Gupta Raghav, Gupta Nishkarsh, Kumar Vinod, Garg Rakesh, Bharati Sachidanand J, Mishra Seema, Bhatnagar Sushma
Department of Oncoanaesthesia and Palliative Medicine, Dr. BRAIRCH, AIIMS, New Delhi, India.
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2022 Jan-Mar;38(1):97-103. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_176_20. Epub 2021 Nov 25.
Intubation in head and neck carcinoma (HNC) is difficult due to many reasons. Various guidelines recommend strategies for airway management in such anticipated difficult airway cases. However, literature is limited on airway management planning as per the level of difficulty based on airway assessment in these patients. EL-Ganzouri risk index (EGRI) has been proposed to aid in making airway management plan in HNC cases by some authors. This retrospective study was conducted to look at the data related to the pre-anesthetic airway assessment and the airway management plan executed by the anesthesiologists in 1000 patients of HNC in the previous nearly four years in order to determine how the choices made conformed to EGRI scores.
Records of all the patients with oral cancer posted for surgery over four years from January 2014 to December 2017 were retrospectively analyzed for preoperative airway assessment using El Ganzouri risk index assessment (EGRI), the intraoperative technique for nasotracheal intubation, airway management plan, and any intraoperative complications.
The risk of predicted airway difficulty was low (EGRI <4) in 38 patients and was high in the rest. The EGRI score was higher in the FOB group [4-9] as compared to DL [2-3] and VL [1-6]. The patients with EGRI >7 were intubated awake and those with EGRI <7 were intubated under general anesthesia (79.8%). Overall, the technique of choice for intubation was fibreoptic bronchoscopy (54%) followed by video laryngoscopy (42.6%).
The airway management plan used in a tertiary care cancer center conformed to the approach suggested by the multivariate El Ganzouri risk index (EGRI). EGRI appears to be a useful means to ascertain the appropriate strategies for intubation in head and neck cancer patients.
由于多种原因,头颈癌(HNC)患者的气管插管操作存在困难。各种指南针对此类预期的困难气道病例推荐了气道管理策略。然而,根据这些患者的气道评估难度级别进行气道管理规划的相关文献有限。一些作者提出了埃尔 - 甘祖里风险指数(EGRI),以协助制定HNC病例的气道管理计划。本回顾性研究旨在查看近四年内1000例HNC患者的麻醉前气道评估数据以及麻醉医生执行的气道管理计划,以确定所做选择与EGRI评分的符合程度。
回顾性分析2014年1月至2017年12月这四年间所有接受口腔癌手术患者的记录,以进行术前气道评估,采用埃尔 - 甘祖里风险指数评估(EGRI)、经鼻气管插管的术中技术、气道管理计划以及任何术中并发症。
预计气道困难风险低(EGRI <4)的患者有38例,其余患者风险高。与直接喉镜检查(DL)[2 - 3]和可视喉镜检查(VL)[1 - 6]相比,纤维支气管镜检查(FOB)组的EGRI评分更高[4 - 9]。EGRI>7的患者在清醒状态下插管,EGRI<7的患者在全身麻醉下插管(79.8%)。总体而言,插管的首选技术是纤维支气管镜检查(54%),其次是可视喉镜检查(42.6%)。
三级护理癌症中心使用的气道管理计划符合多变量埃尔 - 甘祖里风险指数(EGRI)建议的方法。EGRI似乎是确定头颈癌患者合适插管策略的有用手段。