• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Re: Øyvind Ulvik, Mathias Sørstrand Æsøy, Patrick Juliebø-Jones, Peder Gjengstø, Christian Beisland. Thulium Fibre Laser Versus Holmium:YAG for Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy: Outcomes from a Prospective Randomised Clinical Trial. Eur Urol. 2022;82:73-79: The Thulium Fibre Laser in Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy: Prospect and Risk Coexist?

作者信息

Li Jinze, Huang Yin, Cao Dehong, Wei Qiang

机构信息

Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China; West China School of Clinical Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

出版信息

Eur Urol. 2022 Sep;82(3):e71. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.05.017. Epub 2022 Jun 14.

DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2022.05.017
PMID:35715364
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Re: Øyvind Ulvik, Mathias Sørstrand Æsøy, Patrick Juliebø-Jones, Peder Gjengstø, Christian Beisland. Thulium Fibre Laser Versus Holmium:YAG for Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy: Outcomes from a Prospective Randomised Clinical Trial. Eur Urol. 2022;82:73-79: The Thulium Fibre Laser in Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy: Prospect and Risk Coexist?
Eur Urol. 2022 Sep;82(3):e71. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.05.017. Epub 2022 Jun 14.
2
Re: Øyvind Ulvik, Mathias Sørstrand Æsøy, Patrick Juliebø-Jones, Peder Gjengstø, Christian Beisland. Thulium Fibre Laser versus Holmium:YAG for Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy: Outcomes from a Prospective Randomised Clinical Trial. Eur Urol. 2022;82:73-9.
Eur Urol. 2022 Aug;82(2):e43-e44. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.04.025. Epub 2022 Jun 2.
3
Re: Øyvind Ulvik, Mathias Sørstrand Æsøy, Patrick Juliebø-Jones, Peder Gjengstø, Christian Beisland. Thulium Fibre Laser versus Holmium:YAG for Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy: Outcomes from a Prospective Randomised Clinical Trial. Eur Urol. 2022;82:73-9.
Eur Urol. 2022 Aug;82(2):e39-e40. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.04.027. Epub 2022 May 21.
4
Re: Øyvind Ulvik, Mathias Sørstrand Æsøy, Patrick Juliebø-Jones, Peder Gjengstø, Christian Beisland. Thulium Fibre Laser Versus Holmium:YAG for Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy: Outcomes from a Prospective Randomised Clinical Trial. Eur Urol. 2022;82:73-9.
Eur Urol. 2022 Aug;82(2):e35-e36. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.03.036. Epub 2022 May 5.
5
Reply to Frederic Panthier, Alba Sierra, and Olivier Traxer's Letter to the Editor re: Øyvind Ulvik, Mathias Sørstrand Æsøy, Patrick Juliebø-Jones, Peder Gjengstø, Christian Beisland. Thulium Fibre Laser Versus Holmium:YAG for Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy: Outcomes from a Prospective Randomised Clinical Trial. Eur Urol. 2022;82:73-9.回复弗雷德里克·潘蒂尔、阿尔巴· Sierra和奥利维耶·特拉克斯致编辑的信，内容涉及：奥伊温德·乌尔维克、马蒂亚斯·索斯特兰德·埃索伊、帕特里克·朱莉博 - 琼斯、佩德·延格斯托、克里斯蒂安·贝伊斯兰。铥光纤激光与钬激光用于输尿管镜碎石术的比较：一项前瞻性随机临床试验的结果。《欧洲泌尿外科杂志》。2022年；82卷：73 - 9页
Eur Urol. 2022 Aug;82(2):e37-e38. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.04.026. Epub 2022 May 9.
6
Reply to Hyung Joon Kim and Khurshid R. Ghani's Letter to the Editor re: Øyvind Ulvik, Mathias Sørstrand Æsøy, Patrick Juliebø-Jones, Peder Gjengstø, Christian Beisland. Thulium Fibre Laser Versus Holmium:YAG for Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy: Outcomes from a Prospective Randomised Clinical Trial. Eur Urol. 2022;82:73-9.
Eur Urol. 2022 Aug;82(2):e41-e42. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.04.028. Epub 2022 May 12.
7
Reply to Alan J. Yaghoubian, Jonathan A. Khusid, and Mantu Gupta's Letter to the Editor re: Øyvind Ulvik, Mathias Sørstrand Æsøy, Patrick Juliebø-Jones, Peder Gjengstø, Christian Beisland. Thulium Fibre Laser Versus Holmium:YAG for Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy: Outcomes from a Prospective Randomised Clinical Trial. Eur Urol. 2022;82:73-9.
Eur Urol. 2022 Aug;82(2):e45-e46. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.04.024. Epub 2022 May 9.
8
Reply to Jinze Li, Yin Huang, Dehong Cao, and Qiang Wei's Letter to the Editor re: Øyvind Ulvik, Mathias Sørstrand Æsøy, Patrick Juliebø-Jones, Peder Gjengstø, Christian Beisland. Thulium Fibre Laser Versus Holmium:YAG for Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy: Outcomes from a Prospective Randomised Clinical Trial. Eur Urol. 2022;82:73-79.
Eur Urol. 2022 Sep;82(3):e72. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.05.016. Epub 2022 May 28.
9
Re: Thulium Fibre Laser versus Holmium:YAG for Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy: Outcomes from a Prospective Randomised Clinical Trial.
Eur Urol. 2023 Feb;83(2):184-185. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.11.012. Epub 2022 Nov 30.
10
Editorial Comment: Thulium fibre laser versus Holmium:YAG for ureteroscopic lithotripsy: outcomes from a prospective randomised clinical trial.编者按：铥光纤激光与钬激光用于输尿管镜碎石术的前瞻性随机临床试验结果
Int Braz J Urol. 2023 Mar-Apr;49(2):267-268. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2023.02.03.