Suppr超能文献

化学和血液学样本拒收情况及对开普敦一家三级实验室的临床影响。

Chemistry and haematology sample rejection and clinical impact in a tertiary laboratory in Cape Town.

机构信息

Division of Clinical Pathology , National Health Laboratory Service, Tygerberg Hospital, University of Stellenbosch, Cape Town , South Africa.

出版信息

Clin Chem Lab Med. 2011 Oct 14;49(12):2047-50. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2011.743.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recent publications report that up to 70% of total laboratory errors occur in the pre-analytical phase. Identification of specific problems highlights pre-analytic processes susceptible to errors. The rejection of unsuitable samples can lead to delayed turnaround time and affect patient care.

METHODS

A retrospective audit was conducted investigating the rejection rate of routine blood specimens received at chemistry and haematology laboratories over a 2-week period. The reasons for rejection and potential clinical impact of these rejections were investigated. Thirty patient files were randomly selected and examined to assess the impact of these rejections on clinical care.

RESULTS

A total of 32,910 specimens were received during the study period, of which 481 were rejected, giving a rejection rate of 1.46%. The main reasons for rejection were inappropriate clotting (30%) and inadequate sample volume (22%). Only 51.7% of rejected samples were repeated and the average time for a repeat sample to reach the laboratory was about 5 days (121 h). Of the repeated samples, 5.1% had results within critical values. Examination of patient folders showed that in 40% of cases the rejection of samples had an impact on patient care.

CONCLUSIONS

The evaluation of pre-analytical processes in the laboratory, with regard to sample rejection, allowed one to identify problem areas where improvement is necessary. Rejected samples due to factors out of the laboratory's control had a definite impact on patient care and can thus affect customer satisfaction. Clinicians should be aware of these factors to prevent such rejections.

摘要

背景

最近的出版物报道称,高达 70%的实验室总误差发生在分析前阶段。确定具体问题突出了易发生错误的分析前过程。不合格样本的拒收会导致周转时间延迟,并影响患者护理。

方法

对化学和血液学实验室在两周内收到的常规血液标本的拒收率进行了回顾性审核。调查拒收的原因以及这些拒收对潜在临床的影响。随机选择了 30 份患者病历,以评估这些拒收对临床护理的影响。

结果

在研究期间共收到 32910 份标本,其中 481 份被拒收,拒收率为 1.46%。拒收的主要原因是凝血不当(30%)和样本量不足(22%)。只有 51.7%的拒收样本被重复检测,重复样本到达实验室的平均时间约为 5 天(121 小时)。在重复样本中,有 5.1%的结果处于危急值范围内。对患者病历的检查显示,在 40%的情况下,样本的拒收对患者护理有影响。

结论

对实验室中与样本拒收相关的分析前过程进行评估,确定了需要改进的问题领域。由于实验室控制之外的因素而拒收的样本对患者护理有明确的影响,从而可能影响客户满意度。临床医生应了解这些因素,以防止此类拒收。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验