Cassim Naseem, Buthelezi Ernest Philani, Coetzee Lindi Marie, Glencross Deborah Kim
National Health Laboratory Service (NHLS), Johannesburg.
Department of Molecular Medicine and Haematology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg.
J Public Health Afr. 2022 May 24;13(1):1278. doi: 10.4081/jphia.2022.1278.
The National Health Laboratory Service as the preferred pathology service provider for the public health sector in South Africa, developed a national laboratory handbook to improve the clinic-laboratory-interface. A separate primary health care laboratory handbook was developed as part of the ideal clinic initiative by the National Department of Health. This study aimed to assess adherence to these guidelines using CD4 rejections the indicator. The retrospective crosssectional study design was used to analyse national laboratory data for the period from January to December 2019. Data were analysed using SAS 9.4. Lookup tables assigned the origin (health facility/laboratory), rejection reason, and sub-reason based on the populated rejection description that was captured in the laboratory information system. The rejection rate [RR = (rejections/total volume) ´ 100] was reported at the national, provincial and district levels. There were 85,378 rejections reported for 2,844,242 tests (RR 3.0%). Data was reported for 4136 health facilities across nine provinces. The RR was higher for an origin defined as health facility (2.9%) than laboratories (0.1%). The most common rejection reason was unsuitable specimen received (RR=2.3%), representing 75% of all rejections. This rejection criteria included using the incorrect anticoagulant, clotted sample and haemolysis. The provincial RR ranged from 2.2% to 4.0%. Three districts had an elevated RR ≥6% (organisational cut-off set at RR ≤5%). This study demonstrated the value of laboratory data to assess specimen rejections and identify causes to facilitate targeted training.
作为南非公共卫生部门首选的病理服务提供商,国家卫生实验室服务局编写了一本国家实验室手册,以改善诊所与实验室之间的衔接。作为国家卫生部理想诊所倡议的一部分,还编写了一本单独的初级卫生保健实验室手册。本研究旨在以CD4拒收率为指标评估对这些指南的遵守情况。采用回顾性横断面研究设计,分析了2019年1月至12月期间的国家实验室数据。使用SAS 9.4进行数据分析。查找表根据实验室信息系统中记录的详细拒收描述确定来源(医疗机构/实验室)、拒收原因和子原因。在国家、省和地区层面报告了拒收率[RR =(拒收数/总量)×100]。在2844242次检测中报告了85378次拒收(RR 3.0%)。报告了九个省份4136个医疗机构的数据。来源定义为医疗机构的RR(2.9%)高于实验室(0.1%)。最常见的拒收原因是收到的标本不合适(RR = 2.3%),占所有拒收的75%。该拒收标准包括使用错误的抗凝剂、凝血样本和溶血。省级RR范围为2.2%至4.0%。三个地区的RR升高≥6%(设定的组织临界值为RR≤5%)。本研究证明了实验室数据在评估标本拒收和确定原因以促进针对性培训方面的价值。