Brown Riley Cc, Coombes Jeff S, Jungbluth Rodriguez Klaus, Hickman Ingrid J, Keating Shelley E
School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia
Centre for Research on Exercise, Physical Activity and Health, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.
Br J Sports Med. 2022 Jun 17. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2021-105118.
To investigate the effectiveness of videoconferencing exercise interventions for people with chronic diseases.
Systematic review incorporating meta-analysis.
PubMed, Cinahl, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Embase and Scopus.
The current literature was searched following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. Trials analysing participants with chronic disease undergoing aerobic and/or resistance exercise training over videoconferencing, with exercise capacity and/or quality of life outcomes were included. Meta-analyses were conducted for between-group comparisons of exercise capacity and quality of life. Risk of bias was analysed using the Downs and Black quality checklist and the certainty of evidence with Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE).
Thirty-two trials were included in this review, of which 12 were comparator trials. Small-moderate between-group (videoconferencing vs comparator) effects favouring videoconferencing were seen for studies using a non-exercising comparator for exercise capacity (standardised mean difference (SMD)=0.616, 95% CI 0.278 to 0.954; p=<0.001) and quality of life (SMD=0.400, 95% CI 0.099 to 0.701; p=0.009). Small effects favouring videoconferencing were observed for studies using an exercising comparator for quality of life (SMD=0.271, 95% CI 0.028 to 0.515; p=0.029) and exercise capacity (SMD=0.242, 95% CI 0.059 to 0.426; p=0.009). Moderate risk of bias was identified for included studies (16.3±3.6/28), with GRADE certainty ratings of 'low' (quality of life) and 'moderate' (exercise capacity). Session attendance was 70% and was reported in 23 trials. No serious adverse events relating to videoconferencing were found. Nine trials documented the total number of technical issues that occurred in 17% of the sessions. Positive satisfaction outcomes were associated with ease of access and usefulness of technology.
In patients with chronic disease, videoconferencing exercise interventions appear to be feasible and effective for improving exercise capacity and quality of life. More robust methodology is needed in future studies to improve the certainty of the evidence.
CRD42020191243.
探讨视频会议锻炼干预对慢性病患者的有效性。
纳入荟萃分析的系统评价。
PubMed、Cinahl、MEDLINE、Web of Science、Embase和Scopus。
按照系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目指南检索当前文献。纳入分析通过视频会议进行有氧和/或抗阻运动训练的慢性病参与者,且有运动能力和/或生活质量结局的试验。对运动能力和生活质量的组间比较进行荟萃分析。使用唐斯和布莱克质量清单分析偏倚风险,并采用推荐分级、评估、制定与评价(GRADE)对证据的确定性进行分级。
本评价纳入32项试验,其中12项为对照试验。对于使用非运动对照的研究,在运动能力(标准化均数差(SMD)=0.616,95%CI 0.278至0.954;p<0.001)和生活质量(SMD=0.400,95%CI 0.099至0.701;p=0.009)方面,组间(视频会议与对照)存在小到中等程度的效应,支持视频会议。对于使用运动对照的研究,在生活质量(SMD=0.271,95%CI 0.028至0.515;p=0.029)和运动能力(SMD=0.242,95%CI 0.059至0.426;p=0.009)方面,观察到支持视频会议的小效应。纳入研究存在中度偏倚风险(16.3±3.6/28),GRADE证据确定性评级为“低”(生活质量)和“中等”(运动能力)。23项试验报告了会议出席率为70%。未发现与视频会议相关的严重不良事件。9项试验记录了17%的会议中出现的技术问题总数。积极的满意度结果与技术的易用性和实用性相关。
对于慢性病患者,视频会议锻炼干预似乎对于改善运动能力和生活质量是可行且有效的。未来研究需要更有力的方法来提高证据的确定性。
PROSPERO注册号:CRD42020191243。