Department of Socio-Medical Sciences, Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Psychology, Education and Child Studies, Erasmus School of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 16;17(6):e0269778. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269778. eCollection 2022.
Whether behaviour change interventions are effective for the maintenance of older migrants' health and well-being is uncertain. A systematic review was conducted to assess evidence for the capacity of behaviour change techniques (BCTs) to promote the health and well-being of older migrants.
Electronic databases (Cochrane CENTRAL, Embase, Ovid MEDLINE and Web of Science) were searched systematically to identify relevant randomised controlled trials, pre-post studies and quasi-experimental studies published before March 2021. Additional articles were identified through citation tracking. Studies examining BCTs used to promote the health and/or well-being of older migrants were eligible. Two independent reviewers used the Behaviour Change Technique Taxonomy version 1 to extract data on BCTs. Data on intervention functions (IFs) and cultural adaption strategies were also extracted. Intervention contents (BCTs, IFs, culture adaption strategies) were compared across effective and ineffective interventions according to health and well-being outcome clusters (anthropometrics, health behaviour, physical functioning, mental health and cognitive functioning, social functioning and generic health and well-being).
Forty-three studies (23 randomised controlled trials, 13 pre-post studies and 7 quasi-experimental studies) reporting on 39 interventions met the inclusion criteria. Thirteen BCTs were identified as promising for at least one outcome cluster: goal-setting (behaviour), problem-solving, behavioural contract, self-monitoring of behaviour, social support (unspecified), instruction on how to perform the behaviour, information about health consequences, information about social and environmental consequences, demonstration of the behaviour, social comparison, behavioural practice/rehearsal, generalisation of a target behaviour and addition of objects to the environment. Three BCTs (instruction on how to perform the behaviour, demonstration of the behaviour, and social comparison) and two IFs (modelling and training) were identified as promising for all outcome clusters.
Thirteen distinct BCTs are promising for use in future interventions to optimise health and well-being among older migrants. Future research should focus on the effectiveness of these BCTs (combinations) in various contexts and among different subgroups of older migrants, as well as the mechanisms through which they act. Given the scarcity of interventions in which cultural adaption has been taken into account, future behavioural change interventions should consider cultural appropriateness for various older migrant (sub)groups.
PROSPERO CRD42018112859.
目前尚不确定行为改变干预措施是否对维持老年移民的健康和幸福感有效。系统评价旨在评估行为改变技术(BCT)促进老年移民健康和幸福感的能力。
系统检索电子数据库(Cochrane 中心、Embase、Ovid MEDLINE 和 Web of Science),以确定 2021 年 3 月前发表的相关随机对照试验、前后研究和准实验研究。通过引文追踪确定了其他文章。符合条件的研究是指评估用于促进老年移民健康和/或幸福感的 BCT。两位独立评审员使用行为改变技术分类学版本 1 提取 BCT 数据。还提取了干预功能(IF)和文化适应策略的数据。根据健康和幸福感结果群(人体测量、健康行为、身体功能、心理健康和认知功能、社会功能和一般健康和幸福感),比较了有效和无效干预措施中的干预内容(BCT、IF、文化适应策略)。
43 项研究(23 项随机对照试验、13 项前后研究和 7 项准实验研究)报道了 39 项干预措施,符合纳入标准。确定了 13 种 BCT 对至少一个结果群有希望:目标设定(行为)、解决问题、行为契约、行为自我监测、社会支持(不明确)、关于如何执行行为的指导、关于健康后果的信息、关于社会和环境后果的信息、行为示范、社会比较、行为实践/排练、目标行为的泛化和向环境中添加对象。三种 BCT(关于如何执行行为的指导、行为示范和社会比较)和两种 IF(建模和培训)被认为对所有结果群都有希望。
13 种不同的 BCT 有望用于未来的干预措施,以优化老年移民的健康和幸福感。未来的研究应侧重于这些 BCT(组合)在各种情况下以及不同老年移民亚组中的有效性,以及它们发挥作用的机制。鉴于考虑到文化适应的干预措施稀缺,未来的行为改变干预措施应考虑到不同老年移民(亚)群体的文化适宜性。
PROSPERO CRD42018112859。