Suppr超能文献

体外持续动静脉血液滤过过程中,滤液管路抽吸操作和预稀释补液所产生的跨膜压力。

Transmembrane pressures generated by filtrate line suction maneuvers and predilution fluid replacement during in vitro continuous arteriovenous hemofiltration.

作者信息

Golper T A, Kaplan A A, Narasimhan N, Leone M

出版信息

Int J Artif Organs. 1987 Jan;10(1):41-6.

PMID:3570541
Abstract

A recirculating in vitro CAVH system was designed which generated pulsatile blood and filtrate flows. Monitors recorded hydrostatic pressures simultaneously in the arterial, venous and filtrate lines during varying plasma or blood flow rates and predilution (vs postdilution) replacement fluid flow rates. Similar hydrostatic pressure monitoring was carried out during multiple maneuvers to generate suction on the filtrate side of the hemofilter (Amicon D-20's and Renaflo's). With a plasma flow (Qp) of 100 cc/min and predilution replacement fluid infusion rate of 500 cc/hr, the arterial pressure was 5% greater than during postdilution (p less than 0.05). With a blood flow (Qb) of 50 cc/min, predilution fluid replacement rates of 500 and 1000 cc/hr, and vacuum suction applied to the filtrate compartment, the arterial pressure was 33% lower than during postdilution fluid replacement (p less than 0.03). Nonetheless, the ultrafiltration rate (UFR) was 10 to 30% higher (p less than 0.03). At many other combinations of Qp, Qb and replacement rates and modes, there were no significant changes in arterial pressure. Despite these arterial pressure changes, greater than 70% of the transmembrane hydrostatic pressure (TMP) was due to the negative pressure induced by filtrate suction (gravity, Gomco, wall suction, IMED). The actual pressure in the filtrate compartment measured during Gomco or wall suction was 3/4 of that stated by their gauges, presumably due to leakage. Maximum wall suction never generated TMP's greater than 150 mmHg.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

设计了一种体外循环CAVH系统,该系统可产生搏动性血液和滤液流。在不同的血浆或血流速率以及预稀释(与后稀释相比)置换液流速期间,监测仪同时记录动脉、静脉和滤液管路中的静水压。在多次操作期间进行了类似的静水压监测,以在血液滤过器(Amicon D - 20和Renaflo)的滤液侧产生抽吸作用。当血浆流速(Qp)为100 cc/分钟且预稀释置换液输注速率为500 cc/小时时,动脉压比后稀释期间高5%(p小于0.05)。当血流(Qb)为50 cc/分钟、预稀释液置换速率为500和1000 cc/小时且对滤液腔施加真空抽吸时,动脉压比后稀释液置换期间低33%(p小于0.03)。尽管如此,超滤率(UFR)高10%至30%(p小于0.03)。在Qp、Qb和置换速率及模式的许多其他组合下,动脉压无显著变化。尽管有这些动脉压变化,但超过70%的跨膜静水压(TMP)是由滤液抽吸(重力、Gomco、壁式抽吸、IMED)引起的负压所致。在Gomco或壁式抽吸期间测得的滤液腔实际压力为其压力表所示压力的3/4,可能是由于泄漏。最大壁式抽吸从未产生大于150 mmHg的TMP。(摘要截短于250字)

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验