School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
CentroNia, Washington, DC.
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2023 Jan;123(1):41-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2022.06.006. Epub 2022 Jun 15.
Water is recommended as an alternative for sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs). Low-income, minority groups in the United States continue to exhibit high SSB and low water consumption, and are more likely to exceed 100% fruit juice recommendations.
To test the effects of a home-based intervention designed to replace SSBs with tap water and reduce excess juice consumption among parents and their infants/toddlers.
Randomized controlled trial.
Parents (n = 92) of infants/toddlers who participated in three Early Head Start home-visiting programs that serve predominantly Hispanic, low-income communities during 2019-2021.
The 12-week intervention (Water Up!@Home) simultaneously addressed physical barriers to tap water consumption (via a water filter) and sociocultural barriers to replacing SSBs and juice with water (via a curriculum). Comparison group received a water filter only. We hypothesized that the intervention would lead to a reduction of 6 fl oz/d in SSB and juice consumption.
Parent-reported self and infant/toddler SSBs, water (filtered, tap, or bottled), and 100% fruit juice consumption.
Analysis of covariance to compare changes in consumption between experimental groups was performed. We also conducted t tests to assess changes within groups.
Participants in both groups reported significant reductions in SSBs from baseline (parents: intervention [-11.2 fl oz/d; P < 0.01]; comparison [-8.0 fl oz/d; P < 0.01]; children: intervention [-1.50 fl oz/d; P = 0.03]; comparison [-1.56 fl oz/d; P = 0.02]), increased water consumption (parents in both groups [+5.6 fl oz/d]; children: intervention [+3.61 fl oz/d; P = 0.01], comparison [+2.24 fl oz/d; P = 0.05]), mostly from filtered tap water. Differences between groups were not statistically significant. Intervention participants reported significant reductions in 100% fruit juice vs comparison (parents: -3.6 fl oz/d vs -1.0 fl oz/d; P < 0.01; children: -0.73 fl oz/d vs +0.48 fl oz/d; P = .03).
The intervention effectively reduced 100% fruit juice consumption. Water security should be examined as a contributor to SSB consumption in this population.
水被推荐作为含糖饮料(SSB)的替代品。美国的低收入、少数族裔群体继续表现出高 SSB 和低水消费,并且更有可能超过 100%果汁的推荐量。
测试一项家庭干预措施的效果,该措施旨在用自来水替代 SSB,并减少父母及其婴儿/学步儿童的过量果汁消费。
随机对照试验。
2019-2021 年期间参加三个早期开端家庭探访计划的婴儿/学步儿童的父母(n=92),这些计划主要为西班牙裔、低收入社区服务。
为期 12 周的干预(Water Up!@Home)同时解决了饮用自来水的物理障碍(通过一个水过滤器)和用自来水替代 SSB 和果汁的社会文化障碍(通过一个课程)。对照组只收到一个水过滤器。我们假设干预措施将导致 SSB 和果汁的摄入量减少 6 液盎司/天。
父母报告的自己和婴儿/学步儿童的 SSB、水(过滤、自来水或瓶装)和 100%果汁的消费。
采用协方差分析比较实验组之间的消费变化。我们还进行了 t 检验来评估组内的变化。
两组参与者均报告 SSB 摄入量从基线显著减少(父母:干预组[-11.2 液盎司/天;P<0.01];对照组[-8.0 液盎司/天;P<0.01];儿童:干预组[-1.50 液盎司/天;P=0.03];对照组[-1.56 液盎司/天;P=0.02]),水的摄入量增加(两组父母均增加[5.6 液盎司/天];儿童:干预组增加[3.61 液盎司/天;P=0.01],对照组增加[2.24 液盎司/天;P=0.05]),主要来自过滤后的自来水。组间差异无统计学意义。干预组报告 100%果汁摄入量显著低于对照组(父母:-3.6 液盎司/天 vs -1.0 液盎司/天;P<0.01;儿童:-0.73 液盎司/天 vs +0.48 液盎司/天;P=0.03)。
干预措施有效地减少了 100%果汁的消费。在该人群中,应将水安全作为 SSB 消费的一个因素进行研究。