• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[股骨远端骨折]

[Distal femoral fractures].

作者信息

Barzen S, Buschbeck S, Hoffmann R

机构信息

Berufsgenossenschaftliche Unfallklinik Frankfurt am Main, Unfallchirurgie und orthopädische Chirurgie, Friedberger Landstr. 430, 60389, Frankfurt am Main, Deutschland.

出版信息

Unfallchirurgie (Heidelb). 2022 Jul;125(7):507-517. doi: 10.1007/s00113-022-01197-6. Epub 2022 Jun 20.

DOI:10.1007/s00113-022-01197-6
PMID:35725933
Abstract

CLINICAL ISSUE

Fractures of the distal femur represent rare but serious injuries with a high 1‑year mortality. An increasingly older patient population requires adapted treatment concepts.

STANDARD TREATMENT PROCEDURE

Surgical treatment using angular stable plating and retrograde nailing is the standard procedure. Conservative treatment is only indicated in cases of low demands and high perioperative risks of the patient.

TREATMENT INNOVATIONS

Primary double plate osteosynthesis and primary implantation of a distal femoral replacement represent new treatment procedures and show promising initial results in the collective of geriatric patients.

DIAGNOSTIC WORK-UP: Conventional radiographs in 2 planes and computed tomography with multiplanar and 3D reconstructions should be performed to enable an adequate assessment of the indications and treatment planning.

PERFORMANCE

Nonunion rates of plate and nail osteosyntheses range from 4% to 10%. No significant differences in long-term results can be observed. The results regarding double plate osteosynthesis and distal femoral replacement so far do not show any disadvantages compared to the existing procedures but there is still insufficient data for general recommendations.

ASSESSMENT

Complex fractures with extensive reconstructive procedures and treatment by distal femoral replacement should be performed in specialized centers.

PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS

The gold standard is still surgical treatment by means of minimally invasive angular stable plate or retrograde nail osteosynthesis. Complex fracture forms require individual treatment planning considering all currently available treatment options.

摘要

临床问题

股骨远端骨折虽罕见但伤势严重,1 年死亡率较高。患者年龄日益增大,需要适配的治疗理念。

标准治疗程序

采用角稳定钢板和逆行髓内钉进行手术治疗是标准程序。保守治疗仅适用于对治疗要求低且患者围手术期风险高的情况。

治疗创新

初次双钢板接骨术和初次植入股骨远端假体是新的治疗方法,在老年患者群体中初步结果良好。

诊断检查

应进行双平面常规 X 线片以及具有多平面和三维重建的计算机断层扫描,以便充分评估适应证和制定治疗计划。

疗效

钢板和髓内钉接骨术的骨不连发生率为 4%至 10%。长期结果未见显著差异。目前,双钢板接骨术和股骨远端假体置换术的结果与现有手术方法相比未显示出任何劣势,但仍缺乏足够数据给出一般性建议。

评估

复杂骨折以及需要广泛重建手术和股骨远端假体置换治疗的情况应在专业中心进行。

实用建议

金标准仍然是通过微创角稳定钢板或逆行髓内钉接骨术进行手术治疗。复杂骨折类型需要考虑所有现有治疗选择进行个体化治疗规划。

相似文献

1
[Distal femoral fractures].[股骨远端骨折]
Unfallchirurgie (Heidelb). 2022 Jul;125(7):507-517. doi: 10.1007/s00113-022-01197-6. Epub 2022 Jun 20.
2
Distal femoral fractures in the elderly: biomechanical analysis of a polyaxial angle-stable locking plate versus a retrograde intramedullary nail in a human cadaveric bone model.老年股骨远端骨折:在人体尸体骨模型中对多轴角度稳定锁定钢板与逆行髓内钉的生物力学分析
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2015 Jan;135(1):49-58. doi: 10.1007/s00402-014-2111-8. Epub 2014 Nov 12.
3
Comparison of retrograde nailing and minimally invasive plating for treatment of periprosthetic supracondylar femur fractures (OTA 33-A) above total knee arthroplasty.全膝关节置换术后股骨髁上假体周围骨折(OTA 33 - A)的逆行髓内钉与微创钢板治疗比较
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2016 Mar;136(3):331-8. doi: 10.1007/s00402-015-2374-8. Epub 2015 Dec 8.
4
Minimally invasive double-plating osteosynthesis of the distal femur.股骨远端微创双钢板接骨术
Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2020 Dec;32(6):545-558. doi: 10.1007/s00064-020-00664-w. Epub 2020 Jun 16.
5
[Osteosynthesis for periprosthetic supracondylar fracture above a total knee arthroplasty using a locking compression plate].使用锁定加压钢板治疗全膝关节置换术后假体周围髁上骨折的接骨术
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2009 Dec;76(6):473-8.
6
[Treatment of Periprosthetic Distal Femoral Fractures].[人工关节周围股骨远端骨折的治疗]
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2019;86(3):205-211.
7
[New osteosynthesis techniques for the treatment of distal femoral fractures].[治疗股骨远端骨折的新型骨固定技术]
Zentralbl Chir. 2005 Aug;130(4):307-13. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-836791.
8
Retrograde intramedullary nail fixation compared with fixed-angle plate fixation for fracture of the distal femur: the TrAFFix feasibility RCT.逆行髓内钉固定与角度固定钢板治疗股骨远端骨折的比较:TRAFFIX 可行性 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Sep;23(51):1-132. doi: 10.3310/hta23510.
9
[Impaired Healing after Surgery for Femoral Fractures].[股骨骨折手术后愈合受损]
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2015;82(5):358-63.
10
Locked plating of periprosthetic femur fractures above total knee arthroplasty.全膝关节置换术后股骨假体周围骨折的锁定钢板固定。
J Orthop Trauma. 2012 Jul;26(7):427-32. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31822c050b.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of fracture morphology on the biomechanical stability of osteosynthetic fixation.骨折形态对骨内固定生物力学稳定性的影响。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2025 Mar 20;51(1):144. doi: 10.1007/s00068-025-02802-0.
2
Determination of the ideal plate for medial femoral condyle fracture fixation: an anatomical fit and biomechanical study.确定股骨内侧髁骨折固定的理想钢板:解剖贴合和生物力学研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Apr 16;25(1):296. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07374-5.
3
Biomechanical analysis of bridge combined fixation system as a novel treatment for the fixation of type A3 distal femoral fractures.

本文引用的文献

1
Dual Plating of the Distal Femur: Indications and Surgical Techniques.股骨远端双钢板固定:适应证与手术技术
Cureus. 2019 Dec 27;11(12):e6483. doi: 10.7759/cureus.6483.
2
Current concepts in fractures of the distal femur.股骨远端骨折的当前概念
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2012;79(1):11-20.
3
Stabilization of distal femur fractures with intramedullary nails and locking plates: differences in callus formation.使用髓内钉和锁定钢板稳定股骨远端骨折:骨痂形成的差异
桥接组合固定系统作为A型3型股骨远端骨折固定的一种新治疗方法的生物力学分析
Front Surg. 2023 Nov 16;10:1264904. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1264904. eCollection 2023.
Iowa Orthop J. 2010;30:61-8.