Tsai Ming-Hsien, Chen Yun-Yi, Jang Tsrang-Neng, Wang Jing-Tong, Fang Yu-Wei
Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Shin-Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Department of Medicine, Fu Jen Catholic University School of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Jun 2;9:876229. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.876229. eCollection 2022.
If a technical failure occurs during peritoneal dialysis (PD), the patients undergoing PD may be transitioned to hemodialysis (HD). However, the clinical outcomes of patients who have undergone such a transition are under studied. This study assessed whether patients undergoing HD who have transitioned from PD have the same clinical outcomes as HD-only patients. This research was a retrospective cohort study by searching a National Health Insurance research database for data on patients in Taiwan who had undergone HD between January 2006 and December 2013. The patients were divided into two groups, namely a case group in which the patients were transitioned from PD to HD and a HD-only control group, through propensity score matching at a ratio of 1:4 ( = 1,100 vs. 4,400, respectively). We used the Cox regression model to estimate the hazard ratios (HRs) for all-cause death, all-cause hospitalization, infection-related admission, and major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Those selected patients will be followed until death or the end of the study period (December, 2017), whichever occurs first. Over a mean follow-up of 3.2 years, 1,695 patients (30.8%) died, 3,825 (69.5%) required hospitalization, and 1,142 (20.8%) experienced MACE. Patients transitioning from PD had a higher risk of all-cause death (HR: 1.36; 95% CI: 1.21-1.53) than HD-only patients. However, no significant difference was noted in terms of MACE (HR: 0.91; 95% CI: 0.73-1.12), all-cause hospitalization (HR: 1.07; 95% CI: 0.96-1.18), or infection-related admission (HR: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.80-1.18) between groups. Because of the violation of the proportional hazard assumption, the piecewise-HRs showed that the risk of mortality in the case group was significant within 5 months of the transition (HR: 2.61; 95% CI: 2.04-3.35) not in other partitions of the time axis. In conclusion, patients undergoing HD who transitioned from PD had a higher risk of death than the HD-only patients, especially in the first 5 months after transition (a 161% higher risk). Therefore, more caution and monitoring may be required for patients undergoing HD who transitioned from PD.
如果腹膜透析(PD)过程中发生技术故障,接受PD治疗的患者可能会转为血液透析(HD)。然而,此类转归患者的临床结局尚缺乏研究。本研究评估了从PD转为HD的HD患者与单纯HD患者的临床结局是否相同。本研究为一项回顾性队列研究,通过检索国民健康保险研究数据库,获取2006年1月至2013年12月期间在台湾接受HD治疗患者的数据。通过倾向得分匹配,将患者分为两组,即从PD转为HD的病例组和单纯HD对照组,比例为1:4(分别为1100例和4400例)。我们使用Cox回归模型估计全因死亡、全因住院、感染相关入院和主要不良心脏事件(MACE)的风险比(HR)。对入选患者进行随访,直至死亡或研究期结束(2017年12月),以先发生者为准。平均随访3.2年,1695例患者(30.8%)死亡,3825例(69.5%)需要住院,1142例(20.8%)发生MACE。从PD转为HD的患者全因死亡风险(HR:1.36;95%CI:1.21 - 1.53)高于单纯HD患者。然而,两组在MACE(HR:0.91;95%CI:0.73 - 1.12)、全因住院(HR:1.07;95%CI:0.96 - 1.18)或感染相关入院(HR:0.97,95%CI:0.80 - 1.18)方面无显著差异。由于违反了比例风险假设,分段HR显示病例组在转归后5个月内死亡风险显著(HR:2.61;95%CI:2.04 - 3.35),在时间轴的其他分段则不然。总之,从PD转为HD的HD患者死亡风险高于单纯HD患者,尤其是在转归后的前5个月(风险高161%)。因此,对于从PD转为HD的患者可能需要更谨慎的观察和监测。