门限制处方后,这些增加逐渐减少。在伊维菌素的配药在多个月内略有持续增加,在 4 月首次被确定为潜在的疾病修饰剂后,5 月的起始增加了 80%(95%CI:42%-118%)。除了 3 月与库存有关的增加外,我们在 COVID-19 期间没有观察到钙三醇或秋水仙碱的起始变化。皮质类固醇和阿奇霉素的配药从 2020 年 4 月到 11 月低于预期。
虽然 COVID-19 早期观察到的大多数配药增加是暂时的,似乎与现有用户的库存有关,但我们观察到羟氯喹和伊维菌素的起始增加以及处方模式的转变,这可能与这些药物的媒体炒作有关。监管机构的快速反应有助于限制不当的重新利用,以减轻对药品供应和患者伤害的影响。