• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新冠疫情及封锁对印度南部一家围产期中心死产率的影响。

The effect of the Covid pandemic and lockdown on stillbirth rates in a South Indian perinatal centre.

作者信息

Aziz Nuzhat, Chandra Ravula Pallavi, Devi Sailaja, Yerubandi Siri

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics, Fernandez Foundation, Hyderabad, India.

出版信息

J Perinat Med. 2022 Jun 17;50(6):660-667. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2022-0122. Print 2022 Jul 26.

DOI:10.1515/jpm-2022-0122
PMID:35708010
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The Covid-19 pandemic affected antenatal care in many parts of the world. It brought about many changes as part of control and containment measures. We examined the effect of the first and second waves of the pandemic in India on stillbirth rates, as indicators of quality of maternity care.

METHODS

Observational study at a tertiary referral perinatal centre with approximately 10,000 births annually. The Covid-19 first wave period was taken as January to December 2020 with lockdown March to June 2020, which included complete shut down of clinics and ultrasound services. The second wave was from January to September 2021. All women with singleton pregnancy who had hospital based antenatal care were included. We investigated monthly trends in obstetric load (new antenatal registrations, total obstetric clinic numbers and total births) with stillbirth numbers as the pandemic continued (daily Covid case trend). We compared first and second wave stillbirth rates, overall as well as those that were small for gestational age (<10th centile) at delivery.

RESULTS

There were 9,251 births with 32 stillbirths in the first wave (rate 3.46/1,000) and 6,228 births with 14 stillbirths in the second wave (2.25/1,000). This represented a 54% higher rate in the first phase and extended lockdown period (p=0.08). The incidence of stillbirths that were SGA was significantly higher in the first wave: 14 vs. 2, (p=0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Reduced access to planned antenatal care during Covid-19 pandemic lockdown was associated with a significant increase in SGA stillbirths.

摘要

目的

新冠疫情影响了世界许多地区的产前护理。作为防控措施的一部分,它带来了许多变化。我们研究了印度疫情第一波和第二波对死产率的影响,将其作为孕产妇护理质量的指标。

方法

在一家每年约有10000例分娩的三级围产期转诊中心进行观察性研究。新冠疫情第一波期间为2020年1月至12月,2020年3月至6月实施封锁,包括诊所和超声服务完全关闭。第二波为2021年1月至9月。纳入所有在医院接受产前护理的单胎妊娠妇女。随着疫情持续(每日新冠病例趋势),我们调查了产科负荷(新的产前登记、产科诊所总数和总出生数)的月度趋势以及死产数。我们比较了第一波和第二波的死产率,包括总体死产率以及分娩时小于胎龄儿(<第10百分位数)的死产率。

结果

第一波有9251例分娩,32例死产(率为3.46/1000),第二波有6228例分娩,14例死产(2.25/1000)。这表明第一阶段和延长封锁期的死产率高出54%(p=0.08)。第一波中小于胎龄儿的死产发生率显著更高:14例对2例,(p=0.03)。

结论

新冠疫情封锁期间计划内产前护理的可及性降低与小于胎龄儿死产的显著增加有关。

相似文献

1
The effect of the Covid pandemic and lockdown on stillbirth rates in a South Indian perinatal centre.新冠疫情及封锁对印度南部一家围产期中心死产率的影响。
J Perinat Med. 2022 Jun 17;50(6):660-667. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2022-0122. Print 2022 Jul 26.
2
Increase in preterm stillbirths in association with reduction in iatrogenic preterm births during COVID-19 lockdown in Australia: a multicenter cohort study.与 COVID-19 封锁期间澳大利亚人为早产减少相关的早产死产增加:一项多中心队列研究。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Sep;227(3):491.e1-491.e17. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.04.022. Epub 2022 Apr 19.
3
Stillbirths in Germany: On the rise, but no additional increases during the first COVID-19 lockdown.德国的死产率:呈上升趋势,但在首次新冠封锁期间没有进一步增加。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2021 Dec;155(3):483-489. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13832. Epub 2021 Aug 7.
4
Resilience and vulnerability of maternity services in Zimbabwe: a comparative analysis of the effect of Covid-19 and lockdown control measures on maternal and perinatal outcomes, a single-centre cross-sectional study at Mpilo Central Hospital.津巴布韦产科服务的弹性和脆弱性:新冠疫情和封锁控制措施对母婴围产结局影响的比较分析,姆皮洛中央医院的单中心横断面研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Jun 4;21(1):416. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03884-5.
5
Effect of the COVID-19 pandemic response on intrapartum care, stillbirth, and neonatal mortality outcomes in Nepal: a prospective observational study.COVID-19 大流行应对措施对尼泊尔产时护理、死产和新生儿死亡结局的影响:一项前瞻性观察性研究。
Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Oct;8(10):e1273-e1281. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30345-4. Epub 2020 Aug 10.
6
Preterm birth, stillbirth and early neonatal mortality during the Danish COVID-19 lockdown.丹麦 COVID-19 封锁期间的早产、死产和早期新生儿死亡。
Eur J Pediatr. 2022 Mar;181(3):1175-1184. doi: 10.1007/s00431-021-04297-4. Epub 2021 Nov 16.
7
Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Excess Perinatal Mortality and Morbidity in Israel.COVID-19 大流行对以色列围产期死亡和发病过高的影响。
Am J Perinatol. 2021 Mar;38(4):398-403. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1721515. Epub 2020 Dec 10.
8
Collaborative maternity and newborn dashboard (CoMaND) for the COVID-19 pandemic: a protocol for timely, adaptive monitoring of perinatal outcomes in Melbourne, Australia.协作式孕产妇和新生儿监测仪表盘(CoMaND)用于应对 COVID-19 大流行:澳大利亚墨尔本进行围产期结局及时、适应性监测的方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Nov 23;11(11):e055902. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055902.
9
Effect of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Stillbirths in Canada and the United States.新冠疫情对加拿大和美国死产情况的影响。
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2024 Apr;46(4):102338. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2023.102338. Epub 2023 Dec 30.
10
Obstetric interventions and pregnancy outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic in England: A nationwide cohort study.在英格兰,COVID-19 大流行期间的产科干预措施和妊娠结局:一项全国性队列研究。
PLoS Med. 2022 Jan 10;19(1):e1003884. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003884. eCollection 2022 Jan.

引用本文的文献

1
Reduced fetal movements and COVID-19 infection: a retrospective cohort study.胎动减少与新型冠状病毒肺炎感染:一项回顾性队列研究
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Jan 30;25(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07196-w.
2
Four Waves of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Comparison of Clinical and Pregnancy Outcomes.四波 COVID-19 大流行:临床和妊娠结局比较。
Viruses. 2022 Nov 27;14(12):2648. doi: 10.3390/v14122648.