Mazza Manuelita, Piperis Maria, Aasaithambi Sathyaraj, Chauhan Jyoti, Sagkriotis Alexandros, Vieira Claudia
Divison of Medical Senology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
CyberKnife and TomoTherapy Department, Iatropolis Medical Group of Companies, Athens, Greece.
Front Oncol. 2022 May 20;12:863641. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.863641. eCollection 2022.
Despite a wealth of real-world data on metastatic breast cancer (mBC), insights into the lived experience are lacking. This study aimed to explore how the lived experience of mBC is described on social media.
A predefined search string identified posts relevant to the lived experience of mBC from Twitter, patient forums, and blogs across 14 European countries. The final data set was analyzed using content analysis.
A total of 76,456 conversations were identified between November 1, 2018, and November 30, 2020. Twitter was the most commonly used social media platform across all 76,456 conversations from the raw data set ( = 61,165; 80%). Automated and manual relevancy checks followed by a final random sampling filter identified 820 conversations for content analysis. The majority of data from the raw data set was generated from the United Kingdom ( = 31,346; 41%). From this final data set, 61% of posts were authored by patients, 15% by friends and/or family members of patients, and 14% by caregivers. A total of 686 conversations described the patient journey ( = 686/820; 84%); 64% of these ( = 439) concerned breast cancer treatment, with approximately 40% of discussions regarding diagnosis and tests ( = 274/686) and less than 20% of discussions surrounding disease management ( = 123/686; 18%). Key themes relating to a lack of effective treatment, prolonged survival and associated quality of life, debilitating consequences of side effects, and the social impacts of living with mBC were identified.
The findings from this study provided an insight into the lived experience of mBC. While retrospective data collection inherently limits the amount of demographic or clinical information that can be obtained from the population sample, social media listening studies offer training to healthcare professionals in communication, the importance of quality of life, organization of healthcare, and even the design of clinical trials. As new targeted therapies are gradually incorporated into clinical practice, innovative technologies, such as social media listening, have the potential to support regulatory procedures and drug toxicity monitoring, as well as provide the patient voice in the regulation of new and existing medicines.
尽管有大量关于转移性乳腺癌(mBC)的真实世界数据,但对其生活体验的深入了解仍很缺乏。本研究旨在探讨社交媒体上如何描述mBC的生活体验。
使用预定义的搜索字符串,从14个欧洲国家的推特、患者论坛和博客中识别与mBC生活体验相关的帖子。使用内容分析法对最终数据集进行分析。
在2018年11月1日至2020年11月30日期间,共识别出76456条对话。在原始数据集中的所有76456条对话中,推特是最常用的社交媒体平台(n = 61165;80%)。经过自动和手动相关性检查,随后进行最终随机抽样筛选,确定了820条对话进行内容分析。原始数据集中的大部分数据来自英国(n = 31346;41%)。在这个最终数据集中,61%的帖子由患者撰写,15%由患者的朋友和/或家庭成员撰写,14%由护理人员撰写。共有686条对话描述了患者的历程(n = 686/820;84%);其中64%(n = 439)涉及乳腺癌治疗,约40%的讨论涉及诊断和检查(n = 274/686),不到20%的讨论围绕疾病管理(n = 123/686;18%)。确定了与缺乏有效治疗、延长生存期及相关生活质量、副作用的衰弱后果以及mBC患者生活的社会影响相关的关键主题。
本研究的结果提供了对mBC生活体验的洞察。虽然回顾性数据收集本质上限制了可从人群样本中获得的人口统计学或临床信息的数量,但社交媒体倾听研究为医疗保健专业人员提供了沟通、生活质量的重要性、医疗保健组织甚至临床试验设计方面的培训。随着新的靶向治疗逐渐纳入临床实践,社交媒体倾听等创新技术有可能支持监管程序和药物毒性监测,并在新药和现有药物的监管中提供患者的声音。