Suppr超能文献

使用两种不同旋转系统和手动锉对乳磨牙进行根管治疗时根尖挤出碎屑的比较评估:一项体外研究

Comparative Evaluation of Apically Extruded Debris during Pulpectomy Procedure in Primary Molar Teeth Using Two Different Rotary Systems and Hand Files: An In Vitro Study.

作者信息

Nanavati Komal, Katge Farhin, Poojari Manohar, Shetty Shilpa, Kamble Aishwarya

机构信息

Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, T.P.C.T's Terna Dental College and Hospital, Sector-22, Nerul West, Navi Mumbai 4007062, Maharashtra, India.

出版信息

Int J Dent. 2022 Jun 6;2022:9433225. doi: 10.1155/2022/9433225. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Successful outcome of endodontic treatment depends on chemomechanical preparation of the tooth. However, during canal preparation, debris may extrude through the apical foramen causing postoperative complications. The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the amount of apically extruded debris during the pulpectomy procedure in primary molar teeth using two different rotary files and hand files.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Distal roots of sixty extracted primary molars were divided into three groups: group A: Prime Pedo™ pediatric rotary files, group B: DXL-Pro Pedo™ pediatric rotary files, and group C: hand files. Myers and Montgomery experimental model was used. Preweighed Eppendorf tubes were used to collect apically extruded debris. The tubes were then placed in an incubator at 70°C for 5 days. The weight of the debris attained was determined. The data were analyzed using ANOVA and post hoc Bonferroni test.

RESULTS

Hand files produced more apical debris extrusion ( < 0.05). Prime Pedo™ pediatric rotary files produced the least debris ( < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Prime Pedo™ and DXL-Pro Pedo™ pediatric rotary files extruded significantly lower amount of debris apically during pulpectomy as compared to hand files. Rotary files can be considered an alternative to hand files in pediatric endodontics.

摘要

背景

根管治疗的成功结果取决于牙齿的化学机械预备。然而,在根管预备过程中,碎屑可能会通过根尖孔挤出,导致术后并发症。本研究的目的是评估和比较在乳牙牙髓摘除术中使用两种不同的旋转锉和手动锉时根尖挤出碎屑的量。

材料与方法

将60颗拔除的乳牙远中根分为三组:A组:Prime Pedo™儿童旋转锉;B组:DXL-Pro Pedo™儿童旋转锉;C组:手动锉。采用迈尔斯和蒙哥马利实验模型。使用预先称重的艾本德管收集根尖挤出的碎屑。然后将管子置于70°C的培养箱中5天。测定获得的碎屑重量。使用方差分析和事后邦费罗尼检验分析数据。

结果

手动锉产生的根尖碎屑挤出量更多(<0.05)。Prime Pedo™儿童旋转锉产生的碎屑最少(<0.05)。

结论

与手动锉相比,Prime Pedo™和DXL-Pro Pedo™儿童旋转锉在牙髓摘除术中根尖挤出的碎屑量明显更低。在儿童牙髓病学中,旋转锉可被视为手动锉的替代工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6bb/9192212/72dc1d8eed93/IJD2022-9433225.001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验