Kvistad Christopher Elnan, Kråkenes Torbjørn, Gjerde Cecilie, Mustafa Kamal, Rekand Tiina, Bø Lars
Department of Neurology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Tissue Engineering Group, Department of Clinical Dentistry, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Front Neurol. 2022 May 30;13:891514. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.891514. eCollection 2022.
Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) is an attractive candidate in regenerative research and clinical trials have assessed their therapeutic potential in different neurological conditions with disparate etiologies. In this systematic review, we aimed to assess safety and clinical effect of MSC treatment in traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI), multiple sclerosis (MS) and ischemic stroke (IS).
A systematic search was performed 2021-12-10 in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane where clinical studies assessing MSC treatment in TSCI, MS or IS were included. Studies without control group were excluded for efficacy analysis, but included in the safety analysis. For efficacy, AIS score, EDSS score and mRS were used as clinical endpoints and assessed in a meta-analysis using the random effects model.
Of 5,548 identified records, 54 studies were included. Twenty-six studies assessed MSC treatment in TSCI, 14 in MS and nine in IS, of which seven, seven and five studies were controlled, respectively. There were seven serious adverse events (SAEs), of which four were related to the surgical procedure and included one death due to complications following the implantation of MSCs. Three SAEs were considered directly related to the MSC treatment and all these had a transient course. In TSCI, a meta-analysis showed no difference in conversion from AIS A to C and a trend toward more patients treated with MSCs improving from AIS A to B as compared to controls ( = 0.05). A subgroup analysis performed per protocol, showed more MSC treated patients improving from AIS A to C in studies including patients within 8 weeks after injury ( = 0.04). In MS and IS, there were no significant differences in clinical outcomes between MSC treated patients and controls as measured by EDSS and mRS, respectively.
MSC-treatment is safe in patients with TSCI, MS and IS, although surgical implantation of MSC led to one fatal outcome in TSCI. There was no clear clinical benefit of MSC treatment, but this is not necessarily a proof of inefficacy due to the low number of controlled studies. Future studies assessing efficacy of MSC treatment should aim to do this in randomized, controlled studies.
间充质干细胞(MSCs)是再生医学研究中颇具吸引力的候选对象,多项临床试验已评估了其在不同病因所致神经系统疾病中的治疗潜力。在本系统评价中,我们旨在评估间充质干细胞治疗创伤性脊髓损伤(TSCI)、多发性硬化症(MS)和缺血性中风(IS)的安全性和临床效果。
于2021年12月10日在MEDLINE、EMBASE、科学引文索引和考克兰图书馆进行系统检索,纳入评估间充质干细胞治疗创伤性脊髓损伤、多发性硬化症或缺血性中风的临床研究。无对照组的研究被排除在疗效分析之外,但纳入安全性分析。对于疗效,美国脊髓损伤协会(AIS)评分、扩展残疾状态量表(EDSS)评分和改良Rankin量表(mRS)用作临床终点,并采用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析。
在检索到的5548条记录中,纳入了54项研究。26项研究评估了间充质干细胞治疗创伤性脊髓损伤,14项评估多发性硬化症,9项评估缺血性中风,其中分别有7项、7项和5项研究设有对照组。共发生7起严重不良事件(SAEs),其中4起与手术操作有关,包括1例因间充质干细胞植入后并发症死亡。3起严重不良事件被认为与间充质干细胞治疗直接相关,且均为一过性病程。在创伤性脊髓损伤中,荟萃分析显示从AIS A级转变为C级无差异,与对照组相比,更多接受间充质干细胞治疗的患者从AIS A级改善至B级有一定趋势(P = 0.05)。按方案进行的亚组分析显示,在纳入伤后8周内患者的研究中,更多接受间充质干细胞治疗的患者从AIS A级改善至C级(P = 0.04)。在多发性硬化症和缺血性中风中,分别以EDSS和mRS衡量,间充质干细胞治疗组患者与对照组的临床结局无显著差异。
间充质干细胞治疗创伤性脊髓损伤、多发性硬化症和缺血性中风患者是安全的,尽管间充质干细胞的手术植入在创伤性脊髓损伤中导致了1例致命结局。间充质干细胞治疗尚无明确的临床益处,但由于对照研究数量较少,这不一定证明其无效。未来评估间充质干细胞治疗疗效的研究应以随机对照研究为目标。