Hypertension. 2022 Aug;79(8):e128-e143. doi: 10.1161/HYP.0000000000000217. Epub 2022 Jun 16.
Renovascular disease is a major causal factor for secondary hypertension and renal ischemic disease. However, several prospective, randomized trials for atherosclerotic disease failed to demonstrate that renal revascularization is more effective than medical therapy for most patients. These results have greatly reduced the generalized diagnostic workup and use of renal revascularization. Most guidelines and review articles emphasize the limited average improvement and fail to identify those clinical populations that do benefit from revascularization. On the basis of the clinical experience of hypertension centers, specialists have continued selective revascularization, albeit without a summary statement by a major, multidisciplinary, national organization that identifies specific populations that may benefit. In this scientific statement for health care professionals and the public-at-large, we review the strengths and weaknesses of randomized trials in revascularization and highlight (1) when referral for consideration of diagnostic workup and therapy may be warranted, (2) the evidence/rationale for these selective scenarios, (3) interventional and surgical techniques for effective revascularization, and (4) areas of research with unmet need.
肾血管疾病是继发性高血压和肾缺血性疾病的主要病因。然而,几项针对动脉粥样硬化疾病的前瞻性、随机试验未能表明,对大多数患者来说,肾血管重建术比药物治疗更有效。这些结果大大减少了广泛的诊断性检查和肾血管重建术的应用。大多数指南和综述文章强调了平均改善程度有限,未能确定哪些临床人群从血管重建中受益。根据高血压中心的临床经验,专家们继续进行选择性血管重建,尽管没有一个主要的多学科国家组织的总结声明来确定可能受益的特定人群。在这份面向医疗保健专业人员和广大公众的科学声明中,我们回顾了血管重建随机试验的优缺点,并强调了(1)何时需要考虑进行诊断性检查和治疗,(2)这些选择性情况的证据/基本原理,(3)有效的血管重建的介入和手术技术,以及(4)存在未满足需求的研究领域。