Rzezonka Jonas, Chraibi Mohcine, Seyfried Armin, Hein Ben, Schadschneider Andreas
Institute for Advanced Simulation, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Julich, Germany.
School of Architecture and Civil Engineering, University of Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany.
R Soc Open Sci. 2022 Jun 1;9(6):211822. doi: 10.1098/rsos.211822. eCollection 2022 Jun.
It has been realized that the distinction between social-psychological effects and physical effects in pedestrian crowds is complex, and so the relevance of social psychology for the properties of pedestrian streams is still discussed controversially. Although physics-based models appear to capture many properties rather accurately, it was argued that simple systems of self-driven particles could not explain certain emergent phenomena. In particular, results from a recent empirical study of pedestrian flow at bottlenecks have been interpreted as indicating the relevance of social psychology even in relatively simple scenarios of crowd dynamics. The study showed a surprising dependence of the density near the bottleneck on the width of the corridor leading to it. The density increased with increasing corridor width, although a wider corridor provides more space for pedestrians. It has been argued that this observation is a consequence of social norms, which trigger the effect by a preference for queuing in such situations. However, convincing evidence for this hypothesis is still missing. Here, we reconsider this scenario from a physics perspective using computer simulations of a simple microscopic velocity-based model.
人们已经认识到,行人人群中社会心理效应和物理效应之间的区别很复杂,因此社会心理学与行人流特性的相关性仍存在争议。尽管基于物理的模型似乎能相当准确地捕捉到许多特性,但有人认为,简单的自驱动粒子系统无法解释某些涌现现象。特别是,最近一项关于瓶颈处行人流的实证研究结果被解释为表明,即使在相对简单的人群动态场景中,社会心理学也具有相关性。该研究表明,瓶颈附近的密度令人惊讶地依赖于通向瓶颈的走廊宽度。尽管更宽的走廊为行人提供了更多空间,但密度却随着走廊宽度的增加而增加。有人认为,这一观察结果是社会规范的结果,社会规范在这种情况下通过排队偏好引发了这种效应。然而,这一假设仍缺乏令人信服的证据。在这里,我们从物理学角度重新审视这一情景,使用一个简单的基于速度的微观模型进行计算机模拟。