Suppr超能文献

比较 Hydrus 和 iStent 微创青光眼手术植入物联合超声乳化术治疗开角型青光眼:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。

Comparison of Hydrus and iStent microinvasive glaucoma surgery implants in combination with phacoemulsification for treatment of open-angle glaucoma: systematic review and network meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Zhejiang University School of Medicine First Affiliated Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.

Department of Ophthalmology, Zhejiang University School of Medicine First Affiliated Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2022 Jun 15;12(6):e051496. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051496.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy and safety of two Schlemm's canal-based microinvasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) devices, the Hydrus Microstent and the iStent Trabecular Bypass combined with phacoemulsification for treatment of open-angle glaucoma.

DESIGN

Systematic review and network meta-analysis.

METHODS

Literature searches were conducted on PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and ClinicalTrials.gov to identify randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the Hydrus or the iStent implantation combined with phacoemulsification for treatment of open-angle glaucoma until September 2020. Risk of bias was assessed using a six-item modified Jadad scale. Effects were estimated using the intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction (IOPR), the percentage of IOPR and the proportion of medication-free patients at follow-up end. Safety was estimated using the proportions of adverse events. The network meta-analysis was conducted within a Bayesian framework using the Markov Chain Monte Carlo method in ADDIS software.

RESULTS

Six prospective RCTs comprising 1397 patients were identified. Regarding the absolute value and the percentage of IOPR, the Hydrus and 2-iStent implantation combined with phacoemulsification were significantly more effective than phacoemulsification alone. Rank probability analysis revealed the Hydrus might be the best choice to lower IOP. There was no significant difference in the proportion of medication-free patients among groups. The Hydrus and 2-iStent implantation had a higher probability to achieve the medication-free status versus the 1-iStent implantation and phacoemulsification alone. Overall safety profiles were good for each device with the focal peripheral anterior synechiae more frequently reported in Hydrus eyes.

CONCLUSIONS

The Hydrus implantation may have a slight advantage over the 1-iStent or 2-iStent implantation in combination with phacoemulsification to treat open-angle glaucoma. Our findings might be of some uncertainty due to the limited included data. Further studies are needed to investigate whether our findings are robust, including high-quality RCTs to directly compare these MIGS devices.

摘要

目的

比较两种基于施累姆氏管的微创青光眼手术(MIGS)装置——Hydrus 微支架和 iStent 小梁切开旁路联合白内障超声乳化术治疗开角型青光眼的疗效和安全性。

设计

系统评价和网络荟萃分析。

方法

检索 PubMed、Web of Science、Cochrane 图书馆和 ClinicalTrials.gov 中的文献,以确定评估 Hydrus 或 iStent 植入联合白内障超声乳化术治疗开角型青光眼的随机对照试验(RCT),检索时间截至 2020 年 9 月。使用改良 Jadad 量表的 6 项评估偏倚风险。使用眼压(IOP)降低(IOPR)、IOPR 百分比和随访结束时无药物治疗患者比例来估计疗效。使用不良事件比例来估计安全性。在 ADDIS 软件中,使用马尔可夫链蒙特卡罗法在贝叶斯框架内进行网络荟萃分析。

结果

纳入了 6 项包含 1397 例患者的前瞻性 RCT。在绝对眼压降低值和 IOPR 百分比方面,Hydrus 和 2-iStent 植入联合白内障超声乳化术均明显优于单纯白内障超声乳化术。秩概率分析表明,Hydrus 可能是降低眼压的最佳选择。各组间无药物治疗患者比例无显著差异。与 1-iStent 植入和单纯白内障超声乳化术相比,Hydrus 和 2-iStent 植入更有可能实现无药物治疗状态。每个装置的总体安全性良好,Hydrus 眼更常出现局灶性周边前粘连。

结论

与 1-iStent 或 2-iStent 植入联合白内障超声乳化术治疗开角型青光眼相比,Hydrus 植入可能具有轻微优势。由于纳入数据有限,我们的研究结果可能存在一定的不确定性。需要进一步的研究来评估我们的发现是否可靠,包括直接比较这些 MIGS 装置的高质量 RCT。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12ad/9204447/072ef36006e4/bmjopen-2021-051496f01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验