Faculty of Dentistry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Dental Students Research Center, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2022 Oct;8(5):1149-1157. doi: 10.1002/cre2.605. Epub 2022 Jun 19.
Diagnostic casts are one of the standard components of orthodontic records. But they have several drawbacks such as the need for physical space for storage and the risk of breaking due to their brittle composition. Today, the digitalization of orthodontic models is a progress in orthodontics. The purpose of this study was to compare and evaluate common orthodontic linear measurements on plaster casts and digital 3D models using Maestro 3D ortho studio® scanner and software (AGE Solutions®, Pontedera, Italy).
Study casts of 30 orthodontic patients were selected. Tooth width, space analysis, Bolton analysis, overjet, overbite, and linear measurements of dental arch dimensions were performed by two examiners on plaster casts and digital models.
Intra- and interexaminer agreements were evaluated in both manual and digital methods and paired t test was used for evaluating the agreement between the manual and digital measurement. The significance level was set at 0.05.
The intraexaminer agreement was excellent (ICC > 0.75) for most variables in both manual and digital methods. The correlation between the two examiners was significant (p < .05) for most manual and digital measurements. The differences between the manual and digital measurements, although maybe statistically significant, were not clinically significant for most variables.
The use of "Maestro 3D" (AGE Solutions, Pontedera, Italy) scanner and software was acceptable for orthodontic diagnostic measurements instead of study casts.
诊断模型是正畸记录的标准组成部分之一。但它们有几个缺点,例如需要物理空间存储,并且由于其脆性组成,有破裂的风险。如今,正畸模型的数字化是正畸领域的一项进步。本研究的目的是比较和评估石膏模型和数字 3D 模型上常见的正畸线性测量值,使用 Maestro 3D ortho studio®扫描仪和软件(AGE Solutions®,意大利蓬泰德拉)。
选择 30 名正畸患者的研究模型。两名检查者在石膏模型和数字模型上进行牙宽度、间隙分析、博尔顿分析、覆盖、覆合和牙弓尺寸的线性测量。
在手动和数字方法中评估了内部和外部检验者的一致性,并使用配对 t 检验评估了手动和数字测量之间的一致性。显著性水平设定为 0.05。
在手动和数字方法中,大多数变量的内部检验者一致性均为优秀(ICC>0.75)。两位检查者之间的相关性在大多数手动和数字测量中均具有统计学意义(p<.05)。手动和数字测量之间的差异虽然在统计学上可能有意义,但对于大多数变量来说,在临床上并不重要。
使用“Maestro 3D”(AGE Solutions,意大利蓬泰德拉)扫描仪和软件可替代研究模型进行正畸诊断测量,是可以接受的。