Suppr超能文献

比较多媒体和面对面的疼痛管理教育对慢性下背痛患者疼痛强度和疼痛灾难化的影响:一项随机临床试验。

Comparing the effects of multimedia and face-to-face pain management education on pain intensity and pain catastrophizing among patients with chronic low back pain: A randomized clinical trial.

机构信息

Community Based Psychiatric Care Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.

Student Research Committee, Shiraz University of medical sciences, Shiraz, Iran.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Jun 16;17(6):e0269785. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269785. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Previous studies into Low Back Pain (LBP) assessed the effects of physical interventions or face-to-face (FTF) education mostly in western cultures. The present study aimed to compare the effects of multimedia and FTF pain management education (PME) on pain intensity and pain catastrophizing among participants with chronic LBP.

METHODS

This double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted on ninety participants with chronic LBP randomly allocated to either multimedia, FTF, or control groups. Participants in the multimedia group received PME through watching seven educational CDs at home and their counterparts in the FTF group received the same educations in seven weekly FTF educational sessions. Pain intensity (using a numerical rating scale) and pain catastrophizing (using the Pain Catastrophizing Scale) were assessed before, immediately after, and one month after the study intervention. The effects of the interventions were assessed using the repeated-measures multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA). Effect size and minimal detectable change (MDC) were reported for both variables. The regression model used in the present study was Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE).

FINDINGS

The findings of MANOVA showed the significant effects of time on pain intensity and pain catastrophizing (P<0.001). The Tukey's test showed that before and immediately after the intervention, the mean scores of pain intensity and pain catastrophizing in the FTF and PME groups were significantly different from the control group (P<0.001 and P = 0.001, respectively). MDC did not show clinically significant changes in the mean score of pain intensity and GEE revealed significant difference among the groups.

CONCLUSION

The findings suggested that multimedia PME is as effective as FTF education in reducing pain intensity and pain catastrophizing among participants with LBP. Future studies into the effects of education on LBP are recommended to consider longitudinal designs, a reliable cutoff score for pain catastrophizing, and participants' physical ability.

IRCT REGISTRATION CODE

IRCT20180313039074N1.

摘要

介绍

先前的腰痛(LBP)研究评估了物理干预或面对面(FTF)教育对西方文化中参与者的影响。本研究旨在比较多媒体和 FTF 疼痛管理教育(PME)对慢性 LBP 参与者疼痛强度和疼痛灾难化的影响。

方法

这是一项双盲随机对照临床试验,共纳入 90 名慢性 LBP 患者,随机分为多媒体组、FTF 组和对照组。多媒体组患者在家观看 7 张教育 CD 接受 PME,FTF 组患者每周接受 7 次 FTF 教育课程。在研究干预之前、之后立即和一个月后评估疼痛强度(使用数字评分量表)和疼痛灾难化(使用疼痛灾难化量表)。使用重复测量多元方差分析(MANOVA)评估干预的效果。报告了两个变量的效应大小和最小可检测变化(MDC)。本研究中使用的回归模型是广义估计方程(GEE)。

结果

MANOVA 的结果表明,时间对疼痛强度和疼痛灾难化有显著影响(P<0.001)。Tukey 检验显示,在干预前和干预后立即,FTF 和 PME 组的疼痛强度和疼痛灾难化的平均得分与对照组有显著差异(P<0.001 和 P = 0.001)。MDC 没有显示疼痛强度平均得分的临床显著变化,GEE 显示组间有显著差异。

结论

研究结果表明,多媒体 PME 与 FTF 教育一样有效,可以减轻 LBP 患者的疼痛强度和疼痛灾难化。建议对教育对 LBP 的影响进行进一步研究,考虑采用纵向设计、疼痛灾难化的可靠截断分数和参与者的身体能力。

IRCT 注册号:IRCT20180313039074N1。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9f90/9202919/6e1cdc31dd05/pone.0269785.g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验